Please........Post Picture From 35 F/2 ASPH

Plese, Post your favorites picture which take by 35 F/2 ASPH

 

I want to see the SKILL and the Craftsmanship from this lens

 

I will learn from your experienced............... :)

 

because I am a very new amateur !!!!!

 

Thank You Everybody.........................as usual, Pardon for my English<div></div>

You got it, Kamol. Over 150,000 yen went into creating this.<div></div>

xo<div></div>

Kamol,

 

You will learn very little, or nothing, about this, or any other lenses from posted pictures. What you will learn is about the skill of the photograper that took the picture. I am assuming you already own this lens, so the best way to learn is go use it and post YOUR pics here. You will get plenty of feedback. Remeber the camera and the lens are only tools. YOU are the craftsman the makes the picture.

 

Good luck

Basically I'm with John. But, I must admit, this thread is fun.

 

There are a few things you can learn about this lens from our pictures. One thing is that it is about as optically perfect as you can get. Notice the absense of flares and ghosts from Travis's and my shots.

 

If you look at my photo closely you'll notice where the white of the "Pizza of Death" T-shirt crosses the white of the young lady's blouse. The two whites do not flare into each other. There are tonal gradations of white. This is one moment when you know you are getting your money's worth.

 

Kamol may have started something that could be a lot of fun.

 

And hey, Kamol, you heard what John said. Post a few examples of your work with the 35/2 ASPH. I second the motion!

<center><img src="http://not.contaxg.com/files/0017/07ngae2_.jpg"></center>

sweet pic Christopher.

This lens has absolutely no Leica character. But it's easy to focus, light, and sharp. It's very clinical IMO i.e Nikon-like to some extend.<div></div>

Leipzig 19. of June 2003. M6 + 2/35 asph + Delta 100<div></div>

<a href="http://www.jimarnold.org/misc_images/new_7/">7 recent images with the 35/2 asph</a>. <P>All shot with the "new Tri-X" at either 200 or 400 asa and developed in good old D-76 1:1

M6ttl 35 asph.<div></div>

<center>

<img src="http://www.rbarkerphoto.com/misc/Travel/MonoSunrise-1-600.jpg">

</center>

Hospices de Beaune, France

It's sharper wide open than my old 35 'lux, though of course it doesn't open as far.<div></div>

George, is that up on the Acropolis?

Travis used exactly the right word for the 35/2 ASPH. Clinical. What you see is what you get. No glow. But what a dependable lens. The white on white in my photo is from a straight machine print. And it survived my scanner and cyberspace.

M6 + 35/2 ASPH @ f16<div></div>

Thanks, a. That was actually 1 of my 1st Leica pictures. I've

since sold that lens, however, in favor of the 35/1.4 ASPH.

 

-------

 

"sweet pic Christopher.

-- a kochanowski , August 01, 2003; 10:59 A.M. Eastern "

I sold mine after about six months. I found I much preferred the lens on the Hexar AF, and didn't need another 35mm. This is my favorite of the photos I took with mine.<p>

 

<center>

<img src="http://www.spirer.com/images/smoke.jpg"><br>

<i>Smoke, Copyright 2000 Jeff Spirer</i>

</center>

Thank You very very much :)

Kamol, try my Fen Funeral story, the whole thing (bar 1 or 2) is shot on the 35mm -

http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=242422

Great pice of document that portafolio Ivan, very pleased to see, just wish I could see them in a larger size. So you were using three lenses, why the two 35´s?