dennis_couvillion Posted June 29, 2003 Share Posted June 29, 2003 Thanks. Dennis<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcg Posted June 29, 2003 Share Posted June 29, 2003 Little too gritty, too high contrast for my taste. Looks like you blew out all the shadows. But that's personal taste; many many people like these images... And of course, that's the problem with asking, "What do you think?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cy soto Posted June 29, 2003 Share Posted June 29, 2003 I like the position of the fist in your image; maybe a tighter crop around the fist and the text on the wall will improve the photo. Your scan though... That's another story. <i><b>WAY TOO contrasty!! </b></i> Also the appearance of the grain is too overpowering in the overall composition. A smoother tone (less contrast) would be a great improvement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allen Herbert Posted June 29, 2003 Share Posted June 29, 2003 Well ,i liked it. Bit too much contrast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dennis_couvillion Posted June 29, 2003 Author Share Posted June 29, 2003 I tend to agree about the high contrast (although it was taken at midday). For some reason, my scans look different when I post them here. If you're interested, take a look at the scan of the same photo that I posted in one of my folios: http://www.photo.net/photo/1582197 Dennis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray . Posted June 29, 2003 Share Posted June 29, 2003 Dennis, the scan and contrast are minor issues. Since you asked, as a stand alone photo it just doesn't quite make it, IMO. The coincidence of the hand juxtaposed to the archway isn't enough and doesn't really lead the viewer anywhere. The guy below isn't particularly interesting in form or content. From what I've seen your facing street portraits are much stronger, and seem a special talent of yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dennis_couvillion Posted June 29, 2003 Author Share Posted June 29, 2003 Thanks, Ray. I do appreciate the constructive remarks. What I was going for here, though, was the way the guy seemed to contort his left arm to mimic the archway. Here's a much lighter version of the scan. Dennis<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allen Herbert Posted June 29, 2003 Share Posted June 29, 2003 I see what you mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcg Posted June 29, 2003 Share Posted June 29, 2003 The lighter scan DOES work better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dennis_couvillion Posted June 29, 2003 Author Share Posted June 29, 2003 Thanks, Patrick. BTW, that why I asked what you thought. I'm not fishing for compliments on something that I know has imperfections; I like to hear what you really think makes an image work. Dennis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray . Posted June 29, 2003 Share Posted June 29, 2003 Still doesn't work for me. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noddy_b Posted June 29, 2003 Share Posted June 29, 2003 I think the lighter one looks nicer with the shadow details coming out, but less dramatic than the high contrast one. In the lighter one, the white areas are still burned, though, and the man seems to have lost its value as the focusing point of the photo (as in the high contrast one). In the lighter photo, my eyes are drawn to the gate of the "Presbytere", which is not very exciting. IMO I'd like to keep the man as the main subject, but increase the shadow details and lower the contrast at the same time - if you know what I mean. Overall, I think it's a captivating photo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_Es Posted June 29, 2003 Share Posted June 29, 2003 Dennis, I like the contrast in the original submission and I think the composition is very good. Aesthically there is absolutely nothing wrong with the photo. I don't see the point, the story you are trying to tell--and pictures all tell stories. Is there supposed to be some kind of humorous irony in this shot--the staid and solumnn background and the casual arm going in the air? You've got something going here. I see this photo as kind of visual mental note to yourself. Scenes like this will repeat themselves. File this shot under "Similar Possibilities." --Alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now