Jump to content

John Seaman

PhotoNet Pro
  • Posts

    5,711
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

John Seaman last won the day on November 21 2016

John Seaman had the most liked content!

Reputation

10,656 Excellent

About John Seaman

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Thanks for this Marc. Actually I did crop out the bud near the edge, also cropped out some of the vignette, if you look at the first picture in the thread. The second picture was the original uncropped version. I like to include buds in flower shots, even dead heads, as they help to tell a story. The lens is a Rokkor-TC 135mm F/4, which has a multi blade near circular aperture. Here's a picture, showing it with the Minolta MD to Minolta AF adaptor. You may recall that when Minolta introduced their AF system, they used a completely different lens mount - much to the disgust of owners of MD mount lenses. An adaptor was available but it had to include a glass element to maintain infinity focus, to the detriment of image quality. My adaptor is third party rather than Minolta's own. Thanks again ... the lens:
  2. Can you explain in what circumstances the error appears? In what mode, with or without a lens, when putting film in etc?
  3. John Seaman

    John Seaman

    Interesting set Mike. You achieve an intimacy with your subjects without any suggestion of being intrusive. I don't mind the slightly erratic framing etc, it even reinforces the immediacy of the occasions. PS this is the third time I've tried to add this review. It wasn't saved before because I didn't realise that I have to give a star rating.
  4. Great write up on an interesting camera, I see the EL series as something of a transitional type between the mechanical Nikkormats and the FE. Wasn't the last EL version badged as Nikon rather than Nikkormat / Nikomat? And it seems to have been an early example of the trend towards all-black bodies as standard.
  5. Princess Charlotte's left arm - the sleeve of her cardigan does not quite line up with her hand. It's a massive storm in a teacup.
  6. Well, it might not be acceptable to go back to old forum posts and edit them. But I don't see any reason why captions and tags can't be added to one's own gallery pictures at any time. I don't think photo.net will ever be perfect, but it does seem that many users have moved on from fretting about the site, and are making the best use of things - and of course new members will tend to accept the site "as is" and get on with it.
  7. Mike, wow! Thanks. I include the exif data for the simple reason that I don't know how to remove it. I've hardly looked at my portfolio since the PN "upgrade", to be honest I found it rather hard to actually find. Hopefully the thing has settled down now and people seem to be quite active in the Gallery area. Anyway I was prompted by your post to revisit it and eventually worked out how to set up a new album with my name, and add some newer pictures to it. I'm confused though by the process of adding captions, tags and notes whereby it does not seem to be possible to add these to older images. Or indeed, to new ones - unless within the 15 minute editing limit?
  8. Joe, out of curiosity I googled these and found two reviews which may help: https://www.talkphotography.co.uk/threads/review-lencarta-safari-heads-and-ring-light.266649/ https://www.talkphotography.co.uk/threads/initial-review-of-the-lencarta-safari-600-ringflash-and-head.114813/
  9. Thanks for the comment. The vignette was in the original image due to the equipment used. I find it an attractive feature, when not over-used. Thanks again
  10. Thanks for your kind words Mike. I guess I'm a bit of a gear head and sometimes let the nuts and bolts of making the image override the actual content.
×
×
  • Create New...