Landscape
510 topics in this forum
-
- 6 replies
- 177 views
-
- 6 replies
- 259 views
-
- 5 replies
- 113 views
-
- 4 replies
- 451 views
-
- 3 replies
- 86 views
-
- 8 replies
- 244 views
-
- 0 replies
- 63 views
-
- 5 replies
- 334 views
-
- 5 replies
- 203 views
-
- 7 replies
- 298 views
-
- 5 replies
- 357 views
-
- 1 reply
- 131 views
-
- 6 replies
- 287 views
-
- 7 replies
- 414 views
-
- 8 replies
- 318 views
-
- 9 replies
- 389 views
-
- 6 replies
- 332 views
-
- 6 replies
- 367 views
-
- 7 replies
- 356 views
-
- 6 replies
- 343 views
-
- 8 replies
- 439 views
-
- 7 replies
- 433 views
-
- 6 replies
- 488 views
-
- 10 replies
- 516 views
-
- 2 replies
- 556 views
-
Who's Online 11 Members, 0 Anonymous, 445 Guests (See full list)
-
Recent Gallery Images
-
Recent Forum Wide Posts
-
-
By MrAndMrsIzzy · Posted
That's good! Window rather than machine. Better terminology!! Aside from that. Dprev! Used to post there. Thought it was no more! What happened? -
By john_shriver · Posted
There were very high domestic excise taxes on cameras in Japan in that era. So cameras to be sold through the post exchanges to American GI's were specially marked because they would not be taxed. A Japanese citizen with an <EP> or <CPO> marked camera would be presumed to be a tax dodger. For similar reasons, the Nikkormat was known as the Nikomat in Japan -- to make it clear that was the domestic "taxed" model. -
By john_shriver · Posted
Probably without rangefinder coupling, since they describe them as "mirrorless." -
-
