inaki_gorraiz

Well, the overexposure was done in purpose. The JPEG artifacts are messing the image, but I actually metered the light on her while having a strong backlight (the sun was a little bit on top, and behind her). The whole idea was to overexpose the shore.

Please, critique...

A member of the band Kevin Martin and the Hiwatts

Please, critique

Wow, wow, wow!!!

Please, critique!!

Critique, please

Please, critique...

Please, critique.

I had a fraction of a second to take this picture... then, the

seagull took off.

Zoom effect added with PS 6.0

You are right with the definition issue... I had to crop the picture in order to get what really was intended. I discarded abut 40% of the original, because the zoom of the camera wasn't powerful enough and the result was a completely uninteresting image.

 

Also, the low light made me shoot at a low speed, and the ASA was set automatically (probably at 200 or so).

 

Thanks for the comments!.

I took this picture using my digital camera DSC-P1. The lens wasn't

long enough for what I wanted to show, so I had to shoot and then

crop the resulting image. I think I regret more than ever to no have

used my Minolta with a Velvia or Kodakchrome...

 

Anyway, what do you think?

Sorry, I cannot upload a larger version since I don't have access to the original copy: I left it at home, 8000 miles away from here. This picture is from my website, very low res.

What do you think of this. It was taken hanheld, with a 200mm lens at

1/8 of a second...