-
Posts
2,036 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by Tony Rowlett
-
-
I've had some pretty good success with the Fuji Sensia films. They
seem to reproduce skin tones well, and they're pretty good for
landscapes, too.
-
Erik, thanks for posting that. Interesting story. I'm one of those
"full frame, black line" people too.
-
I like this photograph, too. It makes me want to more thoroughly
study my own pictures that first appear unprintable and maybe are too
soon dismissed. Maybe if they are "worked" a bit more. Cool one,
Mike!
-
I really like this photograph but I wasn't sure how to write it. I
follow and connect perfectly with everything Tom said about it. I'm
glad he spoke up. Very nice.
-
-
Is that bizzare or what? For me also it has a slight resemblance to
"Napalm Girl." Interestingly, the Digital Journalist site has a story
about it put up just today:
-
Truly weird. Spooky and mysterious. Head shop symbol. Incense and
candle stick sales. A still from the Blair Witch Project.
Simplification of details into line and form produces a lunar --
moon/star- image. The logo of a Tarot card reader. A good pinhole
photography sign. A business card made of hemp. Remember patchouli?
-
Depending on the extent of the blur and the image itself, I have been
mostly enthused with the selective focus photographs. Particularly
with people. I'd much rather have most of the photograph blurry with
the focus of attention sharp, than have all the photograph sharp as a
tack. The exception to this is with wide angle, 20mm and below in the
35mm format where the effect of the wide angle is more important than
selective focus. In my view, though, you just can't beat the pleasant
angle of view with the good 'ol 50mm lens. My shot here would have
looked better at f/4 maybe.
-
You're close, it was a Leica 50mm f/2 Summicron. In the dapple
lighting I remember being only a few stops down from wide open,
probably f/5.6. Film was Tmax 400. I really like the background in
this shot.
-
<center>
<img src="http://www.alaska.net/~rowlett/images/330-27-dad.jpg" width=709 height=480>
<p>
<b>"My Dad the Hoodlum"</b><br>
Fairbanks, Alaska
</center>
-
How about an image of Earth?
-
the first part of your posts suggests "handing down" but the question
makes me feel like the kid wants something. still thinking.
-
is the small hand giving/offering it to the aged adult, or asking
for/in need of it? good and very interesting challenge and I would
like to work on it. thinking...
-
For Sale/Wanted to Buy posts are encouraged. I have created a category for them. Please have at it, and I may join you!
-
This immediately reminded me of the recent movie, "Elizabeth" which
included several scenes that started from as high a viewpoint as this.
I think it was to emphasize "church" and "state" before
people and the Queen, but I've mostly forgotten what the director said
on this point during the "director's comments track" of the DVD
(which, incidently, is an awesome function of DVDs and this was a
wonderful movie/history lesson to utilize the function). I really
like the details of the archways, particularly the shadows on the
distant one. I don't think you should attempt to straighten anything
out with photoshop or a shift lens, as then it wouldn't look as
natural, and it would at least slightly defeat the purose of having
obtained a highish viewpoint in the first place. Just curious,
though, how are you getting "clockwise" from the nearest archway? I
understand your comment, but don't understand where you're getting the
motion there.
-
I think this is a good photograph. It is interesting that, instead of
the calm and peaceful feeling that this photograph ought to rightly
invoke, I feel a sense of dread, maybe impending doom. The recent
films "Titanic" and "Perfect Storm," and old WWII submarine flicks
probably impact my interpretation. The photograph has an overall dark
tone. One subject appears hasteful and both are headed for the darker
quadrant where the ground has apparantly sunk. Maybe there were other
people there who have since perished. The foreground contains a dark
impression, maybe an object from the wreckage. The aquatic color is
eerie and mysterious. Almost feel like a giant swamp monster will
soon rise to finish its prey. Maybe that's not ground at all but
rather the monster.
-
The vehicle is a VW?
-
Thanks, fw, but my shot is certainly not as accomplished as you
somehow managing to get your July 1 post in between two June 30
posts! I've never seen that happen before in a greenspun forum.
<p>
Interesting though about the retouched image. I took a little off the
top, left, and right, and a little more off the bottom to remove some
of the foreground. It may be the foreground in the original that
added some strength to your perception of the image. After Tom
brought the several bright whispers to my attention, they became
obvious distractions to me, but not before Tom spoke. The biggest
improvement for me was the boy's shoe. I didn't even see it, but it
definitely competed with the much more important element in the image
area -- the boy's face. I've learned from Uncle Ansel about sometimes
darkening the surrounding areas of the print. This I did a little
with the bottom part. As a side note, the original is a straight
print, no dodge or burn!
-
<center>
<img src="http://www.alaska.net/~rowlett/images/330-25-2.jpg"
width=416 height=622>
<p>
"Young Kid and Shovel (revised)"
</center>
<p>
Digitally modified to correct shoe and bright spots per Tom's
response. I agree that it looks much better. Thanks, Tom!
-
Four additional Noctilux shots have been posted to
-
Sometimes I am a slave to the full frame black line, and this may be
one of those times. I did fiddle with cropping just a bit, but I
liked the top, top left, and top right content areas so much that it
would have looked awkward to remove only part of the bottom hence the
'aw heck, full frame it is' attitude. But I do understand your point
and I do forego the original full frame on many of my shots but
usually add a line to the final crop to separate the image both from a
white background and a black one (w/a 1 pixel white border). Per my
'Beautiful Flaws' thread, I really love the uneven, slightly wobbly
image edge that the full frame gives. I'd like to learn how some
people do their borders, like Mike Dixon.
-
<center>
<img src="http://www.alaska.net/~rowlett/images/330-25.jpg" width=485
height=711><p>
"Young Kid and Shovel"<br>
Fairbanks, AK, 2000
</center>
<p>
I hate html. And filenames. And computers.
-
<center>
<img src="http://www.alaska.net/~rowlett/images/330-25.htm" width=485 height=711>
<p>
"Young Kid and Shovel"<br>
Fairbanks, AK, 2000
</center>
-
<center>
<img src="http://www.alaska.net/~rowlett/images/homer.jpg" height=544 width=765>
<p>
"Fishermen, Homer, AK"
</center>
<p>
My apologies for the 183K size of this image, it probably shouldn't be that large.
Eyes!
in Portraits & Fashion
Posted
I very much like this entire thread. The visual and written arts
here nicely reflect my perceptions of the personalities of their
creators. Wow, thanks.