thequintessentialman

I'm a little late on this but anyone have any good tips they would share for photographing the eclipse? This is not something I've had a chance to practice trial and error. I'm aware of the potential damage by UV to human eyes but not seen or heard anything about electronics. (On a side note, Eclipse glasses appear to be IR filters around 750nm from my best guess.)

Had a box full of different effect filters I used with my old FE2 but never got any when I transitioned to digital. They were much too small so I gave them to a friend. There have been a few things I've wanted to do over the years but I just did without. Now I'm thinking of getting a polarizing filter and a neutral filter for my D800 lenses. The little bit of research I've done said NOT to get a linear polarizer for a digital, but to get a circular due to issues with the electronics.. Recall one of the cool things with my FE2 polarizer was it rotated; taking pictures of fish in water I could control how much glare I wanted in or out by rotating it. Will I be able to do that with the circular polarizer, the tutorial didn't mention anything like that. I'm considering a variable neutral density, what are the pros/cons of variable vs a set of fixed density? Any pitfalls or beginners' mistakes I need to be aware of? Had a bit of fun with those old filters though, got the starter kit at the BX, then some years later ran across a big box full at a yard sale. They were square and had a cradle that screwed into the end of the lens (forgot the brand name) but those old lens were tiny compared to the ones on the D800. Thanks

OK, so the take away here is to search the web with those tags and not just inside the photo.net website. getting much more useful information like that. thanks

Has anyone found a good sturdy collapsible "moses staff" that functions as a monopod when out hiking the back country? I have a 7' rattan staff I use with a camera clamp, it works well locally but not so well for flying. It's an ad hoc set up and can be a bit cumbersome so looking for a better solution.

Thanks but it's mostly for media and archival purposes. Right now we are just looking for some cheap storage that parents, students, and other patrons of the school can upload to. Guess I'm thinking more along the lines of a FTP site but with easier use.

One of my other hobbies is martial arts and we are trying to figure a way to get an inexpensive cloud space so parents, spouses, etc. (whomever) can upload pictures and video of events. I do a lot of still photography (rapidly becoming a dinosaur) and another guy does the video but most all the parents photo/video their child's, spouse's, etc. events. Some of it would be good fodder for the website promo but we are out of ideas on how to make it easy for people to send it in.

I got the Sport not long after it came out. Don't recall all the factors I looked at but determined the Sport to be the better option. I do recall it's weather sealed better although I try not to test that. I've been happy with it. Got a real cool pic of an eagle at Yellowstone the first vacation out with it. (Always wanted to take an eagle pic.) May be age and diminishing upper body strength but it's challenging to hand hold mounted on the D800 sometimes. It does like a lot of light in my experience. I have no regrets other than not enough time to travel with it...

mjferron: I do not disagree with you. The tools we choose are personal and based on many factors. My question here is just the technology and how some of the old guard (and new) that has made the transition, review it. A friend of mine (and much more accomplished photographer) recently transitioned not only to mirror-less but also from Nikon to Canon. I'm just curious what photography reasons other people have for getting with the new or staying with the old.

Haven't really been paying a lot of attention to "CSC" (mirror-less") until I saw the recent news that Nikon and Canon were betting the farm on this tech and abandoning SLR. From those of you that have or are shooting both, what has been your experience and what are the pros/cons as you see them?

The good news is it's beginning to look more and more like operator error. I removed the lens (as suggested) and took several shots with and without the remote release. It does behave a bit differently between the two though. With the release, the second momentary press opens the shutter, the third press releases the shutter and mirror. Just with the camera and no remote release, once the mirror is lifted the shutter behaves like a traditional bulb and stays open as long as the button is pressed. When the button is released it releases the shutter and mirror. Now wondering if I would have any different results with the Nikon OEM release. The indicator lights on this remote are a little confusing and I have to rely on hearing the mirror and shutter action. That would not have been an option last night during the fireworks.

Yes, that is one of the signs that lead me to this conclusion. I can hear the mirror lifting. On the second lite press I can hear the shutter opening. After a pause I hit the release a third time the process ends and then the picture displays on the screen. (FWIW, the camera ignores the remote in live view mode.) I tried several frames without the remote and it does not seem to record a picture.

So bench testing this thing and apparently bulb is now a three step process after setting the camera up. I can hear the mirror retract but then I have to hit the remote again to start recording the picture, then hit the remote a third time to stop recording. I don't know if this is a bug or a feature. Could be a consequence of using a 3dr party electronic remote release. Yes, the D800 is set to manual (M) and I scrolled through until it displays Bulb. The ISO is lowered to 100 although I've been playing around with different speeds.

Haven't played around with the Bulb setting in a few years, back when I was younger and shooting film a friend and I used to play around with it painting things with a flash light or putting halos around stuff. You know, fun things you do when you're young and on stand by at work (fireman) with nothing else to do. Used to get some decent fireworks photos too. Since going digital I haven't really played around with it and apparently that setting does not mean what it used to mean. On my old Nikon "bulb" was basically putting the clutch back in the ford. Squeeze bulb, shutter opens; release bulb, shutter closes. Last night attempting to shoot fireworks I found out that regardless of how long I keep the release pressed, the exposure is going to end when it wants to. The drill is to set camera (D800) on bulb, focus to infinity, and play around with the ISO until I get the results I want. Virtually all my shots came out at 1/3 sec even though I know I held the release for over 3, even 5 seconds on some of of the shots as well as kept playing around with the ISO. I am using an electronic remote release so maybe something is going on there. Any ideas? Fiddling around with it bench testing today, hope to get this figured out before next fireworks season.

Is NX Studio much of an improvement over View NX? Just curious. After some diligence I finally found a compatibility mode the View NX works with but no idea for how long... .

so I've gotten one too many windoz 10 updates and View NX has finally stopped working. Been playing around with compatibility mode but so far no luck. For a hobbyist that has already spent too much on equipment can anyone recommend a cost effective solution? Once the big names went to subscription they pretty much priced me out. Shooting D800 RAW. Thanks