tang_junfeng
-
Posts
10 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by tang_junfeng
-
-
<p>JDM thank you .for the website / yes, it is a good but not ecellent lense.. i fell satisfied for the price and not very big size photoes</p>
-
<p>ian, yes, the same with me . i live in china , severe haze every day . so i can only take pics in fews days of the yeay . other tmie always stay home inside for health .</p>
-
<p>mike i think the same . so i can save the money haha . if tb21 is ok, the th 200 is reaaly too much , change off the thtal platfrom means we spend several hunfred dollars only to but three leg sticks of gitzo</p>
-
<p>ian, yes , the flares seems very strong. copared with my AF35 2D, but the sharpness the same. also with my AIS501.2 I SHOT 100+photoes and ltiitle differeneces between them . if there is variaties is samples. maybe i happened to get a good one? haha<br>
wait for your feed back<br>
here are some i shot with it , the last 20 were shot with it te exif may show 28MM. that is because i input the non cpu data as 28mm to get good expousure</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickriver.com/photos/74600613@N02/">http://www.flickriver.com/photos/74600613@N02/</a></p>
<p> </p>
-
<p>well , IQ is not everything, i think a conpact ais28/f2 brings more fun than AF 2.8 . 52MM FILTHER is also benifet in saving money. the focus feeling also better. i have a AI28F2.8, hevily used, spending 90USD. i bought a ais28 f.28 new for 450usd, after comparision i find no differenc e at all and return the ais one.</p>
-
<p>Edward, thack you for your introduction </p>
<p>mike, many Nikonians website people say markins base is useful to make th etrpod stable and more light. but i can find no lighter at all in GT2541 , maybe they mean some other style of gitzo such as seires 3. about the stablity, they usually get conclusion from a atricle review form markins website. many say seems no difference form theri own comparision. maybe use of a markins can bring smoe change with telelenses like 400mm 500mm ? i want to have a stable set but dlislike to speng 90USD futher more. if no differrence can be seen wth my 180MM utmost focal length . the ground lvel set is very tight now i feel, maybe because i usually use 20 35 50 ais pimes which is very small size .</p>
-
<p>hi friends. i have a gt 2541 ,sine i seldom need the center pos i removed it for a year now shot in the ground level set. some suggest me to add a markins tb21 . but i donte want to spemd more. my question is:<br>
is the ground levle set is as stable as the origional with center column? <br>
are there someones also use a gt2541 /2531 without center column while no kirk or makins plate added to the tripoid? -------only use the ground level set style.</p>
<p>thank yu</p>
-
<p>thank you jim for the intrduction article . it give s a detailded discription to thge size weght numbers structyre and so on . futher more i want to get the feelingf and inmptression fo the lense owners, such as is it suitable to shoot landscape ? the cemter and coner sharpness same good ? the infinity focus is ok ? (mine seems soft somehow, at the 105mm focus far scenes) have any conmpairison with other zooms or primes ? the more the better .</p>
-
<p>helo frineds , i have just bought this old zoom lense mf to shoot countryside landscape and walk alround.<br>
few discussed so i see not much about it,<br>
is it a decent lense which can produce good images? the body is d700<br>
please share your exprience with it . i am intersterd about every details about it . its good and shotrcomings,and so on<br>
than ko you !</p>
how about 35-105mm f3.5-4.5 ais ?
in Nikon
Posted