gabriel_gerena

Yes it has case, caps and filters! Can't

wait.

Thanks :)

<p>Hello!<br>

So I used to have the normal FD 300mm 2.8 white but sold it and now for some reason got curious about trying this rare Fluorite version. <br /> Anyone else currently using one? <br /> I saw a test on another forum and liked how it was more contrasty and a bit longer than the white version but I understand with such old lenses, performance can vary a lot based on condition. <br /> We shall see!</p>

<p>Well July marks the month where i post my last images here. <br />Have fun everyone.<br />Regards</p>

<p><img src="https://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7481/27817697420_723cf2e511_o.jpg" alt="" width="2873" height="4320" /></p>

<p><img src="https://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7458/27133330022_19701bf2e4_o.jpg" alt="" width="1620" height="2160" /></p>

<p>A couple shots with the FD 300mm f2.8 beast on A7Rii. The bear is from Hogle Zoo in Utah. <br />The Wolf from <a href="http://www.grizzlydiscoveryctr.org/">Grizzly and Wolf Discovery Center </a>in Yellowstone. :)</p>

<p>Indeed they are so this "discovery" is VERY nice for me so I dont always have to use that monster hood but then again...I am so picky that the thought of maybe not getting the best contrast for not using it will likely push me to use the big hood anyways. LOL</p>

<p>Nice Alex! :)</p>

<p>Hello guys!<br />I am trying to determine if there is any difference in IQ between the two since I dont need IS (will be using it on A7Rii).<br>

I am going to be getting V1 as dont want to spend much more for V2.<br>

Thanks!</p>

 

<p>Yes, sounds dumb but I JUST realized that besides the big lens hood attachement, the lens actually has a built in hood. I wonder if you are supposed to extend that one and then add the attachement or does it really make any difference.<br />Anyways, goes to show that even after a long time, one can find out new stuff about your gear lol</p>

 

<p>Wow some amazing contributions. That lion looks awesome.<br />Here is a Lion cub with the FD 300mm F2.8 to keep the topic going :D<br>

<br />Here is the Flickr link for Full Quality.<br />https://www.flickr.com/photos/lgabrielg/26983165672/in/photostream/<br>

<br /><br /><img src="https://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7459/26983165672_57b8b0cf89_o.jpg" alt="" width="3184" height="2388" /><br /> <br />And here is the full image from where I did the above crop.<br /> <img src="https://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7223/27011788011_a5d07542cc_o.jpg" alt="" width="3235" height="2160" /></p>

<p>Thanks Alex S!<br />I cannot wait to go back with more time and better weather as I have several ideas on how to use this amazing lens. I shoot mostly native lenses these days, Zeiss, top Tamron ones like the 15-30mm F2.8 but this Canon FD 300mm has no problem keeping up with newer lenses. Its just marvelous :)</p>

<p>Almost the end of the month so lets post one I took with the FD 300mm F2.8. <br />I ran out of space to frame it how I wanted and it was bad weather so I took it this way. Planning to go again for more ideas I have with this monster lens and the A7Rii. :)<br>

<img src="https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1479/26628191505_632a79d802_o.jpg" alt="" width="1810" height="2800" /></p>

<p>So I am trying to help my brother to improve IQ from his kit zoom on the A57 on a VERY tight budget.<br>

Now he has the 50mm 1.8 which he likes a lot so I suggested instead of wasting money on a zoom as he cannot afford any more expensive ones, to look at at a wide prime instead. It seems a 24mm would be nice to complement his 50mm.<br>

So I found this one:<br />http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B000Y680HA/ref=dp_olp_used?ie=UTF8&condition=used<br>

As far as I know, if its AF minolta, it should work with the Sony A-mount, correct?</p>

 

<p>I want to share this one taken with the Canon FD 300mm F2.8.<br />Working on learning Portrait photography in my WIP basement "studio" :)<br>

<img src="https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5835/21534795363_a34d0602ed_o.jpg" alt="" width="1875" height="1440" /></p>

<p>Hello!<br />So I dont use a tripod that often to be honest, some times when going hiking with my wife I will take it to take at least one pic of us together and for moon shots but I think my current combination needs to be upgraded as either the head the both are not up to par.<br />In any case, for $200 or less ...what do you think of this Vanguard combo? The heaviest lens it will use will be the FD 300mm 2.8 with a couple of extenders on a Sony A7ii.<br>

I was looking at one that was able to become a monopod too but didnt look that strong.<br>

My current one is a Manfrotto 3001N with a Sunpak 620 Pistol Grip (I am sure this one is the super weak link). So let me know if I need to upgrade both or just the head please.<br />I wouldnt mind a lighter easier to handle tripod or at least one that is smaller when packed.<br />Thanks!</p>

<p>That is correct Dave S, it is a jacket like protector for the whole body. I do have the original case and a hoodie for the lens itself. :)</p>

<p>Like most lenses they tend to be not very sharp wide open, for example my FD 200mm 2.8 IF is "glowy" at F2.8 but razor sharp stopping down once. Or my FD 100mm F2. which is razor sharp at 2.8 as well but still quite nice at F2. <br />Of course some like my FD 300mm F2.8 are super sharp wide open so it varies.</p>

<p>Henry somehow clicking on the link just takes me back to the forum. Can you try again?<br>

Thanks!</p>

<p>I contacted them earlier and their dry response was, they have not tested any cover on that lens so they dont know if one will fit. Really not a very good image of customer service with that reply. :/</p>

<p>Hello!<br>

I was wondering if you guys have any suggestions for a Lens Coat like protection for the FD 300mm 2.8.<br>

I would like to protect it as much as possible.<br>

Thanks!</p>

<p>PS <br />Something like this style:<br>

https://photonaturalist.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/lens-coat.png just black if possible.</p>

<p>That Lama shot is awesome! Great start for September already from everyone so keep the momentum going. :)<br /><br />Here is my first day trying my "new" Canon FD 300mm F/2.8 with extenders. This one was with the 1.4x-A</p>

<p>https://www.flickr.com/photos/lgabrielg/20916193770/in/photostream/<br /> <br />Use the above link to see it in all its Detail as it should be done because these "old" lens its amazingly sharp! <br /> <img src="https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5666/20916193770_5eae47848f_o.jpg" alt="" width="5404" height="3668" /></p>

<p> </p>

<p>Thanks John!!!!</p>

<p>Thanks Alex :)</p>

<p>Well looks like I blew it then as I got the 2x-A so depending on the results I will get the B and compare them myself. :/</p>

<p>Steven, that seems to go against the research I have done although I have seen people claim they have tried both and didnt notice a thing. I wish Canon's explanation was clearer but at least here it seems to indicate for 300mm and longer I should be using the 2X-A<br>

http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/companies/canon/fdresources/fdlenses/extenders.htm</p>

<p>"The <strong>FD </strong><strong>2X-A</strong><strong> extender doubles the focal length of the prime lens and is designed for use with any lens with a 300mm focal length or longer</strong>, including zoom lenses with 300mm within their range. Using the FD 2X-A converts the 880mm lens to 1600mm, while retaining a minimum shooting distance of 14 meters. The FD <strong>2X-B</strong><strong> extender doubles the focal length of any lens with a focal length of less than 300mm</strong>, including zoom lenses with 200mm within their range. "</p>

<p>Hello!<br>

I got the 1.4X coming in so just need the 2X-A but have read interesting things about the Kiron 7 element (not sure if they are all 7 elements) and can find it cheaper.<br />Is the Canon still the best quality?</p>