roger_mamer

Then there is one more thought. I noticed that with my nikon, my 135mm

telephoto, which has macro focus, seems to have better depth of field

at f11. Could the distance to subject have an affect on depth of

field also? I know the physics of it, It just seems to be better.

Maybe I just need more tests.

Thanks

I have a 500C/M, and an 80 mm lense. I do close up photography

with my nikon, and now I would like to do it with my 500C/M

What I was wondering was how the depth of field is different

for different types of equipment. My 500 C/M came with a 21

close up attachment. With this attachment, even at the say f16,

the depth of field is about 2/32 of an inch. My question

is would bellows have a better depth of field, or a macro lens,

or the Proxars filters?

I am new to hasselblad cameras. But I have been doing a lot of reading

to get upto speed. I purchased a 1973 500 c/m. So far I am love this

equipment. My question is I would like to do some double exposures.

But I am not quite sure how to do it on the 500 c/m.

Do I take the back off, then wind the film advance, and put

the back back on?