kyorston

December 14, 2007

This is a lovely scene - some of the lights are a little blown out - you may get a better result if you reduced the time exposure slightly. The reciprocity failure rate is very hard to predict from one film to another - maybe bracketing will give you a better idea of required exposure time.

December 14, 2007

Anatoly, the previous comment is correct - great eye! As photographers we need to be always on the lookout for these images - so often we just look 'through' puddles or windows and don't see the reflection.

December 14, 2007

Josh, Good on you for going against your 'norm'. I love the content - did you take any other shots of this, at slightly different angles? I'd love to see the corner of the construction emerge from exactly the bottom right hand corner of the frame.

December 14, 2007

I'd like to see you do a series of images that had the same 'feel' - this looks as if it was dredged out of a creek. There must be a wealth of similar stuff out there. The background is perfect.

December 14, 2007

Helen, you've managed to get a wide range of focus in this shot - the eyes of both geese are quite sharp - it's just a pity that you didn't stand back a little further so that you could include the legs and tail feathers of the bird in the foreground, because it would have made the image so much more attractive. Well done for the detail.

December 3, 2007

Would appreciate any feedback.

November 16, 2007

I know there are more spectacular photos of Moab's scenery, but does

the moon give it that little extra?

November 16, 2007

Baseball is not the most popular sport in Australia, so when I

ventured out to capture its fans, I struggled. Does this image tell

enough of that story?

November 16, 2007

Everyone before me has said it, but I have to repeat that it is a magnificent photo - a wall hanger! A competition winner. Congratulations.

November 16, 2007

A careful crop would have made this image so much better. The horizon is a little crooked, and there is the beginning of a sign on the right hand side. And I'm dying to know what the horizontal limb off the dark construction is connected to.

November 16, 2007

I love this shot, but I think it could benefit from a tighter crop, to reduce the space at the bottom of the image, and maybe photoshop out the shadow on the left.

November 16, 2007

How much more satisfied I would be as a viewer, if I could see the bottom of the bottle and the glasses on the right.

February 6, 2004

It's a warts-and-all portrait of a grubby little boy - as most little boys are. And I think the background adds to the mood. I'd like to see a little more detail in his eyes - maybe a touch of dodging.

February 6, 2004

Good subject, good lighting and the print has a good level of contrast.

February 6, 2004

"Not Digitally Manipulated"

February 6, 2004

I was looking for delicate here - does it capture the beauty?

March 29, 2003

I agree about the cellulite - I think these days we are too hung up on fatty tissue in all its manifestations. Your criticism of the floor boards is much more justified!! Thank you. Kathleen

February 15, 2003

Subtle studio lighting was used here, with a white background, to

get a 'natural lighting' look. I think that the sepia toning adds

to the 'natural' look. No digital enhancement has been used. I

would appreciate any comments or criticisms.

October 17, 2002

You have captured innocence and excitement in this image. I love it.

October 17, 2002

I would appreciate any comments on this photograph. It was taken

with natural light - a black backdrop was placed behind it for

contrast.

August 2, 2002

Vadim, I really liked the hand on the shoulder - it changed the photo from being just a portrait, to saying something about the subject - he has a friend. Very good.