Jump to content

kc

Members
  • Posts

    116
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by kc

  1. I know what you mean about catch fencing. Catch fencing also eliminates the use of flash as it just lights up the fence. The pros who had infield access were all using huge parabolic reflectors on raised flash kits with huge rapid rate batteries so they could shoot continuously with their flash. I had shot several rolls of Kodak Max Zoom 800 in daylight and was disapointed so I had stayed away from 800 speed film. A few guys recommended Fuji Superia 800 and I was impressed with the color and the detail that was captured. For C41 consumer film I thought it performed quite well. The relative dimness of the images is exactly how it looked inside the International Petroleum Expo building that night. And with the airborne dust it gives the impression of an underexposed image.

     

    I found out that the requirements for a press pass are fairly lax for the Chili Bowl and I will try to get infield access next year.

     

    I would love to own a high power parabolic flash but the things cost more than my current kit does and I just don't use it enough to warrant the cost.

  2. I took these shots from trackside at the Chili Bowl Midget Nationals

    indoor race. The poor lighting and dust level encouraged the use of

    Fuji Superia 800 and I thought they came out well. I could not fire

    on full automatic as I had to manually focus my Rebel, its not just

    fast enough on autofocus.

     

    Let me know what you think.

  3. I snapped this image of a cheetah who finally came out from the shady

    cover where he and his mates were nigh impossible to photograph. Any

    comments and suggestions are greatly appreciated.

  4. I bent down to take this image of a crucifix backlit in the early

    morning sun and saw this. I did not take the image to enforce any

    type of political agenda or religious orientation. But, I am

    wondering what this holds for the viewer. Please no

    political/religious rants.

  5. This photo was taken in downtown Tulsa on a local catholic church.

    This angel relief with shield stands guard over the main entrance to

    the chapel. The image was taken around 1 hour after sunrise with

    Kodak TMax 400. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to make this

    better?

  6. Nothing wrong with the shot. I like the concept of the Saab Viggen and the open sky. A tie in to Saab's Viggen interceptor aircraft. However, I think that for this type of image to work it must inform the viewer as to the product. Most people, auto enthusists included, would not know that this is a Saab. Possibly using a characteristic of the car that associated with the car or maker(ie: the non typical shape of the car itself). Many auto images work because of the emotional tug people get from seeing a Corvette crossed flag logo, or the characteristic 5 spoke wheel on a Ferrari, or the running horse insignia on a Mustang.
  7. I like the image. But my criticism is tainted because I am a big Franchitti fan. I like the composition of the blurred cars ahead and behind his more focussed Reynard. Nice. Gives the sensation of the speed into and out of the corner while showing the point of the apex.

     

    Is this taken at the Andretti Hairpin?

    Focus

          3
    As a huge racing fan I can easily see the focus of the pair. They are considering how much their hard work will net them at the race it seems to me. However, I can also see the confusion if the viewer is not a racing fan. An explanatory caption may be in order.
×
×
  • Create New...