john_marrs1

<p> Yes the Nikon 3200 doesn't have double the resolution of say a 12mp camera. The Nikon 3200 has double the resolution of a 6mp camera. So the resolution increase isn't anything to rave about. I have the KX and am waiting on a 48mp camera to double the resolution. I do want the K5 II with some limited lenses. It does look good.</p>

<p> I've been debating the same question. I have a Pentax KX 12mp. To double the resolution I'd have to buy a 48mp sensor. I decided to improve the glass rather than shell out the money on the sensor upgrade and that has made a huge difference. Pentax limited lenses are shockingly good. Between the regular kit lens, you'd think I slapped a Zeiss on there. The image improvement is that good.<br>

Maybe someone who has both FX & DX could post comparisons using top of the line glass. This could let us see if there is a $2000 difference in quality.<br>

<br />Wouldn't want to have buyer's remorse after purchasing an expensive FX & finding out the improvement was barely noticeable.<br>

<br /><br /></p>