Jump to content

deutsh_nehmman

Members
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by deutsh_nehmman

  1. I think.... After replies , the great build up body will cost

    difference ... I agree with that, I made a comparison

    between D7100 vs D300s . In external body and found

    that body of D300s is bigger than D7100, besides the

    quality of material of body is different. I think all of you is

    right, the D300s even heavier.

    I am so appreciate for everyone.... Thanks a lot

  2. What can I say.... Good build up means hight price even

    with low features (when compare with D7100) .?!!.

    Did you think the pixel size can make this hi price. Cause I

    don't think the nikon insane to put this price , and they

    know very well no one will buy it (if compared with

    D7100). Don't you think that?

  3. Hi everybody , I am thankful for your replies, I read your

    posts and discover a question, D300s is about 1600 $ in

    amazon because it's expensive price when first release in

    2009?!!!..

    If I want to buy a new one I am sure to by the best in ISO,

    pixels resolution, movie resolution, frame rate and Auto

    focus points. That mean I'll buy the D7100. But..... (i hope

    to know why).... Amazon not in 2009 they in 2014..... why?

    Everyone who want to buy new one ..... Sure he will

    choose the low price and great features.... Thats mean

    D7100.

    He don't care about the external, bigger in handle. He

    wants a great result with low price.

    From this I think amazon have to get an advice to

    discounts the price of D300s. Because no one will buy it.

    (that's true).

    Besides of all that I am asked about the price because I

    really want to know the reason..... Really want to know(I

    don't want to buy D300s.)

  4. Hi my question is so simple

    Why the nikon D300s body only price is more than body

    only of D7100. But D7100 is best in everything when

    compare with D300s. Did that mean a something I don't

    know about D300s.

    Please I want answer.

    Note : the first release price of D300s about 1900$, but the

    first released price of D7100 is 1200$.?!!!..... Why? :-!

  5. I know I have 16-85mm but I ask

    about the sharpness of it with

    comparsion with others

    (18-105 and 18-300mm) to buy the

    one of the others or dont buy

    anyone because of they lower than

    what I have .

    That my question

  6. <p>hello everyone sory for late cause busy. anyway,I Thanks for all , about your respons i think its (D200 sharper than D7000) because of three things 1-the CCD sensor is best than CMOS sensor, and 2-some lens have to cailbrate a AF fine tune.and 3-the D200 maybe don't have antialaising filter. thats what I think .<br>

    with thanks</p>

     

  7. <p>Hi evrey one I want to explain something :I have nikon d200 and d7000 + nokkor 16-85mm vr .<br>

    when I use this lens with d200, the image better in sharpness than d7000 ,inspite of the to pictures taken with same iso,aprture,shutter speed ,and of course the same focus point.<br>

    note :d200 older than d7000 but the image of d200 is better .... wwwwhhhhyyyyyy.<br>

    did d200 or d300 are better than d3100,d5000,d7000 ? or what?<br>

    with thanks.</p>

  8. <p>Hi guys ,,,,please let me explane somthing .... I asked that quastion because of my friend told me that accessories of cars wich it imported from japan refused and send it back cause the radioactive contamnation wich is found in this accessories .<br>

    I AM JUST Wonders IS THAT TRuE</p>

  9. <p>HI .... everybody ,<br />I have a serious Question ."I want to purchase a tamron 17-50mm f 2.8 ,and it s <strong>made in japan</strong> ...<br />japan have a <strong>Disaster of radioactive contamnation after fukushema dichi</strong> ,my quastion is "<strong>IF I purchase this lens did I have a radioactive contamenation ?</strong> " there is a <strong>Prove</strong> it not harmful ,<br />seriously I need this lens cause it wide aprture and its so sharp with good price,<br />what did you think , please dont think its just jock.<br />Whith thanks</p>
  10. Hi folks and everyone get aquastion ?

    When I use phaseone media pro for my photos >>>its <strong>appear</strong>

    more sharp (not exactly sharp )but more good in appearance

    but when I use adobe lightroom for browsing the same images I found different in quality.

    media pro is so good in browsing the photos .(good in color ,sharpness ,vibrance)

    my think is: did the photos so good but need a good program like media pro or its <strong>pseudoquality</strong></p>

    (by the way ,media pro did not have pre setting to photos )</p>

  11. <p>HI ....folks hi everyone ... well about the meaning of "so so" I mean "very very or double-so as <a href="../photodb/user?user_id=6819317">Ariel </a> says. <br>

    Ill be a More accurate about details ,I get nikon d300s with a kit lens 18-55mm from nikon ,but the zoom is ...... ,therfore i decided to purchase a new lens with hight zoom capacity.<br>

    then i get tamron 18-270mm vc pzd.but the sharpness not excellent .<br>

    and that is all story .<br>

    well.......I want a Advice to purchase a new lens better than 18-55mm and 18-270mm .<br>

    with thanks.</p>

  12. <p>Hi everyone ....iam very well thank you about responding .<br>

    by the way my camra is d300s and the lens is tamron 18-270mm vc pzd , BUT BUT BUT this lens is not sharp photos can take , therfore I want a sharp image by sharp lens .<br>

    with thanks</p>

×
×
  • Create New...