andoni_mesa_bravo

<table id="post361038" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="6" width="100%" align="center">

<tbody>

<tr valign="top">

<td id="td_post_361038" >

Hi all . I know that always ask rare questions but i need to know .<br /><br />Do you know if touching that part to clean it very softly will damage or move the sensor position...or something.<br /><br />Please would be very happy if someone will know about it<br /><br />thanks so much

</td>

</tr>

</tbody>

</table>

<p>I wish i have the hasselblad h4d 40 already :-b .<br>

The software at the end is soo important for me because i shoot 97% of the time tethered to the computer and for me is so important have all the settings i need to don t touch any color in photoshop : just to have a software where from the raw you can puss everything.<br>

For other side the 1/speed of the phase one 645df</p>

<p>he,he,he i don t complain :-) i fill very relax wile i am working <br>

YEP I am gonna be honest with my needs.<br>

I love the hasselblad h4d 40 but i need faster s/speed at list up to 1/1600<br>

Since 4 years now i work with capture one and all my workflow in my hard disk are all about capture one structure<br>

Soo i think i will purchase the 645DF with p40+ with 80mm LS.<br>

I have a question about LEAF SHUTTER LENSES<br>

Do i have to mount another lens on the camera if i want to shoot at 1/4000 with the 80mm LS lens or the camera will use its own FOCAL PLANE shutter . FOR EXAMPLE<br>

I AM SHOOTING WITH THE 80MM LS lens at 1/800 and i want to go to 1/3200.<br>

Do i have to mount the non leaf shutter lens on the camera?<br>

another example:<br>

I AM SHOOTING WITH THE 80MM LS lens at 1/50 and i want to slow down to 3 second<br>

Do i have to mount the non leaf shutter lens on the camera?</p>

<p>I sorry i have been working the hole day.<br>

My question was about the hasselblad h4d 40 system .<br>

Some time i like to shoot darken a bit the background wile i fill with a flash to make a lot of constrast in a sunny day.<br>

THE PHASE ONE 645DF CAMERA OFFERS 1/4000 SPEED BUT I REALLY LOVE THE HASSELBLAD SYSTEM H4D 40 FOR MANY REASONS BUT WITH A 1/800 SPEED AND ISO 100 I THINK MY ONLY SOLUTION IS TO PUT A ND FILTER ,BUT I ASUME THAT IT TAKES ME OFF A BIT OF IQ.<br>

Sorry i think i meant to less DOF so...more blured backgroud</p>

<p>iso 100</p>

<p>I have a question about shutter speed on hasselblads<br>

During a very sunny day and with the maximun shutter speed that hasselblal limits .At wich aperture do you shoot at 1/800s and trying to have DOF on the background?<br>

shooting with my nikon d3x at f5.6 i have to set my shutter speed at 1600 for right exposure and if i want to underexpose the background i have to go 1/3200...</p>

 

<p>Nice PICTURE... :-) </p>

<p>One stupid question.<br>

Has the hasselblad h4d 40 an anti-aliasing filter? Because im trying to find out but i don t find anything.<br>

I start looking at this product now because is more new tecnology back .<br>

Some of you have work with this product?<br>

Do you know if it has a MF field even if its a 33x44mm sensor size?<br>

THANKS FOR YOUR TIME :-)</p>

<p>the p 45 + system will be on a 645df with 80mm lenses ls.</p>

<p>the new body from phase one ( 645 FD ) WITH THE SCHNEIDER LENS SEEMS TO BE VERY GOOD but i like the body from phase one and the true phocus works very ewll so....the main thing that scares me is the software , so i would not want to choose a camera because of the software</p>

<p>HI ALL AGAIN :-)!!!!<br>

After a very helpfull POST about MF and 35mm with same resolution ...now i clear my needs and i would like to know your opinions about this new post:<br>

I decided to go for something i m honest with.<br>

I m between this two system: hasselblad h4d 50 and phase one p45+<br>

About the p45+ i like that i can work with capture one as i know the software since few years now.Also like the relation between pixel and sensor size.<br>

About the hasselblad h4d 50 i also like the relation pixel-sensor size but scare me a bit the software as i dont know how it works very well but when i have been playing with the PHOCUS software seems that it is not as complete as capture one is. Also like about the hasselblad h4d 50 that is more new tecnology than phase one p45+</p>

<p>THANKS SOO MUCH AGAIN :-)</p>

<p>DO YOU GUYS SHOOT TETHERED?</p>

<p>i work with mac but i hear that phocus gets crazy when you shot tethered after a wile</p>

<p>I mean if you are shooting tethered if the system gets crazy or something like that.<br>

I shoot always tethered and each sesion is around 1000 pics so...</p>

<p>I shoot thedered all the time in my work and id like to know if you no the software and if it has a lot of issues wile shooting tethered<br>

Thanks all again</p>

<p>Ray<br>

I like your opinion and i would like to ask you some thing<br>

When you speak about that the h4d 40 is the little brother of the h4d 50 you mean that the chip of the h4d 40 is the same but kodak have cut the chip smaller?<br>

for me the specs of the h4d 50 are the right ones for what i do.<br>

thanks for your response<br>

i d like to open a new question about what people now about phocus software from hasselblad<br>

thanks so much everybody. ALL OF YOUR RESPONSES HAVE BEEN VERY HELPFULL FOR ME :-)</p>

<p>totally agree!!!i m sure you are gonna love it :-)for a looooooong time</p>

<p>hi <a href="../photodb/user?user_id=419409">Edward Ingold</a> you are right i m gonna said something to share and have fun :-)<br>

Going back to the real question on this i have to say that i was curios to see what was the opinion about Md and 35mm systems with the same amount of PX.<br>

I have a very good chance of getting in MF camera for a littel money...but at the end i already have a nikon d3x that works great and if i want to get into MF i want to go into a new tecnology MF with is one of the main features of MF systems.<br>

The main features of MF systems are at the end , more MP , bigger sensor, high sync speed , and the feeling of having deeper images that is very important to me.<br>

I not speaking about very tecnical things because for me at the end is more a practique thing.<br>

For example:The sensors of the cameras are not built for our cameras, they are built for a general porposes and are cuted in diferent sizes ....some pieces goes for mobiles,others bigger piezes for the NASA.....is not a photographer who tells how must be a chip, because if it will be like this the MF chips will be 64x64 , 12micron the size, and that in the real world is very very very espensive.That is why they put a lot of MP together on a chip .<br>

My nikon d3x has a lot of MP all together on the chip with 5,8 micron size and works great ,like it will a MF system of 37x49 with 50PM because also for my experiance the more MP the more DR and DETAIL.I had the d700 with a big micron size and all thoose things and when i change to the nikon d3x was very a new step on image quality.<br>

About how the lenses works on 35mm or MF i have to say that both are very good but the way i work , i never go to F1.4 or F2.8. The maximum i open is at F4 so with MF to have the same DOF it will be ok F. 7 and i will win more in IQ.<br>

MF is an incredible system but just when it makes sense, i mean ,Get MF with all the ultimate tecnology as you will with 35mm.One of the advantages of MF is megapixel count with nice size of micron ( 6 )and sensor size,(and when i say big sensor i mean all the beautyfull things that means.<br>

I am sure the diferences between a micron size of 9 and 6 no one could tell</p>

 

<p>ok David papas that was a great response for me ,very helpfull, as i would not like to deal with thoose kind of things after spending money so i think i will wait for anotheR oportunty to upgrade to MF.<br>

Thanks so much :-)</p>

<p>for me the easiest thing to do will be to buy a iq180 MF system but unfortunatly it is a matter of money. That is why i am asking about the p25 back.<br>

I like the perpective you get with it and change the camera wile working.</p>

<p>what do you think about 33x44mm size sensor? I d like to now why new MF sensor are smaller like p40+, p30+, h4d31 ,h4d40... It is better to have a smaller sensor? i thougt it was better to have a bigger sensor size</p>

<p>maybe i should wait another eternity and buy a p45+ or p40 + ....but the p25 back has a very good price with just 2500 exposures...(3000euros)...i would not want to loose the chance .<br>

Another thing i like about the p25 is thas the sensor measures 36x49 and for example the p40+ measures 33x44 with i realy do not understand why they call 33x44 MEDIUM FORMAT.it is not even double of a 35mm camera and has the same micron size as my nikon d3x.<br>

The price of a p40+ is about 16000euros just the back :-0 and the p45+ is about 22000 euros :-0000(</p>

<p> </p>

<p>So... do you think that it would be a nice thing to have the nikon d3x and phase one p25 together?<br>

my hasselblad 503 cw has the carl zeiss planar 80 2.8 CF .<br>

Im getting crazy...y dont now what to do...</p>

<p>thanks for the response:-)<br>

I m not very clear about the image quality diferences on thoose two systems.<br>

Some people says that the pixels on MF are diferent than thoose on 35mm.<br>

I shoot fashion and the way i work i dont need speed...so i need opinions :-)</p>

<p>Hi all i am new in forum :-)<br>

I have a nikon d3x and i am about purchasing a phase one p25 v mount back with 2200 exposures for 3000 euros.<br>

my question is that if it is and stupid thing as i have the nikon d3x with about the same amount of PX.<br>

I like the medium format field and DOF over the 35mm and i have the hasselblad 503 cw already.</p>

<p>Sorry about my english and thanks for you time</p>