steve_r.2

<p>Thanks for the feedback everyone. I am going to order the case with the grip.<br>

All the best,<br>

Steve</p>

<p>Hello,<br>

I'm thinking about buying a Luigi half-case for my MP. I'm interested in the case with the built-in grip, however, I'm worried that the grip will put the shutter release in an uncomfortable position. The only grip cameras that I've had experience with are modern DSLR's and the shutter release is positioned on the top of the grip which is natural and comfortable. I'm worried that the release on the M will be too far rear. I really don't want to drop that kind of coin on this only to find out that it doesn't work well.<br>

Can anyone shed any light on this?<br>

Thanks</p>

<p>Thanks Mark. I haven't tried that yet, but I will.</p>

Thanks everyone, I think...

 

Seriously, for those who actually gave tips, thank you. For the record, I have read the manual. I was looking for lessons learned. To

answer a couple of questions that were asked earlier. I was using a D300S, although lately I have been shooing with a Fuji X100. I m

mainly into shooting architecture, and street scenes. I've never owned a Canon DSLR, so I'm still getting used to it as I'm obviously more

comfortable with Nikon. So far, I really like how it shoots. If anyone else can share things they have learned that aren't specifically called

out in the manual, please let me know.

 

Regards,

 

Steve

Thanks Mark.

 

And thanks Peter, that was really helpful.

I just picked up a 6D and so far I really like the feel of it and how it shoots. It is, however, very complex like all high-end cameras. I am

looking for any tips from other 6D owners that will help me get the most of it.

 

Thanks,

 

Steve

Thanks for the feedback everyone. This would be primarily for shooting sports. It sounds like the 70-300VR is the way

to go.

Should I get the 70-300VR or should I opt for the 18-200 VR DX? I can get them both used locally for a decent price. I like the

compactness and range on the wide angle of the 18-200, but the 70-300 seems smoother. I've been told that the 70-300 is sharper

as well.

 

Any thoughts?

<p><a href="http://s762.photobucket.com/albums/xx270/stever-photo/?action=view&current=020-1.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i762.photobucket.com/albums/xx270/stever-photo/020-1.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket" /></a><br>

I took this photo as part of a scavenger hunt for a class that I'm taking this semester. It was taken with my Fuji X100 shot at 1/60 and f/11.</p>

<p>Thanks guys. This helps.</p>

<p>Michael, what Jose is showing here is the the problem. Even with my D300s, I've having a hard time getting grainy images at 6400. My instructor asked me to show some examples of poor quality images at higher ISO, and frankly I'm not able to produce them. My only other camera is a Fuji X100 and it's even better at high ISO than my Nikon. I uess this is the trouble with advancements in technology!!</p>

<p>I've been asked to present at my Digital Photography class this weekend on ISO and one of things I'm looking for is examples of photos where the photographer has used high ISO intentionally to create a grainy effect. Can anyone share any examples? I've searched the net, but I'm not coming up with anything good.<br>

Thanks,<br>

Steve</p>

<p>Here is a shot of an old Buick Roadmaster that has been totally neglected. I pass it almost everyday and this morning I decided to stop and capture a few shots. This was taken with my D300s.<br>

<img src="http://i762.photobucket.com/albums/xx270/stever-photo/049-1-3.jpg" alt="" /></p>

<p>Here is a shot looking up from under the tent at Arizona State University's Skysong Research Center in Scottsdale, AZ.</p>

<p><img src="http://i762.photobucket.com/albums/xx270/stever-photo/023-Edit-2-1-1.jpg" alt="" /></p>

<p>Horseshoe Fountain in Old Town Scottsdale, AZ</p>

<p>Thanks Richard, I was hitting the selector button instead of the OK. <br>

Point taken Joe. I should just get into the habit of selecting the delete after download option. That would solve the problem.</p>

A couple of days ago in my photography class, the instructor recommended getting into the habit of reformatting the card(s) in your

camera before every shoot so that you are starting fresh. I tried this yesterday and my SD card won't format. It's not locked. The

option is available in the menu, but when I hit ok, nothing happens. The card is currently formatted and I can record and delete

pictures with no problems.

 

Any thoughts?

Mike,

 

To be honest, that's why I was asking this question because I didn't think it would have much value because of the

huge volume of photos of her. I still don't think it's probably worth that much, but he can pursue it.

 

Steve

Keith,

 

What's interesting is that he has the negatives for the other shots that he took of her, but he can't find the one of the

good shot. He has looked everywhere. I live in Arizona. The photographer in question has had his work published for

decades; most frequently by Arizona Highways magazine. I will recommend that he contact a reputable appraiser and

go from there.

 

William, I appreciate the feedback as well.

 

A.T., if I learn anything, I'll let you know.

I recently met my neighbor who is 92. He has been a professional photographer his entire adult life. He is e sweetest guy you have

ever met. He invited me over for coffee and pastries the other day to show me some of his work. In approx. 1954, Marilyn Monroe

was in town filming Bus Stop and he was able to get a few shots of her. One is a very good close up of her boarding a carriage that

he was able to get her to pose. Her smile is stunning. He used his Hasselblad. It's printed to 11x17, but unfortunately the negative is

nowhere to be found. He is interested in selling the photograph, but does know what the value is. I'd like to help him if possible.

Does anyone have any idea how much it would be worth? I know there have been a million pictures of her taken over the years, so I

have no idea at all.

 

Thoughts?

" The 7000 needs to be wider" You mean like a D300(s)? Then it wouldn't be a D7000!

 

Touché

Dieter,

 

That is the exact problem that I was having. The battery grip would not have solved it for me either. The 7000 needs

to be wider in my opinion, although based on sales, it appears that we are in the minority.

I just wasn't able to bond with my D7000 from a physical perspective. It just didn't fit my hand properly and I was never able to really

get comfortable with it, so I returned it while I still could. I found a very lightly used D300s in perfect condition that a local chap was

selling for $1000 so I grabbed it. It fits me like a glove. I'm sure that many will think this is a step backwards, however, I am more

inspired by this camera. when I pick it up. I prefer the viewfinder as well.

 

Just thought I'd share my excitement. Me and my 300s (and 24mm f/2.8) are off to take some pics!!!!

<p>David,<br>

Thanks. That is exactly what I was originally looking for.<br>

Regards,<br>

Steve</p>

<p>Thanks for all the responses. I'm sticking with the D7000. Matt, I especially appreciate your comments. I need to find a place where I can check out the Sigma 30 f/1.4 as it may be exactly what I need. I'd also like to check out those Nikon zooms. Unfortunately, where I live there are no good shops at all.<br>

Thanks again.</p>