daniel_moorhead

<p>In the September issue of Shutterbug magazine, Scott Kelby, in answering a query regarding the "first setting he changed when he received a new camera" replied that with a Canon DSLR, he changed the center button function. He said that "when checking the sharpness is just one click away (rather than three clicks to zoom in, and three to zoom back out, which is a pain), you'll start using it more. On Canon DSLRs, this assignable button is called the "Setting Button" (the one in the center of the Quick Dial).<br>

Well, I have gone through the menus on my 6D and although I can find the area for setting the center button, I cannon seem to find a setting for checking sharpness. Realizing that I may be missing his point, I would like for someone to set me straight, perhaps referring to a section of the manual. Thanks in advance.<br>

Dan</p>

<p>I purchased a refurbished 6D from Canon about a year ago. Cost was around $1,300 without lens. Turned out that it had about 600 clicks on it and was in perfect shape complete with a one year warranty. It has worked like a dream with absolutely no problems. I have also purchased a couple of refurbished lenses from KEH with similar results. So far, my advice would be as long as the dealer is reputable, you can't go wrong with refurbished quality plus there are significant savings to be had. Go for it.</p>

<p>Thanks for the input. Referencing the WANT of a piece versus the NEED of a piece is always the dilemma that we face when contemplating a new replacement purchase, be it camera, automobile or even a spouse. Proudly, my spouse and I have been at it together now for almost forty-four years with no major thoughts of trading or selling. As far as the 5D/6D issue is concerned, my heart says to go for it and purchase the 6D while my logical mind tells me to keep my money and the 5D. I know that in the long run my photography will not be significantly affected with the new purchase, but I really would like to have those new fangled features and capabilities included as part of the 6D. Where is that darned coin that I use to make these decisions?<br>

Thanks<br>

Dan</p>

<p>I am a hobbyist who shoots grand kids, flowers and landscape. I have a Canon 60D and a faithful 5D Classic. I use them both and readily see the differences as well as the similarities. All but one of my lenses will fit the 5D. My question revolves around the technology, or rather, lack of technology, of the 5D. The camera is several years old and is getting kind of long in the tooth. I recently had it serviced by Canon which included reattaching the problematic shutter. The camera has been certified as being up to factory specs. A really great camera. It still does very well for its design, but my mouth is watering to upgrade to a 6D. I know the 6D has quite a bit of technological advantages, including video, that leave my old 5D in the starting blocks. The biggest disadvantage, at least as I see it, however, is the low ISO range of the 5D as compared to the 6D, which, as I understand, does very well in low light.<br /><br />I would appreciated anyone who has used both the 5DClassic and 6D to give me some insights, recommendations and ownership advice and comparisons. Many thanks in advance.<br />Dan</p>

<p>I checked out the specs, but did not see any reference to the materials of construction of the frame and body. Anyone hazard a guess?<br>

Dan</p>

<p>Not sure if this is the correct place for this posting, but here goes:<br>

I just received an email from Adobe offering CS6 at a discounted price of $199, which is $400 off the original price. According to Adobe, the discount is offered as a way of enticement to upgrade from Elements to Photoshop. I have Elements 8 and was anticipating upgrading to Elements 11 when it is offered which, I assume, would be in the near future. I am mostly a hobbyist and have been quite comfortable with Elements, but at this price offering for CS6, I was wondering if it would be worth it to do the upgrade or just wait for the new Elements which, I assume, would be offered for around $100. My question: would the extra $200 price tag for CS6 be worth it to me or should I just wait for the new Elements to be issued and purchase it instead? Is Photoshop that much better than Elements?</p>

<p>Thanks<br>

Dan</p>

 

<p>Thanks to all for the great responses. They are appreciated and have provided much food for thought. I am always amazed at the expertise that is available free of charge and freely given by all who participate in this forum. <br>

Sooooo.....based on all the responses and my budget, I took a shallow plunge and purchased a used Tamron 28-75 on Ebay. It certainly lacks in some areas, but seemed to fit most of my requirements, especially the budgetary one.<br>

<br />Thanks again,<br>

Dan</p>

<p>I just purchased an older Canon 5D Classic. It is full frame and some of the lenses that I presently own will not work. I find that I need a wide to short tele zoom. I am looking at the Tamron 28-75 f2.8 and the Sigma 24-70 f2.8. I plan to purchase it used on Ebay or Craigslist, depending on the deal and description. Any advice from you guys would be appreciated. My other camera is a 60D, not that that matters much.</p>

<p>Thanks<br>

Dan</p>

<p>Thanks to all for the great responses. They are quite varied. I will weigh them all and hopefully be able to make an informed and intelligent decision. I may just do nothing and hold on to the funds since it appears that my situation is not too bad and as long as I have the money, I will have potential alternatives.<br>

Thanks<br>

Dan</p>

<p>Okay, here's the deal. I am a retiree who likes photography as a hobby. I enjoy all types of photography, but my favorite is probably macro due mostly to the fact that the subjects either are very slow or don't move at all. I also enjoy landscapes, but my opportunities are limited. My two grand children occupy my interests in portrait photography. I have tried birding, but don't seem to have the patience necessary become good. To these ends I have a Canon nifty-fifty 1.8, a Canon 85 1.8, a Sigma 105 f2.8 macro without OS, a tamron 10-24, tamron 70-300, a couple of Sigma walk-arounds (17-70 and 18-250, both OS) and an older Sigma 170-500 f5.0-6.5. My question is that I have tripped and fallen into about $1,000 that I can use for the purchase of another lens to add to my repertoire. I am considering the Canon 100 f2.8 IS, but I would also like to include one of the Canon 70-200's (probably a used f4.0, either with or without IS). </p>

<p>Are there any recommendations from you guys. You all seem to be very astute when it comes to equipment needs evaluation. Thanks in advance for any responses.<br>

Dan</p>

 

<p>Herbert -<br>

Thanks for the info. Regarding the Canon loyalty program, it is my understanding that in order to take advantage of the program, one must have a broken Canon camera which is out of warranty. My 60D, which is my only Canon camera, is in perfect condition. <br>

Thanks again for the advice. I will keep it handy. I didn't know the program existed, but when I read the post, I checked into it and found out.<br>

Thanks<br>

Dan</p>

 

<p>Considering that the 5DMkIII has been recently released, and since Canon is considering continuation, at least temporarily, of the MK II, might this be a good time to consider switching from a crop camera (60D) to a full framer (MKII)? I am referring to the economics of the potential for the MKII's price going down. I have wanted a full framer for some time, but the prices kept me at bay and the MKII might become priced better in the near future.</p>

 

<p>It's all about perceived utility, value, wants and needs. Sounds like a good camera, at least in this case, is more a want than a need. I have found that most photographers, professionals as well as amateurs, are techno hounds who always want the latest and greatest. But let's not forget that photography is mostly about the photographer, not the camera.<br>

Dan</p>

 

<p>I keep reading about the number of shutter actuations (clicks) that cameras can perform during their lifetimes. I've also read where the metadata contains that data, but I have yet to be able to find it. My 60D has been used quite extensively, but I don't have a clue as to how many clicks it should be able to satisfactorily accomplish, plus how to find that number. Nikons and some other cameras offer these numbers, but based on my examination, Canon does not offer this data. Am I correct, or is there a method to this madness?</p>