edward_mcausher

<p>Alright, is it worth spending $1500 more on the 24mm? I shoot with the D300s, I do all kinds of photography, all amateur but obviously still want the best possible photos. I do "portraits" of my daughter, landscapes, wildlife, whatever is around. My next investment into photography is a wide angle lens. I don't mind the fixed focal length as i can imagine and have read about some advantages; but other than that what would I be paying for in the 24mm that I wouldn't get in the 10-24mm? Is it not worth it on the D300s? Thanks in advance everybody!</p>

<p>Wow! Thanks so much everybody!!!! The main purpose for my lens will be landscapes. Although I mostly take pictures of my daughter now, and would love to get some more background in those as well at times. Right now I keep the 50mm f/1.8D AF on my camera at all times, I read its a great lens for portraits. Thanks so much everybody! This is a great site, I look forward to learning a lot from all of you!</p>

<p>I apologize in advance for the silly questions, but I am just starting to delve into the world of photography. My question is about wide angle lenses on the D300s. What is an ideal wide angle lens? I read on kent rockwell that the 14-24mm f/2.8 may be a waste of money on the d300s because the d300s can't hit the ultra wide angles that the lens is made for. This lens seem to be the top of the line wide angle lens and I'd like to say its the lens for me. What are your thoughts?</p>