Jump to content

joka_gzir

Members
  • Posts

    26
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by joka_gzir

  1. <p>doctor "professor K" as per se I still doing reserch and verifyed a lot . Your answer is positive but is smallest portion of reality. Chemistry goes farther. There are more filters prodused by TIFFEN with title "ENHANCING"..became confusing subject to keep orientation... I sent letter with phtous to TIFFEN USA ( try to cnfuse them ?!) will see results ina few days . Thank you !<br>

    cheers</p><div>00XkTt-305871584.thumb.jpg.ad390d5b842515548ce2f933b79dc692.jpg</div>

  2. <p>Hi there !<br>

    Dear friends I received <strong>TIFFEN 82MM ENHANCING LENS FILTER (049383052152)...and get confused.</strong><br>

    <strong>It does have a greenish tone. At the oficial Tiffen site it does in very purple -</strong><br>

    <strong> <a href="http://www.tiffen.com/displayproduct.html?tablename=filters&itemnum=82EF1">http://www.tiffen.com/displayproduct.html?tablename=filters&itemnum=82EF1</a>( purpellish colour ) tone.</strong><br>

    <strong> Can anybody neutralize a mess in my head . And everything is correct with greenish tone of this filter I received ?!? Mine 's looks like this listing- </strong></p>

    <table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">

    <tbody>

    <tr>

    <td valign="top">

     

     

     

     

     

     

    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">

    <tbody>

    <tr>

    <td valign="top">

     

     

    <img id="i_itemImg" src="http://i.ebayimg.com/02/!B7wtQwQCWk~$(KGrHqYOKoYEz!t)k8nIBM1JICiEW!~~0_1.JPG?set_id=8800005007" alt="" width="64" height="64" />

    <a id="itemImg_a" href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=380266570562"></a>

     

    </td>

    <td valign="top">

    <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=380266570562">TIFFEN 77MM GREEN ENHANCING LENS FILTER MINT</a>

    Item number:380266570562

    Price:$49.99

     

    best regards joka Happy Holliday !

    11/25/2010 13:30 Pacific time

    </td>

    </tr>

    </tbody>

    </table>

     

     

     

     

     

     

    </td>

    </tr>

    </tbody>

    </table>

    <p><strong> </strong></p>

  3. <p>hi there ! I just bought 82mm moose's filter for canon 16-35mm II ( by hoya). It came by mail to me. Question poped up..- how actually many glass filter (s) <strong><em>it should have - 2 or just one glass filter part???</em></strong> There are 2 parts rotation is smooth and ok. a) attached to the lenz - must be stable all the time and b) - outside of the filter- which does rotation to calibrate incomming light . Thats ,what I have.<br>

    What I thought before I've get it,---- it should be 2 glass parts one actually warming effect and other polarizer combined 2 together they functioning as one A + polarizer effect. What is treu?<br>

    Best regards John K</p>

  4. <p>Dear friends !<br>

    What exactly preferance of shooting ( when shooting) <em><strong>with UV Haze</strong></em> , I keep it ( like all of us ?!) on the lens 100% of time., <em><strong>with CPL</strong></em> on it - <em><strong> 2-together (when you need CPL) </strong></em> ?? (refraze - Can this 2 to be at the same time ?)<br>

    Or just one alone CPL ? ( without/remooved from lens UV Haze )<br>

    best regards ..</p>

  5. <p>Thank you gentlemen !<br>

    Other subject puped up.. - There are chines on the market ( as third party on sail /cheaper graduated an ND 2,4,8 eBay and local electronic stores) filters made , then original Galen Rowell SinghRay Graduated Neutral Density filters.<br>

    Chines made third party is about $15 .00 and Original $99.00/each + shipping .<br>

    Q : Is there obvious difference in quality and practical performans on field ? If, for example I'll buy chines made one's and see how and where I'm going with that performens , before I hit/buy the real GSR ND ets filters ( or it's not worce it and it's practically the same and prestige only status ?<br>

    best regards</p>

  6. <p>I Use CPL BW from time to time.. on shine day with my 16-35mm F/ 2.8 II + 7D ( sometime I have impresive results )<br>

    A few days ago I begin to read about Singh Ray Galen "massive" industry of zillion other equal and not equal expensive products/filter , should I say... I tryed shut sunset and it's look like protuberants on the sun , coctail made from carrots- nothing ,....-exept fierry/orange blast..in foggy yellow substance<br>

    The confusion came with ND graduated filters ( 3 different graduated ND filters with likelly on the darkest side with 2 3-4-8 ets stops ?! Orange ,blue ,grey, Tabaco colour all graduated.. suggested as - MUST HAVE ..funny I understand .You can also buy a dissent car if you will not buy all of this suggested filter )<br>

    And JUST ND filters without graduation just worming likelly filters. Also 2-3-4-8-9 stops..<br>

    .Where I should moove with all this desirable filters to create close to normal beautifull sunsets I can see here, at this site, -- absolutelly impressive photous... ????<br>

    Thanks a lot I can see a lot of "like me dessized with perfection to shut the best "<br>

    cheers <br>

    </p>

  7. <p><em>thank you sir !</em><br>

    <em>I understood 16mm will remain as 16mm ( not 26mm because it's EOS digital) on 7D without big visible distortions ..And wider view with 10mm will do "slight" difference and magic regardless ...I ment to say a) 16mm.. and b) 10mm ..both creats "different" ways of the same perspective view.. And EF-S 10-22 mm wil performe as 10mm ..and is not under correlation of this 1.6 multiplyeing factor ?</em><br>

    <em> Must have both ? </em></p>

  8. <p>I heard and know this lenz was build for a full frame Canon cameras.. Still want to ask ..- How could be an affection/frastration if I proceed ?<br>

    ( I separatelly received this 2 peases and eventually make some shooting ,well for my non professional eye photos I made looks "normal") <br>

    Now I'm reading /collecting info about " what I should work with"- this Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Lens which is equivalent of the first one (16-35mmets) but on full frame .<br>

    What would be the verdict ? Thak you to all gurus !<br>

    cheers ... joka 8/26/2010 5pm Pacific time</p>

×
×
  • Create New...