aamir_h

<p>I actually have a screen protector, but I was just wondering. I got one because my last camera got scratches just by brushing on my jacket whilst it was strapped round my neck. With this being a huge screen I didn't want anything going wrong.</p>

<p>I've searched all over and haven't really found anything. Any answers the the question in the title?</p>

<p>So I recently purchased an EOS 550D, because I'm in school at the moment I don't have the best of budgets so I had no chance of forking out enough for a 7D.<br>

Now I love rain shots, and I'd like to take it out in the rain, but would it mess up my camera/lens? Because it's not weatherproof.. Is there anything I could get to protect it while it's in the rain?<br>

Thanks!</p>

<p>Why thank you all for your responses.<br>

I did indeed check out some photos taken with the 17-40 on Flickr, and from what I saw, a lot of them were taken on an APS-C body, and were as wide as I need. So in that sense, I don't think there's a problem for me there.</p>

<p>With that being said, would you say the 10-22mm is better than the 17-40mm f/4 L ?</p>

<p>Well thank you everyone for your responses! It's cleared things up for me, I think if I ever do get a FF camera, I will have a APS-C body along side it. It makes sense, and Robin Sibson, thanks that really made things clearer!</p>

<p>So I have a 550D for the moment, and I do indeed plan on owning a Full Frame body in the future, and there are a couple EF-S lenses that have caught my eye, but I don't know whether I should get them or not.<br>

Canon really should look up to Nikon's automatic cropping of their Full Frame cameras to allow the APS-C sized lenses to work on those bodies. That would make life much easier.<br>

By the way, the two lenses I have in mind are the 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM<br>

and the 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM<br>

Suggestions?</p>