stanic

<p>Thanks a lot for all of your suggestions! <br /><br />I did ask Wim for some additional info on his processing methods. Didn't receive a reply yet. If any of you haven't looked at his portfolio, you definitely should. It is full of wonderful examples of artful processing. <br>

I will have to experiement more with dodge and burn. I have only used it for emphasis / de-emphasis in the past. I guess it's time to get a bit more creative with it. <br /><br />Thanks again,<br />~ Goran</p>

<p>Thanks a lot everyone. This clears things up quite a bit. <br>

Many thanks,<br />~ Goran</p>

<p>Hi,<br>

I was wondering if anyone can explain to me how to achieve this type of effect in processing:<br /><a href="../photo/6800221">http://www.photo.net/photo/6800221</a><br>

I see a lot of similar work all over PNet and am very curious how these types of images are produced. I can recognize certain aspects such as vignetting and diffusion but I am having trouble reproducing it in Photoshop. I sense plug-ins may be involved.<br>

Thanks!<br />~ Goran</p>

<p>Ok, that makes sense. After posting this, I was able to find old posts on the subject that cleared things up a bit as well. Thanks very much!<br>

~ Goran</p>

<p>Hello everyone,<br>

I am a new PNet member, and I am noticing a lot of Anonymous Ratings on the photos I put up on the Critique forum. Are these ratings made by PNet members or just random site visitors? I would prefer to get comments along with a ratings, so I am wondering if there is a way to disable anonymous ratings. I feel they completely defeat the purpose. <br>

Thanks!<br />~ Goran</p>