Jump to content

matthew butkus

Members
  • Posts

    60
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by matthew butkus

    @4am

          13
    My first thought was that this was a monochrome shot - until I saw the lights. Like the previous poster said, this shot would be better without them. Regardless, it is a great shot. C'est bon! Ganz gut gemacht!

    Alive

          59

    I use Ansel Adams' criteria for a good photo: I looked at it "for more than a second."

     

    It is striking. I agree with a previous poster about the fingers on the left hand (they disrupt the image a bit), but that isn't enough to detract from the presentation as a whole.

     

    Well done.

    The Musician

          3

    Okay, I needed a catchy title for the critique request, and sleep

    deprivation has yielded poor impulse control. That being said, I'd

    appreciate your feedback on the above photo.

     

    Grazie.

  1. I am quite impressed by the Digital capture, and I've always been a fan of monochrome work. Since you didn't use film, am I correct in assuming that the filed-out negative carrier edge is a Photoshop element?
  2. I like this shot, and had to rush to get it (the sky was like this for

    ten minutes -- I had to run up a hill, get into my apartment, grab my

    equipment, find film, rush outside and compose the shot). Since I

    don't shoot a lot of color, I'd really appreciate

    constructive feedback from those who do. Thanks.

    Ragnarok

          1

    I really like this shot, and I was looking to get some feedback. I

    don't shoot a lot of color, so constructive criticism

    from those of you who do would be especially appreciated. Thanks!

    Infrared Landscape

          2

    I like the composition, but I have some concerns:

    Did you use any filtration when you took this? The reason that I ask is that while the sky is a beautiful black, you are not getting much halation off of the grass (normally for such a clear day with IR film, the grass would be a gleaming white). I couldn't see much halation in the trees, but not knowing what kind they are, they may not reflect much IR light. Are you using a red or opaque filter when you shoot? Both of these will stop light at a frequency low enough that the infrared effect will be very obvious.

    I would have either shot this when the prominent tree on the right had leaves, as they would demonstrate the IR effect a bit better, or reframed it to include more foliage (anything that is sensitive to IR light).

    Please provide a smaller image -- the medium and large images were both over 330K. I'm using a 28.8K modem to connect, so I was able to make popcorn while I waited for your image to download.

    Have you read Laurie White's book (Infrared Photography Handbook)? If not, it's definitely worth picking up and perusing. Or you might consider shooting a roll or two with the proper filtration in a conservatory or an arboreum to see which plants indigenous to your area reflect the most IR light.

    Hope this helps.

×
×
  • Create New...