Jump to content

daniel_rios

Members
  • Posts

    50
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by daniel_rios

  1. I don't think this image is pornographic. I really think the figure of the body provides a nice contrast to the bars of the "cage." However, I do understand what others might say about the power dynamic between a (male) viewer and a female subject in a caged situation. However, because the photographer is a female (N.B. The photographer is rarely separated from her/his image, especially in a self portrait) that has framed herself, she inevitably controls the interpretation of the image. The image is more about aesthetics than gender dynamics. However, without a commentary from the photographer, it remains up to the viewer to interpret the photograph. Personally, I interpreted this image in terms of form rather than politics.
  2. i find the legs of the table distracting, if only because they are too curved. As for the lighting, i think more would probably have helped, especially on the body. However, having taken many self-portraits, i do realize how difficult it is to get a good self-portrait. especially since you basically have to guess as to what you will look like. overall good job.
×
×
  • Create New...