michael_stern
-
Posts
35 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by michael_stern
-
-
I recently got a Billingham 225 that came with one divider that is labeled "B-15 S'Flex," with two lens compartments. I'd like to get more dividers, but I don't know what sizes are available ... or where to look. Any suggestions? Thnx.
-
I'm not comfortable simply pointing and shooting, so I take a reading
by aiming the camera at something close to 18% reflective in the
frame and use the exposure lock (shutter release halfway down). I
suppose that saves me the few fractions of a second I would have used
turning the shutter speed dial on an M6, but it's no big deal. On the
other hand, in two outdoor portrait situations (one of my dog, the
other of a person), being able to use a very wide aperture for
shallow D.O.F. and a shutter speed of 1/500th or 1/1000th has been a
godsend (although at least so far, a very slow process).
-
As I understand it, the Metz 54 is currently the ONLY flash that will
allow you to use the M7's High Speed Synch and Rear Curtain Synch
(and also strobe) features. Yes, it is expensive ... but I managed to
justify it because I needed a good TTL flash for my Canon outfit, so
I also bought the Canon module.
<p>
Also, for what it's worth, maybe I'm just slow but the fact that you
have to manually adjust the aperture and the flash output to use HSS
makes this a feature to use only for still lifes or people that don't
move!
-
Oops, that version was jpeg-blocky. Maybe this one is better...
<p>
<center>
<img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?
photo_id=681730&size=md" width=408 height=591>
</center>
-
At the risk of getting murdered (again) for posting a pet picture, I thought I'd put up this picture of My Darling Clementine because it was something I couldn't do with a pre-M7 RF Leica. It was taken on 400 ASA negative film at 1/1000 sec, F:1.4 with HSS flash. Without the HSS, I could never have had the thin plane of focus, nice backlight, dark-face detail, and eye highlights as well. This would work on a beautiful model as well as my dog!
<center>
<img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=681128&size=md" width=518 height=750>
</center>
-
Nigel made my life happier, too: shipped the day I ordered, called me
(cross country, on his dime) to give me the tracking number, and was
just plain pleasant to deal with. I'll do business with him again.
-
Thanks to all who responded. I feel a lot better, and the pictures I
took today at F:1.9 at .7 meters appear sharp. As Michael Darnton
pointed out, <I>Position of the lens, within reason, when seated has
nothing to do with focus, since that's determined by the thickness of
the adapter, not the placement of the threads in it.</I>
-
I recently got a 28mm screw-mount Voigtlander and the adapter to fit it on an M-mount Leica. When I insert the adapter as instructed, then screw in the lens, the lens tightens with the dots on the D.O.F. scale and the aperture ring just a few degrees <I>beyond 12 o'clock</I>, i.e. not exactly plumb. I'm shooting a test roll to try to see if this apparent misalignment has any effect on focus (although with a 28, it might be moot), but I wonder if anyone else has seen this and, if so, is it going to present a problem with critical focus when I am 2.5 feet away and F:1.9?
-
As I see it, the 35 Summilux and 50 Noctilux are each so different
that the choice cannot be either-or. The unique properties of the
Noctilux aren't only seen in indoors / low light situations. I took
this picture on a bright sunny day at F:1, 1/1000 sec. I suppose I
could have done the vignetting in Photoshop, but the soft foreground
grass wouldn't have happened, even with the 35 Summilux wide open.
<p>
<center>
<img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?
photo_id=630001&size=lg" width=707 height=473>
</center>
-
<I>Can we assume your Passport conclusion is based on your gallop poll
that suggests being saddled with the higher cost is worthwhile? Or,
was your mane point to stirrup some discussion on topic?</I>
<p>
Just feeling my oats (which is better than long in the tooth or down
at the heels)
-
<center>
<img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?
photo_id=628871&size=md" width=517 height=348>
</center>
-
-
-
There is scientific evidence that pets lower peoples' blood
pressure. Clearly that's not true of photos of pets. Nevertheless,
I do apologize for my vague subject line and promise to be more clear
about exactly what I'm posting in the future. Just to veer back to
the topic of photography and photographic equipment here, I have
found that Leica Ms are great for taking pictures of potentially
nervous animals (birds and horses in particular) for the same reason
they're good with people who might otherwise be intimidated by
noisier gear. One thing's for sure with such critters: you learn to
focus fast!
-
Sheesh, how embarrassing. No anamorphic lens required. Here it is
correctly:
<p>
<center>
<img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?
photo_id=626987&size=md" width=513 height=426>
</center>
-
Honestly, last try to post this picture:
<p>
<center>
<img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?
photo_id=626987&size=md" width=332 height=482>
</center>
-
Fourth time's the charm, I hope:
<p>
<center>
<img src=�http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?
photo_id=626987&size=md�
width=513 height=426>
</center>
-
Oops, again. I apologize, but I'm going to try once more to upload
this picture.
<p>
<center>
<img src=?http://www.photo.net/photo/626987?
width=513 height=426>
</center>
-
Sorry about that red X. I guess I don't have this uploading-picture
process correct yet. I'll try again...
<p>
<center>
<img src=?http://www.photo.net/photo/626973?
width=513 height=426>
</center>
-
<I>Please comment about the bird's eye color. I think I see some
redeye. Everytime I use flash with my pets (dog and cat) I get
tremendous redeye. Does your original show redeye? Does the parrot
have a colored pupil or is it black?
<p>
Is there strong backlight coming in from the window or is this
reflected flash?</I>
<p>
Hi, David Smith;
There is no red-eye in the parrot picture (perhaps amber-eye, as that
is what her eye color is around the pupil). I've photographed a lot
of parrots, including a few in dark places with direct flash, and
never had a problem with red-eye. I'm guessing their retinas don't
reflect light the same way our mammal ones do. And there was lots of
back light from the window, which is why I needed flash. As for dog
and cat red-eye (which from my dogs is actually green-eye), if the
ambient lighting is low, those glowing retinas are inevitable. In
fact, that's why I got the Metz 32-Z2 ... because you can bounce the
light and get nice, lovely eyes like these on Allstar's Darling
Clementine:
<p>
<center>
<img src="http://www.photo.net/photo/626973
" width=828 height=735>
</center>
-
Sorry to waste time and space, but need to try posting this again...
<p>
<center>
<img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=626554&size=md"
width=540 height=418>
</center>
-
I just picked up a 32-Z2 flash to try it out on my TTL and shot this picture with a 50mm Summilux at F:1.4 with flash compensation at -1 stop.
<p>
<center>
<img src="http://www.photo.net/photo/626554">
width=540 height=418
</center>
Soft release isn't soft on M7
in Leica and Rangefinders
Posted