maredmo
-
Posts
213 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by maredmo
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
<p>Dear Michael</p>
<p>You should not take my implication that only subscribers would have something useful to contribute as personal, maybe is not your case but, it is something that happens and it is a reality, we like it or not.<br>
This reality maybe is not important for many ones but, it has a grade of importance, because, as far as i understand how the things are going on this site, here is a ranking of photos that is determined by his ratings.<br>
So, from that point of view, it is very sensical.<br>
I would not be saying this if the behaviour of all raters were diferent, and also, all the topics related with also will not exist.<br>
It is the kind of behaviour that is not useful what is making me thinking this, it is not my intention to come here to insult everyone, in the same way that every one who has put this topic before has done.<br>
Your statement is based on supositions, mine is based in facts.<br>
It is a suposition to say that my "anonymous" ratings "could be" coming from subscribers, because it the same way can come from non-subscribers.<br>
I don`t think is a bad idea, sure, can hurt some sensitive people, but, i think that can be a good thing, i `m not saying that i got the truth, i `m just sharing my thoughts, just like you.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading</p>
<p>Mario</p>
<p> </p>
-
<p>mmm ok, now if i assume that they are not using a profile-aware browser...what will be the safest way of to show a pic? uninstalling the adobe RGB profile from my system?</p>
-
<p>AH! that`s great !<br>
Thanks a lot Jeff :)</p>
-
-
<p>here is the pic</p>
-
<p>Hi</p>
<p>It seems that firefox doesn`t handle color profiles very good, here is the same pic in firefox (to the left) and safari (to the right), <br /> this makes me think that to see what should be is a bit more complicated than it looks....</p>
-
<p>Ok, thanks guys</p>
-
<p>Is that possible?, i mean, to rate a photo without seeing it?</p>
-
<p>by example......</p>
-
<p>Hi Mikael<br>
yes, sure it is, but in my very personal opinion, it is something that can be improved, i think that just in the way that it is, the critique system allows trolling, and i bet that`s the reason of why someones did`n t take care of the photo critique forum as i have read on some posts around here....</p>
-
<p>Hello</p>
<p>I was thinking that maybe the photo critique and rating should be allowed only to subscribers, in that way, only people who spent some time on this and really want to participate on the site will do it.<br>
In my personal experience (i `m very new here anyway..) the only comments i had when i put something in the critique forums have been done for subscribers, and have been useful and constructive.<br>
With respect to all the pros around here, i think that the rating system is a good way on to know how you are doing it, and what you need to improve<br>
In that sense, i would prefer just one rating and one comment than a lot of 3/3 from anonymous ones without any comment.....</p>
<p>thanks for reading</p>
<p>M.</p>
<p> </p>
-
<p>Well, i notice that if i export in full size the files on lightroom and then i resize them using preview, i got no loss of color when i post it on PN, weird, but it works..</p>
Perspective
in No Words
Posted