jake_humphrey
-
Posts
2 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by jake_humphrey
-
-
<p>
<p>If I was looking at any of these lenses I would stay away from the Tokina. The chromatic aberration is very bad on all their lenses, it it like night and day in comparison to Sigma or Tamron. As well most Tokina lenses are very very very soft. It makes most pictures look like mud. I have purchases a Tokina 16-50mm and the front element had a huge scratch on the inside of it. So it goes to show that the quality control issues that they have had from the start has not been addresses. I would buy sigma. I have had very good results with all my sigma lenses. And they have created a good reputation over the past few years, and a great warranty that beats Nikon, Canon for most lenses.</p>
</p>
Is the Tokina 16-50 worth the money?
in Nikon
Posted
<p>If I was looking at any of these lenses I would stay away from the Tokina. The chromatic aberration is very bad on all their lenses, it it like night and day in comparison to Sigma or Tamron. As well most Tokina lenses are very very very soft. It makes most pictures look like mud. I have purchases a Tokina 16-50mm and the front element had a huge scratch on the inside of it. So it goes to show that the quality control issues that they have had from the start has not been addresses. I would buy sigma. I have had very good results with all my sigma lenses. And they have created a good reputation over the past few years, and a great warranty that beats Nikon, Canon for most lenses.</p>