Jump to content

pongpeera_thiapairat

Members
  • Posts

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by pongpeera_thiapairat

  1. <p>First of all, thank you for all your reply<br>

    -Michael S. well I do understand pretty well how DoF works, but each lens gives "unequal" of it, it depends on each lens. My experience I meantioned was that the 35-70 and 50'cron give not equal ammount of DoF at the exactly same setting, many post in websites do confirm my experience. And it's not Nikon 35-70/2.8, but it is 35-40/4 Rom converted to Nikon-F. So my question is that will the 80-200 do the same thing with 90/2 as 35-70 did in DoF comparison with 50'cron.</p>

    <p>-Gil P., well should I just get primes; like 90, 135 instead of a single zoom?</p>

    <p>- Robin S. Thank you fo your opinion :-)</p>

    <p>- CD K, I once used the 50/2ZF and, amazingly, it didn't impressed me like what Leicas did, I just don't like its rendition with strong sat. and contrast, but I do confirm your point that it is one of the lens that really exceed Nikon's lens.</p>

    <p>Thank you all, I still need couple of nights to consider the change lol</p>

  2. <p>I know it sounds weird.<br>

    I am now owning 70-200VR and 105/2.5P and considering changing one of them. The 50'cron 1.ver and 35-70/4 really got me to Leica glass. So I will be purchasing the 80-200 to replace the 70-200VR, or the 90'cron(Canada) to replace 105/2.5.And will be using it on D700 -Leitaxed-<br>

    My main type of shooting is life, candid, and travel, so which one would fit me better? I want the rendition of Leica, and its bokeh so much. Will the 80-200 give narrow DoF enough to do portraits and kind a thing? I noticed that the 35-70 gives me much wider DoF at 50mm F4 than 50'cron at the same setting, does the 80-200 behave the same?<br>

    I have no problem using prime lens anyway. And I love the way 35-70 renders so much.</p>

    <p>Thank you so much for your help :-)</p>

  3. <p>hello!</p>

    <p>I'm newbie here :-)</p>

    <p>well I have a question here, I just got 35-70/4 to use but no filter and have been wonderring whether I could use B+W's E60 instead of Leica's or not. Because the filter threat just, you know, decreases into Lens hood's threat. And there seems to be pretty tiny space there. I've read many comments saying the B+W, in cases, are too big for Leicas, and I am suspecting mine too. So it would really save me a lot from buying B+W instead if it could work flawlessly, but if not, then Leica's will be my only choice left out there.</p>

    <p>Sorry for a pretty long post there!<br>

    Btw, I really love this little lens, brillint colour/sharpness/etc. :-)</p>

    <p>Cheers !</p>

×
×
  • Create New...