pongpeera_thiapairat
-
Posts
16 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by pongpeera_thiapairat
-
-
<p><img src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5029/5760577383_fb2c42226d_z.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="427" /><br>
Taken with Ektar100 on M6 + 2/35 'cron v.IV in Singapore last week.</p>
-
<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2067/5745294742_2f1ba85a59_z.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="433" /></p>
<p>Leica M6 + 2/35 'cron + Provia400</p>
-
<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3546/5718346099_db118a1e89_z.jpg" alt="" width="433" height="640" /></p>
<p>m6+35'cron</p>
-
Berg - that's what I think as well as there seems to be no light lost on mine
-
<p>@Andrew I just wonder how could I lose stops adding UV/IR in front of my lens? the ff is 1.0. How stops are lost?</p>
-
<p>it's .68</p>
-
<p>I think I've read somewhere that you can order the specific size from B+W.</p>
<p>hope this help.</p>
-
<p>wow thank you very much : )<br>
sounds like it would perform like my 1st version R one. so I'd rather save up for the 3rd version on go for Biogon, I guess.</p>
<p>Thanks again :-)</p>
-
<p>I am interested in that and now wondering about its performance, like sharpness and resistance to flare.<br>
searched but I could only found the 3rd or 4th version which seems to be real nice.</p>
<p>Thank you in advance</p>
-
<p>First of all, thank you for all your reply<br>
-Michael S. well I do understand pretty well how DoF works, but each lens gives "unequal" of it, it depends on each lens. My experience I meantioned was that the 35-70 and 50'cron give not equal ammount of DoF at the exactly same setting, many post in websites do confirm my experience. And it's not Nikon 35-70/2.8, but it is 35-40/4 Rom converted to Nikon-F. So my question is that will the 80-200 do the same thing with 90/2 as 35-70 did in DoF comparison with 50'cron.</p>
<p>-Gil P., well should I just get primes; like 90, 135 instead of a single zoom?</p>
<p>- Robin S. Thank you fo your opinion :-)</p>
<p>- CD K, I once used the 50/2ZF and, amazingly, it didn't impressed me like what Leicas did, I just don't like its rendition with strong sat. and contrast, but I do confirm your point that it is one of the lens that really exceed Nikon's lens.</p>
<p>Thank you all, I still need couple of nights to consider the change lol</p>
-
<p>I know it sounds weird.<br>
I am now owning 70-200VR and 105/2.5P and considering changing one of them. The 50'cron 1.ver and 35-70/4 really got me to Leica glass. So I will be purchasing the 80-200 to replace the 70-200VR, or the 90'cron(Canada) to replace 105/2.5.And will be using it on D700 -Leitaxed-<br>
My main type of shooting is life, candid, and travel, so which one would fit me better? I want the rendition of Leica, and its bokeh so much. Will the 80-200 give narrow DoF enough to do portraits and kind a thing? I noticed that the 35-70 gives me much wider DoF at 50mm F4 than 50'cron at the same setting, does the 80-200 behave the same?<br>
I have no problem using prime lens anyway. And I love the way 35-70 renders so much.</p>
<p>Thank you so much for your help :-)</p>
-
<p>an R-user which is 20 years old</p>
<p>btw, just about half a world away from Toronto in Thailand here :-)</p>
-
<p>I've just browsed Leica UVa E60 13381 with " Leitz " instead of " Leica " on it, and wonderring if it is fake or not ?</p>
<p>Thank you so much<br>
Pong</p>
-
<p>Thank you for all replies here :-)</p>
<p>so if no problem of too big size of B+W on 35-70, then I would give it a try then</p>
<p>Thank you so much!<br>
Pong</p>
-
<p>hello!</p>
<p>I'm newbie here :-)</p>
<p>well I have a question here, I just got 35-70/4 to use but no filter and have been wonderring whether I could use B+W's E60 instead of Leica's or not. Because the filter threat just, you know, decreases into Lens hood's threat. And there seems to be pretty tiny space there. I've read many comments saying the B+W, in cases, are too big for Leicas, and I am suspecting mine too. So it would really save me a lot from buying B+W instead if it could work flawlessly, but if not, then Leica's will be my only choice left out there.</p>
<p>Sorry for a pretty long post there!<br>
Btw, I really love this little lens, brillint colour/sharpness/etc. :-)</p>
<p>Cheers !</p>
w/nw Pic of the Week # 27
in Leica and Rangefinders
Posted
<p><img src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5039/5891349620_318eb9388d_z.jpg" alt="" width="433" height="640" /><br>
m6 + 1.4/50 ver.I + delta400<br />grainy photo caused by bad scan :-(</p>