fpessolano

The camera is 10 months old, with still more than a year of warranty (in EU).

It comes with quite few extra bits:

 

- Fuji X-t20 with screen protector

- lensmate thumb rest

- generic shutter cap

- Fuji Leather case BLC-XT10

- Trascent 128Gb SD 90Mb/s 600x

- Fuji Hand Grip MHG-XT10

 

Contact me for photos, everything is as new!

 

In great shape, I am selling it because i do not use it much since I have the sigma 160-600.

Price 850 EUR plus shipping is need to be. Shipping is at the buyer risk

<p>A long time since I joined this thread!<br>

A shot from my trusty d700 and the old 70-200 during a dancing show where I served as a photographer.</p>

<p><img src="http://thefoodtraveller.smugmug.com/Everyday-Photography-1/Lenske/Versioning/i-KjPRXbZ/0/L/DSD9741-L.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="600" /></p>

<p>I did some dance event last week .... the d700 with the 70-200 made a huge difference. And do not be afraid of using iso3200 and iso4000. Results are still good (after some Topaz Dfine 5) and better than nothing (and way better then what you would get otherwise).</p>

<p>I am back to this thread after a very long absence!!! Here vis a shot I took at the Tokyo Fish Market .... illustrating tourists during the tuna auction!<br>

<img src="http://thefoodtraveller.smugmug.com/Everyday-Photography-1/Personal-Assignments/TFT-fotolog/DSD6203/1107143622_6RwAy-L.jpg" alt="" /><br>

D700 with AFS50G</p>

Same problem here .... What is going on?

<p>Since difference in Optical quality is there but almost not visible even to trained eyes, choose basing yourself on the only real tangible differences:<br>

Zeiss takes fiters and is smaller, but it is manual focus.<br>

Nikon can go more and less wide, but it takes no filters.<br>

The rest is more or less equal.<br>

I opted for the Nikon in the end because I also took the 24/1.4, but that does not need to apply to you.</p>

<p>It has been a long time since my last post here ... here is a shot of an old shop in the village of Ostuni in Apulia (Italy) that we visited last week.</p>

<p><img src="http://thefoodtraveller.smugmug.com/Everyday-Photography-1/Personal-Assignments/TFT-fotolog/DSD41934567tonemapped/948230093_8q3Tq-L.jpg" alt="" width="398" height="600" /><br>

D700, 24G, f/2.2, HDR</p>

<p>When I saw them preparing the new bells for church tower, I could not resist!<br>

<img src="http://photography.siteaside.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/906400390_7ANQh-XL.jpg" alt="" width="508" height="768" /></p>

<p>A shot on my flight from Brussels to Chicago last week!<br>

<img src="http://thefoodtraveller.smugmug.com/Everyday-Photography-1/Personal-Assignments/TFT-fotolog/DSC3440/896559812_8injf-L.jpg" alt="" /><br>

<em>D700 , 24G, f/1.8, 1/250s, iso2500</em></p>

<p>Since I got finally a copy of the new 24, all I am doing is using it at 1.4 to get it to fail to focus. My latest try involved some help for misfocusing (but it did focus well again).<br>

<br /> <img src="http://thefoodtraveller.smugmug.com/Everyday-Photography-1/Personal-Assignments/TFT-fotolog/DSC3242/886489631_ViEVM-L.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="600" /><br /> <em>D700, AFS24, f/1.4</em></p>

<p>I have managed to use only (as in 99%) the 50 for 6 months. It helps a lot in developing a vision.<br>

In fact, I do the same with all lenses to put them on and force myself to use them in order to know the lens better.</p>

<p>I am going to join the theme of kids. I saw this yesterday when I picked my son (first in the row) and somebody entered the daycare. <br>

<img src="http://photography.siteaside.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/871403967_CE9fq-XL.jpg" alt="" width="512" height="768" /></p>

<p><a href="/photodb/user?user_id=5820185">Joshua Boelter</a> - That is a nice one!</p>

<p>My shot is from a session last saturday in Charleroi, a Belgian city full of industries (some abandoned). <br>

D700, 24-70, HDR of 5 exposures.<br>

<img src="http://thefoodtraveller.smugmug.com/photos/863594093_uoEdc-L-1.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="600" /></p>

<p>It was a rather poor in these last two week for me and photography. Raining, raining and raining.<br /> There was just a bit of dry (but humid) time saturday morning for visiting a local amusement park for kids.</p>

<p><img src="http://thefoodtraveller.smugmug.com/Other/TFT-fotolog/DSC1202/854453477_eV2hu-L.jpg" alt="" /><br /> <em>D700, 24-70@24</em></p>

<p>Lex - I think I am moving to critique only. I honestly do not mind low rating but with an explanation. Otherwise what is the point.<br>

I myself now tend to leave comments and often not even rate. I actually like Bob´s suggestion of only like, dislike, indifferent.</p>

<p>I would be happy with just adding an third option as if rating with comment only. It is now so normal that anything people posts gets a 3-3 or a 4-4 as one of the first 3 rates. Honestly, this automatic low rating on every photo just posted is forcing me to think to either do critique only or simply call PN a failed trial.<br>

I also hate people rating low photos that are misplaced. Just leave a comment and say so! Sometimes is a mistake, sometimes there is no category that fits, etc. If you want to help and give 3 to a great photo just because it is in the wrong category, well ... you are part of the problem.</p>

<p>Radu - thanks. This was the first time I used a 24mm in such a setting ... since normally my family, who picks the spots, went not for corners!<br /> <br /> Peter - Thanks. This is not an HDR ... the trick here is rather simple ... I used a polarizer!<br>

Emilie - Thanks</p>

<p>Nice shots so far.<br>

Here is mine taken during the Paris-Roubaix bicycle race last sunday with 24-70@24 + polarizer.<br>

<img src="http://thefoodtraveller.smugmug.com/photos/836501379_VR4aL-L.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="533" /></p>

<p>A 120-300/2.8VR FX would be great. I would dump my 70-200 in a second for it.<br>

Maybe a new fisheye FX.<br>

Apart from that ... since the 24 is now out, there is nothing more missing.<br>

And only 24 and 400 missing from my collection (well, 400 will be missing forever I guess).</p>

<p>A photo of the Sassi of Matera in Italy (where movies on Jesus gets shots ...).<br>

<img src="http://thefoodtraveller.smugmug.com/Portfolio/Traveling-Photography/LNM0184b/819746129_Sysao-L-1.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="534" /></p>

<p>I honestly do not miss filters on the 14-24. It is too wide for a polarizer, I passed the worry of scratching it, and I do not use ND filters but braketing instead. It is a special lens, but simply stunning. What I would really need to see is that the 24 is already excellent in rendering at wide apertures (1.4-3.5) so to be very useful in low light. Performance stopped down will probably not be better than the 14-24.<br>

If this lens compares to the zoom like the 50/1.4 compares to the 50/1.8 .... not interested at this price level.</p>

<p>Bjorn<br>

Looking forward to read your comments on the 24 ... especially for who already owns the 14-24 like me. I am still debating on taking this lens or start my 2-3 years saving plan for a 400VR instead.</p>

<p>A snapshot of my son watching cars through the gate ... something he loves to do to my amazed. But everybody says it is normal ....<br>

Taken with a D700 and AFS50/1.4<br>

<img src="http://thefoodtraveller.smugmug.com/Family-Albums/Matteo/Matteo-Pessolano/DSC0128/814675460_43DuZ-L.jpg" alt="" /></p>