bobby_rembert

<p>I Had this Problem after just recently purchasing 4 16gb sandisk ultra class 6. I get camera freezing and card errors after shooting between 10 and 30 shots. I Googled and found that as of Nov 10th a "B" firmware 1.03 Has been released. <a href="http://support.nikonusa.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/17542">http://support.nikonusa.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/17542</a> Here is what it addresses<br /> <strong>Modifications enabled with B firmware Ver. 1.03</strong></p>

<ul>

<li>An error where the card may not have been recognized when some memory cards were used has been addressed.</li>

<li>The following issues occurred when the mode dial was rotated from U1 or U2 to another shooting mode or from another shooting mode to U1 or U2 when the power was off or when the exposure meters are off (Auto meter-off). These issues were resolved.</li>

<li>

<ul>

<li>A new folder is sometimes created despite the fact that the current folder does not yet contain 999 files and none of the files are numbered “9999”.</li>

<li>The number of remaining exposures may not be displayed as specified in the settings.</li>

<li>The setting for <strong>Role played by card in Slot 2</strong> may change between <strong>Overflow, Backup,</strong> and <strong>RAW Slot 1- JPEG Slot 2</strong>.</li>

</ul>

</li>

<li>An issue where <strong>Battery info</strong> in the setup menu sometimes showed sufficient remaining charge even when the remaining charge for the AA batteries inserted in the MB-D11 battery pack was low has been resolved.</li>

<li>An issue where a saved photo may not have been displayed properly when a movie was displayed in playback mode while saving the photo has been resolved.</li>

<li>An issue where zoom in or zoom out may not have performed properly when the playback zoom in or playback zoom out button was pressed while in Live view has been resolved.</li>

<li>The message displayed when the internal memory of the Wireless Transmitter WT-4 is formatted from the Format transmitter's memory under Device settings in Wireless transmitter of the camera’s setup menu was changed from Done to Built-in memory formatted.</li>

<li>The message displayed when the internal memory of the Wireless Transmitter WT-4 is formatted from the <strong>Format transmitter's memory</strong> under <strong>Device settings</strong> in <strong>Wireless transmitter</strong> of the camera’s setup menu was changed from <strong>Done</strong> to <strong>Built-in memory formatted</strong>.</li>

</ul>

<p>Just Downloaded it. Will giving an update with my findings</p>

<p>Thanks Rob. This really clears things up.</p>

<p>Thanks Mendel. that is why i made it clear i was uploading raw images. This question is geared towards people that use bridge. Once anyone were to read the post they would understand just as You did what I was asking, with out the intimidating subject heading.<br /> But thanks for your time</p>

<p>I thought it was just me. But now I am starting to see that every time i upload pics (Raw images) via bridge, they look fine when rendering for the preview. Then right when they get to 100% resolution bridge will ad a red tint/temp to every picture. Its time consuming having to go into camera raw and take the red out of every photo. how do i fix this. I did see a calibration tab in raw. but i only see d2X modes modes to choose from what do i pick for a d90</p>

<p>Oh, i must have gotten d60 from another poster lol just got them mixed up</p>

<p>spit toning with out converting to greyscale. I think that would acomplish this effect</p>

<p>When all the subjects faces are different distances from the camera even small amounts, you want to use as high an f stop/small aperture as possible. This will ensure you have some depth of field to play with.<br>

In the pic you are talking about i can see that the background is pretty sharp overall. wide angle or small f stop could be responsible for that. don't forget that the d60 is 10.2 megapixel so all those heads in one photo are pretty small they don't contain as many pixels as say a pic of one person where the face is filling the frame and using a lot of pixels.<br>

The only way you can get the faces to be more sharp is to buy a full frame (20+ megapixel) or medium format (40+ megapixel) camera. being there is no reason for anyone to see the pic at that magnification that would be a waste of money. the lack of sharpness in a pic with this many people is perfectly normal in that sense.</p>

<p>I use photoshop, lightroom sometimes. bridge its self even has a gallery setup</p>

<p>thanks for your imput fellas. will check these out.</p>

<p>I am trying to create a website to advertise my photography. I am going for that popular flash look that alot of photogs have been using. Its simple and the pics are readily available for the possible client to view. I am using dreamweaver and have created my four main pages. are these flash galleries built from the ground up or can u download these layouts some how? examples: <a href="http://www.davidejackson.com/">www.davidejackson.com</a> <a href="http://davejacksonphotography.com/">www.davejacksonphotography.com</a> <a href="http://www.judithannphotography.com/index2.php">www.judithannphotography.com</a> . can i do this my self or is it better to have a designer do it for me?</p>

<p>Oh thanks for pointing out the size diff. I was so drawn to the prices, i didnt even look. bigger is better</p>

<p>found a beauty dish that fits the paul c buff flash units its about half the price as the one listed on the paul c buff web site at $69.97. <a href="http://alienbees.com/22r.html">http://www.alienbees.com/22r.html </a> ahd here is the <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/Beauty-Dish-41cm-Honeycomb-Soft-Alien-Bee-Alien-Bees_W0QQitemZ200370523371QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item2ea7038ceb&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14">Ebay unit</a> .<br>

I dont have hands on experience with either of them. So the basic question is should i go for the deal or stick with the name i know? If any one has purchased the ebay unit how do you like it (quality)?</p>