jitendra_katre

<p>Thanks <a href="/photodb/user?user_id=5331729">David Stephens</a> for very valuable info...</p>

<p>thanks <a href="/photodb/user?user_id=5331729">David Stephens</a> and <a href="/photodb/user?user_id=3916154">Mark Keefer</a>.. I liked your landscapes too.</p>

<p>thanks friends....<a href="/photodb/user?user_id=857315">Tudor ApMadoc</a>, lovely landscapes...</p>

<p>Sarah Fox, I went through your article and it is really enlightening, Thanks.</p>

<p>thank you very much for valuable suggestions, friends. I really appreciate your help.</p>

<p>hi everybody,<br>

I have Canon 7d and I use it for wildlife photography with 300mm,f/2.8, Now I wish to try my hand in 'Landscapes'. Do I go for lens like C 10-22 and use it with 7d or it is essential to go for a full-frame camera and lens like 17-40? The most amazing landscapes I have seen are done with full-frame camera. Thanks !</p>

<p>thanks friends, it looks like i will have to go for a zoom lens....</p>

<p>thank you all for this useful info.......</p>

<p>hello friends,<br>

I have Canon 7d and Canon 300,2.8, Tamron 90mm, and Tokina 12-24 with 1.4 and 2 x converters. which of these lenses are useful in masai mara? do I need to add any more lens? thanks...</p>

<p>now that you point it out, i see the difference in framing...thanks Mark.</p>

<p>hello friends,<br>

here is a comparison between images (both uncropped and unedited, only resized,) from these two cameras. both were shot from same distance mounted on tripod in AV mode with TAMRON 90MM macro at f/5.6, iso-200, evaluative metering , in landscape picture style and auto white balance. there is obvious difference in metering , 7d at 6 seconds while 450d at 13 seconds.what surprised me more was the magnification these two similar sensors gave. why this difference ? does anybody know? thanks.</p><div></div>

<p>thanks all, ...John, i saw the link and thanks for it, very informative...</p>

<p>thanks everybody for very informative response...</p>

<p>thanks Alan..</p>

<p>hello,<br>

how do you compare canon 300mm f/2.8 +canon 2x t.c. vs canon 500mm f/4 ? i know everybody will say 500mm is always better, but there are many plus points in 300mm. it is lighter, less conspicuous, more versatile,and much cheaper... and image quality with 2x t.c. suffers only in contrast and not in resolution..any opinions?<br>

thanks in anticipation....</p>

<p>thanks everybody for really useful feedback....</p>

<p>how often do you use tripod for bird photography?</p>

<p>thank you all very much for valuable suggestions.....</p>

<p>i have seen many test chart studies and reviews of these two lenses... does anybody have real life experience with these lenses?</p>

<p>thanks everybody...</p>

<p>i use canon 400mm for bird photography. how often one needs lens with shorter focal length than this for wildlife (not only birds)? do i have to invest in such lens?</p>

<p>thanks everybody for very useful feedback...</p>

<p>currently i use canon 400mm,5.6 and manfrotto 680B monopod ...and i find the use of monopod satisfactory. is it possible to get similar results if i add kenko pro 1.4 300 to this combination? or use of tripod is essential?</p>

<p>thanks everybody for valuable suggestions...</p>

<p>i use canon 550d and own canon 400mm,f/5.6.now i want something with shorter focal length. i am thinking about 70-200,f/4(non is) and 70-300 is(non L lens). kindly advise..</p>