tri_tran7

<p>Haha,the reason for me having a D300s? It was a gift.<br>

Otherwise,I'd still be shooting with my D200,hahah.</p>

<p>Thanks for the input Richard,I'll most likely be using my sb-600 with an omni bounce.</p>

<p>I do know all the requirements to jumping over onto full frame such as having non-dx lenses so I won't be getting the cropped view and such.<br /> Also,what I mean by "149K left on the shutter " is basically what Shun said.<br /> And that got me thinking,the d700 has been out for quite a while now and that its going under a face lift soon.<br /> I am starting to do a lot of weddings so its only practical that I'd be considering the jump to full frame because of the noise control, but I also do have a flash. The next wedding I have to shoot is soon and I'm getting nervous, (Reception starts at 7 at night,yikes!)<br /> Even though it is extremely temping to do the switch,I might just sit it out till a refresh of the D700,even though I really don't like being the person with "latest!" gear. : /</p>

<p>I'm trying to move to FX for the bump in ISO since I'm starting to shoot more indoor events and such. </p>

 

<p>I'm trying to make the big jump from DX to FX by selling my Nikon D300s.<br>

I just got an offer from a sports photographer who is shooting with a D700 to trade me.<br>

So,my question to you guys is how much would a slightly used D300s with 149K left on the shutter compare in value to a D700 with 120k left on the shutter?</p>

<p>I understand either way I'm going to be throwing some money in,its just I would like to see how much.</p>

<p>I'm having the same problem with my Capture nx 2 not reading my nef files.</p>

<p>I installed the nef codecs,transfer and I'm running on capture nx 2 v2.2.<br>

When they are imported to a folder I can see the thumbnails of the nef files but when I try to open them in NX 2 it gives me the warning and says it cannot load the file.</p>

<p>I'm running on vista 32 bit and any help is appreciated,thanks!</p>

<p>I was set on Focus priority for continuous servo - AF, I just tried release and release + focus and it did the trick.<br>

And thank you very much for the answeres,helped a lot! : )<br>

As fr the lenses,how are tokina's in term of build and quality?<br>

I've held the Sigma 10-20mm and its built like a tank.</p>

<p>So far loving my D300s,the shutter noise is so rewarding.</p>

<p>So,I recently got my Nikon D300s (Today actually).</p>

<p>And I must say I'm extremely pleased/impressed with it, coming from canon's side everything was backwards for me and took some adjusting...Especially the light meter.</p>

<p>Anywho,I just had a quick question. <br>

In continuous servo- AF I can't help but feel that when I have it on 7 FPS shooting it goes a bit sluggish,is it because of the constant focusing that bogs it down? And if so,is there anyway to boost it back up?</p>

<p>Also,I've been looking at a wide angle for my Nikon and saw the Sigma 10-20mm. Was wondering if anyone owns one and how it performs, I've seen a lot of test shots and I enjoy it,but I still would enjoy anyones feedback on it. Or even recommendation for other wide angles.</p>

<p>...I'm loving October so far,new camera and I turn 21 soon.</p>

<p>Cheers.</p>

<p>Joe A, My overall budget for my new camera is roughly around 3,500.</p>

<p>The nikkors I plan on getting with my d700 are the 50mm 1.4 and the 18-35mm f3.5/4.5.<br>

Since I tend to do more portraits/action/show photography I figure those two would be a good start before I drop a more money into higher end nikkors.</p>

<p>But also,I might start on macro photography soon as well.</p>

<p>Lol,and Gary. I already made up my mind in a previous post. But thanks for your input.</p>

<p>Ah thank you so much for the responses everyone! : D</p>

<p>And I got a chance to play with my friends d200 and i did find that it was hunting quite a bit on flat surfaces and what not. The noise reduction wasn't as great as the d300/d700 which is my major reason to buying a d700 for the low noise at higher iso's. (I shoot a lot of concert/show pictures)</p>

<p>Of course,MP isn't a huge factor for me since I'm not printing posters and the 8 FPS is a nice addition since I enjoy shooting sport photography.</p>

<p>Now the wait begins...by my calculations I'll have a d700 by october. : ) <br>

Its going to be worth the wait!</p>

<p>Thanks a lot for the response everyone.<br>

I was looking at it quite extensively and I think I might go with Nikon due to the fact that the 51 af system caught my attention since I do a variety of shooting.</p>

<p>And as for lenses I'm going for more wide angle/regular zoom,</p>

<p>On top of that another curve ball was thrown my way,a friend of mine just offered to sell me his d200 for roughly around 500 or so.<br>

And being the first time I've shot a Nikon in forever,should I take the bait and go with the d200 as an introduction into the d700? Or just dive head first into the d700?</p>

<p>I have tested both the 5d MK II and d700,holding it and such, I'm not going to lie, I enjoy the Nikon feel better...Feels like I could knock someone unconscious with it and still take pictures afterwards. : )</p>

<p>Hey guys. So here's the break down. : )</p>

<p>I've been shooting with canon for 4 years now,and i feel its time to make the jump to full frame or the jump across the line to nikon.<br>

Heres the catch,with my 30d I've already sold most of my lenses to a few of my friends who use them more than I do.<br>

So with that in mind its a level playing field for canon or nikon.</p>

<p>I've been doing research on both and I can't find any complaints between the two besides the fact that Nikon's lenses are a little more pricey and canon has ones that are cheap yet perform extremely well.<br>

But the one thing that turned me onto nikon was the 51 point focusing system as well as its performance in low light with higher isos (wow!).</p>

<p>So im on the fence to get either or. I just need some help.</p>

<p>If possible for people who own the bodies to give me their feedback on it and some test shots? : ) Be much appreciated</p>

<p>Perfect,just the push i needed. <br>

Was on the fence about this but now im not anymore! Thank you guys!</p>

<p>Thanks for the reply!<br>

And I was going to say,a 50/60 dollar price difference makes the world of a difference to me knowing that I'm going to get it new and all the wear and tear put on it is done by me.</p>

<p>But does anyone know how the print quality is on matte/semi glossy?<br>

I saw a video on the glossy prints,it looks stunning,but I tend to lean more on the matte side of printing.</p>

<p>So first of all,I'm fairly new to the digital printers and whats good and bad ,etc.</p>

<p>But I've been scanning forums and such for printers and comparing them</p>

<p>From what I hear epson's are usually the way to go.</p>

<p>So I have this...</p>

<p>I have a deal on craigslist with a guy who is selling an Epson r1800 for around 300 dollars.<br>

With extra ink sets and paper.<br>

But that being said he has had the printer for a year and half and has only used it for a class.<br>

That being said he will only meet out in public which eliminates the chance for me to test it out and such.</p>

<p>On the other hand I could get my hands on a R1900 for roughly around 350 new.<br>

And obviously being the bigger brother to the r1800 I read that the r1900 has some fixed issues and tweaks etc.</p>

<p>So my question to you guys as a beginner in the digital dark room is the comparison and personal preference between the two.</p>

<p>And which one you would recommend to a beginner/amateur at printing (but not at photography in general). Baha.<br>

I admit I don't know anything about printers, but I am savvy in photoshop and what not. So I'm not a complete noob. :)</p>

<p>Thanks in advance.</p>

<p>-Tri</p>