Jump to content

anton_kudris

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by anton_kudris

  1. <p>Don't listen to Ken Rockwell. Sigma 30 1.4 is a very good lens. The only real problem with sigma - is build quality. Sigma is well known to differentiate build quality from sample to sample, so it's highly advisable to choose best sample among several lens samples right in the store. <br>

    Nikkor 35 f/2 is also nice, but to my taste it's not fast enough for lowlight photography </p>

  2. <p>don't forget to consider recently announced Sony Alfa A850 :) It's also full frame<br>

    one friend of mine made this calculation recently:<br>

    SONY/Minolta<br>

    SAL-70200G Zoom AF 70-200mm f/2.8 APO G(D) SSM - 1800<br />SAL-2470Z 24-70mm f/2.8 Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* - 1600<br />SAL-1635Z 16-35mm f/2.8 ZA SSM Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* - 1900<br />--------------<br />5300$</p>

    <p>NIKON<br>

    Zoom Telephoto AF VR Zoom Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8 G-AFS ED-IF - 1870<br />Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF-S Zoom Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED - 1800<br />AF-S Zoom Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED AF Lens - 1830<br />--------------<br />5500$</p>

    <p>Canon<br>

    Canon Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM - 1350<br />Canon Zoom Super Wide Angle EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM - 1550<br />Canon Zoom Telephoto EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM - 1900<br />--------------<br />4800$</p>

  3. <p>Personally I would skip Zeiss 35mm f/2 (i really did) for huge amounts of purple fringing wide open... this really kills picture. It's NOT sharp wide open, altought after f/4 sharpness is nice. Bokeh is rather rude, but on 35mm who really cares? What is really outstanding about this lens is build quality. But for the price of Zeiss I found old Nikkor 35mm f/1.4 to be a better competitor. <br>

    I think the only lens that fits the 'legendary' tag in this range is newly Nikkor 12-24 f/2.8<br /><br />and real legend is 'The cream machine' Nikkor 85mm f/1.4 :)</p>

×
×
  • Create New...