j_guiles

<p>Flowers are always fun. I sometimes move tables/objects to get the lighting to my liking<br>

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/14882256-lg.jpg" alt="" width="466" height="700" /></p>

 

<p>Thanks for the responses!<br>

@Charles - placed locations in the 'services' page<br>

@Matt - i'm looking into the page difference, I know if the server does not play flash, the html site does have a very different look. I also switched the gallery pages to a different transition and just kept the old film for the main page. Disabling of the right-click is not a function I can control, it is how my service provider automatically sets up the page(may have to inquire with them if it is possible). I will add in the meta-tags, thanks for pointing that out. I've checked it on an iPad and it works, just switches to the html site.<br>

Thanks again.</p>

<p>Hey Everyone,</p>

<p>Looking to get some feedback and responses on my website. Have done my research on the forums here and tried to applied most of that knowledge to the site.</p>

<p>It is flash, but automatically transfers to html for use with Ipads, mobile devices, etc.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.jguiles.com"> www.JGuiles.com </a></p>

<p>Thanks</p>

<p>Thanks for all the help, much appreciated</p>

<p>I have Lightroom 3 and Photoshop CS5 and need to add a signature to my photos for online use (facebook, etc). I would like to do the strip that goes across the page and has my company name within the strip.<br>

Example photo -<br>

http://www.rawphotodesign.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/rooftop-engagement-session-06.jpg</p>

<p>What is the best way to go about creating this?<br>

Thanks</p>

<p>I have Lightroom 3 and need to add a signature to my photos for online use (facebook, etc). I would like to do the strip that goes across the page and has my company name within the strip. Example photo - <b>Image removed. Per the photo.net Terms of Use, do not post photos that you did not take.</b></p>

<p>How do I go about doing this?</p>

<p>Awesome shot, love it<br>

At the end of the day the only thing that matters is if the client is happy and I would assume they are<br>

No need for old fashioned, this is only 1 pic of probably many from the shoot and very creative, it's 2010 not 1955</p>

<p>I have used the 80-200mm that you speak of (my father has had it for years) and it has a reputation with auto focusing issues, primarily back focusing. Do a search in this Nikon section, as recently it has come up a few times. </p>

<p>I use the Dot Line RSRT06N10 with my D700 and have had good results. I've tested it to about 60 feet away and it works fine. I always take 2 pics when I use it as sometimes the first one does not autofocus (just takes the pic at the exact settings). Just bring the remote with you and press the button, easy as can be.</p>

<p>Great info John, thanks. Luckily I have a D700 as my main camera, but also a D60 backup at the moment, which gives me the crop factor (and 2.8) if I feel I am still too short. It also seems the 400mm is over twice the weight of the 300mm, and that is a huge factor in between those as well. And if the 80-400 had a larger aperture and faster AF i'd be all over it.</p>

<p>Is there any graph or chart that would show (hopefully specific to this lens) the positive effect of VR at given shutter speeds? Using a monopod, at what speed with the VR have no advantage, approximately?</p>

<p>Thanks for the advice. I'm going to look at a used one this week (non-vr) so will take it out and see how its performs hand-held for myself. A local shop also has a vr version for sale, so will test that out after and see if i really need it.</p>

<p>The 400mm has been my other debate, but it seems they are a bit more rare and harder to find used.</p>

<p>That's what I was thinking. I have the 70-200 2.8 VR as well as the 85 1.4 also (my 70-300 just didn't cut it in these situations and the 70-200 was still short). The TC's are next on the list - 1.4 and 2.0. </p>

<p>I'm looking into purchasing a 300mm 2.8 AF-S lens and I am caught between getting the VR or not. The use of the lens in particular will be night baseball and football games as well as indoor MMA/fight press conferences/weigh-ins. Seeing the 300mm is a longer lens (and heavier) faster shutter speeds will be needed in most of the cases that I will be shooting in anyways, and I want to know if the $1500-$2000 more for the VR is going to be worth it. Most shoots will be with a monopod when the situation is available. Thanks.</p>

<p>Have a D700 with 17-35, 50, 35-70 and 80-200 with Photoshop CS4<br>

So for the 1st image, using the 17-35 and getting close would help with the bokeh and depth look? Going to practice some tomorrow but would like to know which pieces of equipment would work best</p>

<p>Thanks</p>

 

<p>http://i31.tinypic.com/206ekav.jpg<br>

http://i28.tinypic.com/2vb5vt1.jpg</p>

<p>I am looking to get more of a 3D effect on my portraits. How do I go about getting this effect (above links) with my photos? Is it a filter blur? How hard is it to accomplish?</p>

<p>Thanks</p>

 

<p>Cool, thanks for the info. My equipment - D700, 17-35 2.8, 50 1.4G, 35-70 2.8 and 80-200 2.8<br>

Any settings within the camera that I should play with for these specific kind of shots?</p>

<p>I am starting to shoot some cars for my portfolio. I have seen some shots from different sites and would like to be able to closely replicate these kinds of images. I believe a lot has to do with HDR, but what process and software is needed to create images like these:<br>

http://www.flickr.com/photos/30361697@N03/3437755706/<br>

http://www.flickr.com/photos/30361697@N03/3446070602/<br>

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-corvette-general-discussion/2359948-d2forged-wheels-group-buy-details-inside.html<br>

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/1570806888-post1.html</p>

<p>Thanks</p>