Jump to content

john_forney

Members
  • Posts

    85
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by john_forney

  1. Disclaimer, my "a" key is missing from my keyboard. Oh, so is my "q" key. my kids plucked them off.

     

    -The itch.

     

    If I recall my "itch" for MF gear, I took a similar approach you took. I asked questions. Looked at all the +/-. In the end, for me MF was/is a point along the path, not destination. 35, MF, LF, ULF all have their strengths. Until you know yours, you should try different options. That is, until you know how you see and work and what ultimately satisfies you, MF is just another tool along the way.

     

    Each tool's +/- has been somewhat addressed in some way whether it is corrective movements, AF, etc. The bottomline is finding out what pleases your way of seeing the world. The compromises in each format are unique to the format. i.e. 4x5 is "slower" , but look at David Burnett's work. He mastered photojournalistic work with a 4x5...or maybe he was a master already and just decided for giggles to use the 4x5/ ektar combo. Either way, he mastered it.

     

    Whatever. There are many diversions along the way. Its part of the process. Keep experimenting and find what you like, then stick with it and master it.

  2. yes, i have seen the plungercam. i would love to use my hassy 503, which unlike Mark Tuckers hassy, does not have a focal plane shutter. If i could figure out a good work around I'd do it since i'd prefer to shoot from the hip and forgo the tripod. maybe i'll go find the cheapest 80mm lens with a shutter and mount it on a plunger/bellows. got > two weeks before i head to belize with whatever contraption i can put together.
  3. Thanks for the responses. I have the Primitive Photography book due to arrive some time this week. I am looking to get some very soft focused images with glowing highlights, I thought might only be possible with old lenses. Even a little of a holga meets tilt/shift combo. I have an aero ektar and i recently got a darlot paris. both of these are awesome in their own right, but i'm looking to get even more distortion. see susanburnstine.com for example...from what i know, most of her stuff is from homemade cameras/lenses.

     

    thanks!

  4. I just ordered a pb-6 bellows off ebay. It fits fine with my fm2,

    but I need an accessory for my fuji s2 because the battery pack gets

    in the way. Do I need the pk-11? or the pb-6d?

     

    Anybody know where I can find a good deal on either? Seems going

    prices are around $50 for the pk-ll.

     

    Thank you!

  5. I recently purchased a Tenba Medium photo backpack for 20% off. i

    had not done a lot of research on bags. i know there are a million

    choices. i'm looking for some feedback given my useage...

     

    I'm doing on-location portraiture. In addition to camera gear, i

    have backdrops to carry as well. I was looking for a bag that could

    carry a fuji s2 with 85mm attached, pocket wizards, external meter,

    and a enormous Quantum Qflash and battery(with 400 w/s module). I

    think the backpack will work, but i'm not sure if others have found

    any serious limitations with backpacks...items are inaccessible when

    on your back ( or if others have recommendable solutions for this

    setup)? I'm wondering if there are any others out there with

    similar useage and what baggage they use. The battery is the

    biggest obstacle. I had originally planned on a shoulder bag, but

    the battery for the flash was just too bulky. For work when flash

    is not necessary, i plan on using my lowe fanny pack.

     

    any advise is appreciated, thanks!

  6. Now that I've had a chance to further discuss the Posi process with the head of the lab, and I've received a 16x20 of a cropped 35mm neg, I've got a better idea what's up.

     

    Yes, Scott is right, the real trade-off is smaller file sizes...at 25 megs and much cheaper prices compared to LightJet, atleast locally in Denver.

     

    The 16x20 was a misprint because I ordered 2 8x10's. But I asked the lab tech to let me take it home overnight so I could get a chance to view it for a while. This 16x20 was from a scanned b/w neg at 2400 dpi. I cropped the digital image and the cropped image was maybe 75% of the original scanned size 36x24. The final image size was 8x10 at 25 megs, I dont remember the dpi, but far less than 2400(like 280 or something...I dont have the file with me right now).

     

    The enlargement is on a Konica glossy paper. There is a noticeable "grain" when viewed from upclose. But from a few feet away, it is great. I won't hesitate to head back and use this digital lab again. Just my $.02

  7. I dont have a definitive answer. But I've talked to others this week that are becoming convinced that Posi(sp?) technology out of Italy is rendering much of this file size issue as mute. This technology, of which I cant find any info on this site, uses RGB lasers with conventional light sensitive paper to render an image. And all they require is a 25 meg file cropped to enlargement size. In addition, the company "re-wrote" an algorithm and handles ripping in a new way. The pictures I've seen blew the LightJet images away. I'll find out for sure when I get some prints back from the lab on Tuesday. And get this $5 for an 8x10, $10 for a 11x14, $20 for a 16x20 and $40 for a 20x30. Has anyone else heard of this "sounds to good to be true" technology?
  8. I'm looking to purchase my first MF system. I work at a studio that

    uses Hasselblad so I'm familiar with their system. I've been looking

    at the differences in the Hasselblad and Rollei systems. It appears

    you get so much more from Rollei for a given price than with

    Hasselblad. The biggest drawback seems to be very limited rental

    options and lack of retail support and, apparently, sketchy customer

    service.

     

    Long story short, I'm in Denver working at a studio, but seriously

    considering moving to Minneapolis with the hope of utilizing a

    greater network of mine to pursue more photography work. This camera

    would be for professional use, mostly portraits initially, then

    hopefully random projects I can pick up through a studio/agency or on

    my own... ie, I want to be working full-time as a photographer.

     

    I have been more or less happy using the Hasselblad. The equipment

    receives a lot of use at the studio. Problems with counters on film

    backs, film not advancing correctly, prisms failing, and main springs

    failing. I sense this may be the result of doing a lot of shooting

    and any system may/will fail with so much use...so I dont

    necessarilly think of Hasselblad as unreliable(but maybe i should).

    Having said that, I HATE the new PME45. It is very slow to meter.

    Hand holding the Hasselblad is awkward. It seems like the i and

    especially the af, come very close to bridging the gap between the

    merits of af in 35mm and larger neg of MF. I do enjoy a more

    journalistic look and I'm considering whether the af version is worth

    the extra $$ to me.

     

    Therefore, I've seriously considered the Rollei system. Seems like a

    great system. How have others gotten around the lack of rental

    options? Do you just have a lens or whatever shipped to you for

    rental? Seems viable, but much more expensive. I've also heard

    international warrenties are not honored by Rollei USA, is this still

    true?

     

    FYI, I havent been able to locate a dealer in Denver who has the

    6008i or af in stock, so I havent held one in my hands.

     

    Thanks

×
×
  • Create New...