jodi_w

<p>I have never used Facebook ads myself, but I think just having a facebook/myspace page is a great and free method for reaching potential clients. Or I guess any social networking site for that matter.<br>

<strong></strong><br>

I bet you can ask any bride if they have a Facebook or Myspace and they will say yes.<br>

<strong></strong><br>

We have them and it is great way to also keep in touch with clients and other vendors should you become 'friends' with them on these sites.</p>

<p>I really like this image, but the fence really bothers me. Would it be okay to take it out? I would have taken it out and blow out the backgraoud just a bit more. This is what I would have done:<br>

But maybe now it looks too fake? I just really didn't care for the fence... but I love everything else about the image</p><div></div>

<p>I agree with Jon, but I think I use PS a little more- it's about 90% in LR and 10% PS for me.<br>

LR is faster for working on the colors, and exposures, because I just have to fix one (in a similar setting) and then sync similar images to the settings. <em></em><br>

I know you can ‘batch process’ in PS by writing actions then applying them to a folder, but LR is SO much faster for that, and I actually found creating actions quite annoying - although I do batch resizing in PS, but not batch color correction/editing.<br>

However the rest is done in PS - like spot coloring, editing spots, album work, blending photos adding text etc.<br>

I've heard there are ways to do that that stuff LR too, but I actually took a digital imaging classes in college and they taught PS inside and out practically, and I don't feel the need to re-learn those techniques PS for LR when I know them so well already PS.<br>

If PS works for you then don't worry about it. I am a huge fan of PS, and it actually took some convincing to make to switch from LR to PS for me. But once I learned/realized how LR can really help make color corrections faster, I fell in love!</p>

<p>Thank you everyone for their help!<br>

No, I didn't look into any new software updates, when we bought the camera.<br>

Silly me - I just assumed, that it would all read fine as my 40D had been doing.</p>

<p> </p>

<p>The DNG update worked<br>

thank you!</p>

<p>Hello everyone, new to these board - and I am so glad I found them so far it had proven to be veru useful and helpful. =)</p>

<p>So, I am having trouble getting my images/files off any of my Lexar CF memory cards. <br>

Three in all, one is 8GB 300x, and two 4GB 133x.<br>

I open Adobe Bridge and select to get images from camera... it scans it and then pops up with an error that that it is not readable, or the correct format. I know all 3 of these cards were formatted in camera before use.<br>

The memory cards were used in a Canon 50D, all shot in RAW format.<br>

I thought something was wrong with Adobe Bridge, but it reads all my other cards just fine. I put in two 4GB cards (Dane-Elec brand) and they read just dandy, also all images shot in RAW. <br>

I have tried using a card reader and also directly from the Camera<br>

The Dane-Elec cards were used in a Canon 40D.<br>

I don't think the what camera they were used had antyhing to do with it, but does anyone know or had similar experiences? The only dirrerence between the cards are the brand and what camera used them.<br>

I have tried using the Canon software, but no matter what memory card I try it always freezes up while it is scanning the cards, but it doesn't freeze while reading the Dane-Elec cards.....<br>

Anyone else having trouble with Lexar cards or Adobe Bridge not reading them?<br>

I tried also importing them into Bridge and DNG but that didn't work either<br>

Can anyone offer any suggestions? Is it Lexar or me?</p>

<p>Thank you in advance for any help?<br>

I am hoping I am just missing something?</p>

<p> </p>