shupienis
-
Posts
105 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by shupienis
-
-
I always thought that the "EP" stood for "Ehrenrich Photoptical", the
sole authorized US importer for Nikon and "Nippon Kogaku" equipment.
-
I've just been scanning the 5x5 proofs from my lab (Newbrough Photo in Weirton, WV -- They're GREAT!) at 600 dpi. This gives me about 3000 x 3000 bitmaps. After I fill a folder, I use Photoshop automate > web image gallery at a quality of 7 and an image size of 20% or 25%.<br><br>
Here are some more samples... Enjoy!<br>
<a href="http://www.photo.net/photodb/presentation.tcl?presentation_id=75571"><img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=203762&size=sm" alt="Ohiopyle & Fallingwater"></a>
-
Here's another presentation of Kiev 88 images taken with my 88CM.
<center><a href="http://www.photo.net/photodb/presentation.tcl?presentation_id=74832"><img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=200996&size=sm"></a></center>
-
Hi Art --
I have the 80mm and a 2x converter. I have on order a 45 and 65 Mir, and a 180mm Sonnar. I'll keep you posted.
Meanwhile have a look:<br>
<center><a href='http://www.photo.net/photodb/presentation.tcl?presentation_id=74271'><img src='http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=199799&size=sm'></a> <a href='http://www.photo.net/photodb/presentation.tcl?presentation_id=72835'><img src='http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=195087&size=sm'></a></center>
-
I recently bought a Kiev 88cm and I would have liked to see lots of
pictures taken with one before buying it. I didn't find much.<br><br>
Here are a couple of my efforts to remedy that problem. What do you
think?<br><br>
<A HREF='http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=112655'>Kiev
Gallery 1</a>
<A href='http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=114098'>Kiev
Gallery 2</a><br><br>
Any other Kiev users out there who have lots of scans for us to look
at?
The Next 35mm Full Frame Digital Camera?
in Mirrorless Digital Cameras
Posted
I believe the marketing departments are missing the point. I want a sensor the same size as the film it replaces, so all my precious wide-angle lenses don't turn into short telephotos!
I really don't care how many zillion pixels -- this is a case where SIZE MATTERS!
I would prefer a 36x24mm low-density sensor to a 24x16mm high-density one which makes my $1800 14mm rectilinear ultra-wide do the same job that my $400 20mm does with film.
Then again, maybe *I* don't get it... The marketing department will be happy to sell me a new 9mm rectilinear ultrawide for $3600 next year...
And I won't even look in my MF and LF camera bags...
Bah! Phooey!