jake_bryant

Thanks for all the interesting replies.... Much to ponder and certainly digital MF is a option...

Ray,

 

If it were to be a MF 645, I'd take both a film back and digital..... Yes the size of neg is further away from the 4x5

unfortunately. But really I'm questioning the quality of the 67 Voigtlander as a suitable alternative to the 54. Mamiya is a

option of course, as would be a Fuji 69.

<p>View cameras I'm familiar with, but will not have a long time on every shot. MF SLR is a option, maybe a Phase One..... But the RF is so nice with Portra 400 Id take one anyway if I brought a MF with me. Nonetheless, it depends on how much better a 4x5 would be instead of a RF or MF SLR..... </p>

<p>I'm having difficulty in deciding which would be a better choice to take to Antarctica for landscapes and portraits. The output size of the prints will be about 50 inches. Even though the 5x4 will be superior quality, the practicalities of the very portable Voiglander Bessa III 667 would be a advantage.<br>

What do ye'all think?</p>

<p>thanks!</p>

<p>So its only a B&W jpeg regardless of the program? Whats the point? I guess its nothing like the Leica M Monochrome files the right?</p>

<p>Thanks... so why does the option exist if it just the same as capturing a normal colour file? </p>

<p>I have my D4 set to soft sepia monochrome in the D4 menu, but when I open the file in Aperture it become colour. I know the original D4 file is RGB but how do I get it to open in Aperture with the same colour in the D4.... any help appreciated.</p>

<p>Thanks!</p>

<p>I've got the opportunity to buy a CF 39 back for my 503cw. I was going to move over to the H system when this option arose, so now am pondering the balance. However, now I'm wondering what the big difference is between the CF39 to the CFV 39?</p>

<p>Tim, thanks, I agree!</p>

<p>I did email him, but he said it was a secret recipe. We all know its not, he may well use bracketing but as he's a enthusiast photographer, I figure its just HDR toning in PP filters, and nothing more. I was only interested in the setting and some colours, but as HDR is so vomit tacky, I wouldn't spend time it. </p>

<p>Its not a style I like, but its somehow interesting in this setting. He used a D300s, with a 10mm DX fisheye. Says its not a plugin but rather a method in lightroom and PS.....</p>

<p>Dave, the sweet spot is about right regarding the 40mm on the D3. I find it to be a perfect focal length for full length portraits. My 85mm is great for head and shoulders of course, and with my 24-70, I usually find I'm shooting at 38mm- ish for full lengths. The 40mm just seems perfect somehow.</p>

<p>Hi All,<br>

Does anyone know how this effect can be achieved in photoshop? Or do you think its just a plugin?<br>

http://500px.com/photo/35539088</p>

<p>Interesting... thanks!</p>

<p>I'm shooting full frame on a D3, and find my 40mm Voigtlander to me superb for full length portraits. But is there a recommended focal length for 35mm full length portraits? Rather like a 300mm for large format for example.</p>

 

Theodoros, I agree with Paul wholeheartedly, it's better to ignore those who are belligerent in their posts, there's always

one.

 

Marc, this is right about what these tools can do in the hands of photographers. But I think it' becomes a problem when

the marketing strategy for 'reducing a fluid competitive secondhand market', for these great tools, gets people's goat.

I think this explains it all..... http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kQFKtI6gn9Y

Lol

<p>Lol...</p>

<p>This reminds me of Monty Python's sketch of 'is the the place to come to for a argument'.</p>

<p> </p>

Yes I agree, I have avoided buying A P1 or H system due to the changing goal posts in the MF market. Just easier to

hire them for certain jobs. But my V system should have a D back at some stage, which I hope to can enjoy for years and

years without the ball ache of throw away digital products. Mobile phone companies are masters at marketing

upgrades. I understand this reasoning for business but using similar tactics for high grade pro MF cameras is a shame.

 

Create a loyalty base not a Monopoli!

<p>Well said Theodorus!</p>

Marc,

 

Please don't use the language, 'my my' etc. it is perceived as arrogant and obtuse, which serves not positive contribution

to the conversation.

All sounds like ball ache to me.