hstelljes
-
Posts
11,436 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by hstelljes
-
-
Maybe it's their dream or maybe it's mine.
-
5
-
-
-
I love nautical things and marinas' are near the top of the list. Let's see some boat action in this thread.
-
5
-
-
There is all kinds of growth, this happens to be the top of a cactus. What kind of growth have you captured?
-
4
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
4
-
-
Same here no photos, but we've had this problem before and they fixed it.......However this is what about 6 months in and we are still having problems. Hoping it's taken care of soon.
-
For about the last week or so I've noticed that when I click on my portfolio next to my image I go to someone else's portfolio then I'll click again and I'll get to go to my portfolio.....Getting tired of that for sure.
-
<p>For your situation the Canon 10-18 IS stm is perfect. Everyone has already listed its qualities, plus it will fit your budget the best. Good luck.</p>
-
<p>Thanks Gerry,that was well presented and quite thorough. I totally agree with Mr. Rammels' assessments. I'm just a hobbyist but enjoy the Olympus products, though I still have my Canon equipment, seems I can't make the break completely, oh well. Thanks again for the link.</p>
-
<p>Hi Sally, You've been given a great deal of excellent advice from the above posters. I would only add that if you are going to get very involved in macro photography then consider the aforementioned oly 60mm f2.8. It's quite good and you can even get one used for under 400. If it's going to be an occasional thing then pick one of the alternatives. Best of luck.<br>
Holger</p>
-
<p>Referring to image #2. Thats a very nice shot Elliot. The clarity and detail of the boys face is very good. I like the flute being blurred. I just recieved my od em1 and have the lumix 20mm already so I'm looking forward towards the possibilities. Again, a very nice image........Holger</p>
-
<p>I think for travel purposes having a telephoto zoom like the 14-140 already mentioned is a must. That with the 20mm and a longer 45, 60 or 75 would give you overall coverage and the speed for low light shots. Since you don't have in-body stabilization as in the Olympus bodies you will be looking at Panasonic stabilized lenses. Enjoy your trip.</p>
-
<p>The only thing I've heard is it will be an expensive video camera around 15K. Not an slr.</p>
-
<p>JC and Jim, Thanks much for the feedback. Jim you really addressed the same concern I'm having as far the dynamic range. I'm glad to here its improved. Thanks again.</p>
-
<p>Now that the panasonic g3 has been on the market for a while I was hoping to get some feedback/opinions about it. I have the G1 and was thinking about an upgrade. All answers and advice are much appreciated.</p>
-
<p>If you look at the imaging-resource.com site they have a hands on review and show some samples and comparisons. Based only on what I saw there it looks like a good step forward in imaging quality not just pixel count. There where however some ergonomic drawbacks according to the author of the article.</p>
-
<p>Well I suppose it also depends on your budget. I think I would go with 14-45, 45-200 and definitley the 20mm for low light situations. I am slowly becoming aware of the ISO issues with the GF1 and the two zooms are not fast lenses so make sure you have something to cover those situations. I myself am waiting for the 100-300 so I can't comment on it yet. Have a great trip and post your photos when you return. Take care.</p>
-
<p>I previously had the tamron 17-50 non IS it was and is an excellent lens but seriously can't compare to the canon 17-55 IS. Granted it is twice the price but I believe the question was 17-55 or 24-70 in which case I still vote for the 17-55 especially for the 60D. Just my two-cents.</p>
-
<p>I highly recommend the canon 10-22 but if thats to pricey have you looked at the tamron 10-24. I'm not sure of its price but worth a look.</p>
-
<p>As great a temptation as it maybe to get the 7D I too say the lens comes first. The speed and reach of that lens is a bigger difference maker than an upgrade of any camera body. Some may suggest a tele-converter for your 85mm f1.8 but you will sacrifice a stop and still not have the zoom ability which is real nice in a gym setting. Hope this helps.</p>
-
<p>Akira, Roy and Gerry thanks for your responses. Gerry thats an extremely good link, very very helpful. Thanks so much. Take care.<br>
Holger</p>
-
<p>I have the Pany G1 and while I like it I'm not in love with their 45-200 lens. I was wondering about the recently introduced 100-300 and if anybody out their has it and their true feelings about its performance. Also I'm open to other lenses that you think would work well with the G1. Thanks for your time.</p>
Can't view galleries, photos
in PhotoNet Site Help
Posted