paul_mori

<p>@ Peter J <em>Please put a stop to this. It has spiralled out of control and at present has nothing remotely related to photography. </em>And who do we have to thank for that? I repeatedly asked H.P. if he had anything to contribute, and if not then he could keep his fingers away from the keyboard. </p>

<p>@ Mark Pierlot <em>I think the moderators should be maintaining a minimum standard of decorum in this community.</em><br /> Me too. But it should start with with censoring H.P. for his baseless accusation of motive.</p>

<p>Or can you not see that? You're a photographer. Can you not see how some random person claiming you want to attract attention is way out of line?</p>

<p>I may use strong words at times, but it's not without justification.</p>

<p>The Internet is rife with people like H.P. who have nothing to contribute. So, STAY ON TOPIC and all's fine.</p>

<p>Also, if some of you live such sheltered lives that you can't handle strong words. I'd say come and do some conflict photography. Live a bit and see what the world's like.</p>

<p>@H.P. <em>Why drag Bob into this? </em>I already have, not that he'll probably give a shit.<br>

And after this, I won't be discussing anything with you you cunt.</p>

<p>Others are welcome.. :)</p>

<p>@H.P.<em> Now show us some of your pictures, so we can advise you. </em><br>

<br /> I don't have time for that game. I am not here for that. You've read the thread title. Now if you've nothing else to add...</p>

<p>Is photo.net usually this bad? I can see there are some genuine people here. But H.P., why do you even bother? Do you use the combination of cameras and lenses in the thread title? Do you have <em>anything</em> to add? What are you? Another, what? Internet loser?<br>

<br /> Come on, tell me your experience of using the 5D MKIII w/16-35 alongside a 7D w/24-70, please?</p>

<p>@H.P. <em>I just don't like people swearing at me. I tend to react badly.</em><br>

<br /> Well, then you know what to do don't you? Or do you?<br>

<br /> You could start by not making baseless insinuations as to peoples motives. Another hint is to stay on topic. And if you've nothing constructive to say, keep your fingers away from the keyboard.<br>

<br /> Peter, it's more of a turn off to read through worthless posts that contribute nothing to our practice, and which seem little more than Internet baiting.</p>

<p>Firstly, Philip. Thank you for your input.</p>

<p>H.P., get fucked. You know nothing about me. I am wanting intelligent discussion about gear.</p>

<p>My attitude? You started being a wanker by insinuating I was after attention. I realise the Internet is full idiots, but come on, at least try to moderate the snotty remarks.</p>

<p>That being said, thanks for you 10c worth regarding your preferred 'slice of life' kit.</p>

<p>I'd like to keep this discussion, however brief it might be, focussed and without snide remarks.</p>

<p>Marcus, you too?! I am not in a raging tizzy, you git. You deserve that comment. If someone insinuates your intentions are to be a poser then you have the right to call them out on it, don't you?<br /> <br /> BTW you are not corresponding with some amateur here. Hence the level of kit under discussion and my desire for the opinions of people with IQ's higher than a carrot.</p>

<p>Thanks, Michael. Good man. I've been thinking it would be a very useful events combination going from (approx.) 16mm - 110mm.<br>

I'm interested in your opinion of image qualities between the two cameras with their respective lenses, particularly the background blur. If a foreground figure is in focus, and the back thrown out, do images from either camera (sensor and focal length notwithstanding) match reasonably well? When you've downloaded the day's shoot how do they compare?<br>

Thanks again,<br>

Paul. </p>

<p>Internet opinion can amount to less than a pile of horseshit, but IMHO as a user of a MKIII for event photography.</p>

<p>Forget the MKIIs.</p>

<p>I'd rather have a 5D MKIII <em>and</em> a 650D.</p>

<p>@H.P. What the hell? If you've nothing constructive to say then please fuck off.</p>

<p>Is this forum for photographers or Rockwell Level 0'ers?</p>

<p>I'm not interested in theories, but the sane opinions of anyone actually using this combo or with a 5D MKII...</p>

<p>Are there any working photogs or amateur documentary/street photogs here that are using this combination; 5D MK3 w/16-35 and 7D w/24-70?<br>

Thoughts, considerations, practicalities?</p>

<p>Thanks,<br>

Paul.</p>

<p>I took some nighttime photos of lightning. I had a polarizer on the lens at the time; quick shots at 1.30am didn't remove the filter.<br>

<br /> After facebook's compression the banding is horrible. Here at photonet it's nowhere near as bad. <br>

There was a lot of atmospheric rain/mist around.<br>

5D MKIII, 24-70MM f2.8L, 100iso, 30" @ f5.6, C-Pol.</p>

<p><br /> Thanks.</p><div></div>