hey josh, i've been shooting in raw for years now and would never turn back. the flexability it gives you is priceless. you sound like you are shooting with some wicked gear, so i think maybe its time for your software to catch up.
lightroom. i wouldn't say you need to get lightroom 2, but lightroom none the less. it will give you all the raw processing you need and if you don't do a lot of heavy alteration, may even keep you from using photoshop. i don't know how much you like to manipulate your photos, but all the basic stuff for raw files (and a little extra) is in there.
bridge is a cheaper alternative if you already have it, but then you are still jumping back and forth between programs.
if you want one place for most of your work flow, then lightroom is it. if you need more info i would suggest checking out scott kelby's books, or blog. his writing is really accessible and also, he's a funny guy.
D300 - ISO range question
in Nikon
Posted
hey josh, i've been shooting in raw for years now and would never turn back. the flexability it gives you is priceless. you sound like you are shooting with some wicked gear, so i think maybe its time for your software to catch up.
lightroom. i wouldn't say you need to get lightroom 2, but lightroom none the less. it will give you all the raw processing you need and if you don't do a lot of heavy alteration, may even keep you from using photoshop. i don't know how much you like to manipulate your photos, but all the basic stuff for raw files (and a little extra) is in there.
bridge is a cheaper alternative if you already have it, but then you are still jumping back and forth between programs.
if you want one place for most of your work flow, then lightroom is it. if you need more info i would suggest checking out scott kelby's books, or blog. his writing is really accessible and also, he's a funny guy.