alfred_hewitt

<p>I had a k100d as a first cam, then moved to a k20d. I wouldn't put the k20d's learning curve as steep, as there is always the auto "program" mode to fall back to. I find my k20d to be simpler to use as there are more buttons and controls for things vs having to use the menu to get to things in my k100d.<br>

I think the real learning curve is that of learning the basics of photography (aperture, shutter speed, iso, ect.)<br>

If you're looking for a used one, there is also another pentax forum that has a marketplace (cough) where you can find them for 600 or slightly less.<br>

If he doesn't want to invest a whole lot, you might be able to pick up a K10D which has the same controls for under 400, the high iso performance is a bit lacking on that body though.</p>

<p>The "A" 35-70 f4 (constant) is the best of the bunch for the reviews I've read. I owned it briefly and it performed just fine and was sharp. Mine too was loose, but not a problem. $50 is a fair price, I'd value it at around 50-70 bucks anyways. The macro / close focusing of this lens is really what makes it different. </p>

I'll remove it, sorry guys, didn't see the classified section

If you need an excuse to get one of these, upgrade your body, or to get a 2nd body, this is it.

Mint/Like New condition, includes EVERYTHING, boxes, cables, paperwork.

Kit lens put one once, and taken off once.

 

http://www. pentaxforums.com

/forums/photographers-marketplace/40630-k20d-kit-grip-da55-300-m85-a35-105-k45-125-a35-70-a70-210-a.html

 

remove spaces from the url

I have the Sigma 18-50 2.8 Macro and am happy with it, someday I might upgrade to the Pentax for weather sealing and SDM.

 

If your focus is indoors or low light, get one of the constant 2.8 lenses, the Pentax, Tamron and Sigma are all great lenses, the only one I would avoid is the Sigma 18 50 2.8 that isn't the macro version.

 

If you want more all around I'd go for either of the 17-70 recommended earlier.

 

Good luck