cardens

<p>Practice. Shoot little videos around your house and edit them. If you have a pet, make a video about the pet or a day in the life of. Use different angles when shooting the same thing and you will learn what you think looks best. <br>

You will quickly be able to look at your footage and see how you should have done it to achieve the look you want. Film, Edit it and film some more.</p>

<p>Thank you everyone for the awesome responses. I am thinking at this point I am going with the d3s and may just buy another d7000 for video (since I want a 3rd camera). Eventually buy a d800 for video (maybe in a year or so).<br>

The d3s has the speed I want for photography and when compared to the d800 (in terms of photography) is exactly what I need.</p>

<p>I don't need a slow camera that will take up tons of space for weddings. It may just give me an additional headache.</p>

<p>Thank you again everyone</p>

<p>Thanks Andrew. A few very good points there. I currently use the battery grip on the d700 and am always using available light and pushing my ISO capabilities.</p>

<p>I apologize Shun, I worded that wrong, I do upload smaller samples for previews. But I was thinking for print orders the images sizes will be larger even in jpg.</p>

<p>Walt - My D700 is at over 225k clicks right now and I have noticed things starting to not work as well as it they once did. My AF is way slower then it used to be. If I was not looking for a camera with video capabilities I would probably just go for another d700. But I really want to have that on my next camera so when I am filming weddings I have an extra (better) body for that.</p>

<p>I am looking at used d3s's. Something under 5k clicks. New ones are going for about $6000. Which is not in my budget.</p>

<p>As far as the D4, I do not see it being worth the return in my circumstance. My clients will be getting the same end product and putting out that kind of money just does not seem worth it to me at this point.</p>

<p> </p>

<p>I have seen this question asked here, but my situation is a little different, so I am just looking for some input/advice.</p>

<p>First - I have been a professional wedding photographer for 5 years. As of last year we began cinematography in our studio as well. <br>

I shoot weddings with a d700. I shoot cinematography with D7000's.<br>

My d700 has been worked non stop for about 3 years and although it still does the job, it is time for a replacement. With the recent release of the d800 I thought that would be the answer. However I rented one for a weekend and the file sizes range from 20-40 megabytes per image. So that got me thinking if I get the d800 i will need to buy more storage (external drives) as well as invest in more DVD's (cases stickers etc) for the brides final product. Also more than likely invest in more RAW on both my imac and macbook pro.<br>

Considering my internet is DSL ( no other option) just the uploading for albums and prints would be a factor with the file size. On a side not I LOVED the product it produced with filming a wedding.<br>

Before the d800 came out I was leaning toward the D3s. Now after more consideration am leaning that way again. <br>

The d800 draws me because it is "new" technology and the images are more detailed (that a photographer could see anyway).</p>

<p>Any input on or ideas on this situation would be of much help.</p>

<p>Thank you</p>

<p> </p>

<p>Thank you David. Great idea!<br>

Marios, thank you for the wonderful list of ideas! I think I will print it out and put it with the rest of my planning materials. A huge help. The timeline is something I was questioning and I think 3 weeks to a month prior is perfect.<br>

Kevin in response to your questions. My purpose for a grand opening is I will be using it is an opportunity to reach out to different members and areas of the community. Making them aware we are indeed here and ready for new clients. <br>

I will be offering a raffle as well as gift certificates to those who stop by which will bring people back in the door and spread the word to others.</p>

<p>We placed our order for our new sign which should be in this week or next and I am very excited to be able to unveil it in time for the event. I have a lot more planning to do and ordering of displays and marketing materials to do, but I am optimistic!</p>

<p> </p>

<p>I just ordered new ones through mpixpro. I had them back in a day and they turned out very nice.</p>

<p>I have been a wedding photographer since 2007. This March we actually began renting a store front studio. Right now the studio is great for meeting potential bride/grooms and we have done a few portraits sessions. <br>

But I am finding it difficult to get the name out there to the local people. I am used to internet marketing with weddings. I have found portraiture is a bit different :)<br>

I really want to host a grand opening. We will be getting our sign made and put up out front and would like to have the ready for the official grand opening.<br>

Other than that I kind of do not know where to start! I definitely will be contacting local business's and ask if they would like to donate a product, in exchange for advertising. Flowers, cake etc. other than that I am kinda of at a loss what to do next.</p>

<p>Any ideas would be great.</p>

<p>I love the idea with the free bridal portrait or some type of "giveaway"!</p>

<p>I would have to agree with John A. It really seems like an over lap, being your friend will be at both weddings. The fact she is doing the pre-ceremony, ceremony and portraits is really the bulk of it anyway. Receptions are usually pretty boring (other than the formal dances and cake). <br>

You have to do what you feel comfortable with. Personally I wouldnt see the big deal. If you were to shoot the WHOLE wedding that would be a different story all together.</p>

<p>Hi, message me if you are still looking. </p>

<p>When I was just starting out, I was on wedalert and must have purchased 100 leads or more. I booked one wedding from those leads. The wedding that booked, did so primarily because I think I was the lowest priced one. <br>

I found it a total waste of time and money. </p>

<p>It is very hard to judge what kind of job you did based on one photo. Could you message me or post a way to see all the images from the wedding?</p>

 

<p>HORRIBLE customer service. Overharged my card 8 times. Absolute nightmare. I wish I had never heard the name graphistudio. STAY AWAY. Quality keeps going down. </p>

<p>William, I understand what you are saying and you have made valid points. If my daughter had a friend and her mom took pictures of them together, no I would be mad or upset at all. If she were on a field trip and the teacher snapped shots of the kids, I would be ok with that too.<br>

This situation is different. the photography (MWC) is doing this to MAKE MONEY. She has no child in the 6th grade. She is posting them on her BUSINESS facebook account not personal. She also posting them on her .com website that she markets and puts online for the world to see. <br>

So if she wants to make some money I think it should be done the right way which is why the whole legality of this has come up. Have permission slips, set up a booth OUTSIDE the dance area and have pictures taken with permission by the parents to purchase prints.<br>

Again, if MY 11-12 year old daughter is dancing/having fun, maybe even dancing with a boy, I certainly dont think those private moments are for some woman to hone in on, take advantage of sell for her own profits.</p>

<p>ps - the "photographer" does not have any kids in the 6th grade.</p>

<p>Thanks Bobbi, that is one concern I have. Their are pedophiles trolling facebook for these very reasons.<br>

The reason I am asking about this is because I am a mother and tax payer for this school. My daughter is not in 6th grade yet. But I know if I saw my daughters images (dancing laughing etc) on someones website for the world to see and facebook for people to see and buy, I would be upset. it doesnt sit well with me at all. <br>

Its one thing to have a setup at the dance and kids (and parents) can choose to have their photo taken. They stand in front of the setup and smile. But kids who are just there to have fun and be themselves should not be photographed by a photographer who will later post them on the internet without anyones permission.<br>

What is comes down to is I am asking this question as a legal concern not if people think its ok or "right", although I appreciate everyones input.</p>

<p>She is a "business" has a business I should say. She has a website and not sure about a tax ID. <br>

It is a public school. <br>

She considers herself a pro photographer. Most parents do not even know about this or know their child will be photographed and have their image sold.</p>

<p>I got wind that a Mom with Camera will be going to the local 6th grade dance to take pictures. She has not permission slips from the parents. She plans on selling the images on her website and facebook for a $1 a 4x6. Is this legal?</p>

<p>Thank You</p>

<p>It was right before we left, I took the couple outside the reception for some cool outdoor shots, since we were in a city type setting. She followed us out and to be honest, I knew she was there, but didnt really notice her snapping away. This is def a learning lesson for me. I appreciate everyones feedback.</p>

<p>Very true David.<br>

Nadine, thanks for your opinion. I think you are probably right. I have the memory cards she used to shoot with. I am thinking to not include any of the images that were my idea with the bride and groom. PLus I am watermarking everyone. <br>

This is a lesson learned for me. The second shooter that usually works with me never posed this problem as they are a student, looking for the money and to have a fun experience on the weekend.</p>

<p>in the contract she signed it says all images are sole property of my company. So if I wanted to I could say she cant use any of them. But I just dont feel good about that.<br>

Thanks Theresa glad I am not alone on this.</p>

<p>I had a second shooter work with me for a wedding this past saturday. It was this first time we worked together. The only images she did 100 percent on her own was the groomsmen. They came out well which I am happy about.<br>

However later on when I was shooting the bride and groom, she was taken pretty much identical shots as mine. Of course my poses and the locations I chose. I said she can use images she took for her facebook and maybe blog, but my watermark will be on them and she can edit them how she wishes. However she lives in the same area as me and I am kind of not liking the idea she will have the same couple and same location and posing I use and she will be taking credit for them as her pictures. I dont mind her using the images she took on her own at all. But the ones I was "directing" not so much. <br>

Any advice and input would be great. thank you!</p>

<p>I agree Jen. For every couple images a client posts, all of the their friends see that image. If they like it, they just may be your next client..</p>

<p>I have a d300 as a primary body (switching to either the d3 or d700 early next year).<br>

My husband and I shoot the weddings together so he also has a d300. We needed a backup so I got a d200 and d70. I use the d70 over the d200. I dont suggest you get the d70 as a backup but I just want to put it out there how much the d200 doesnt even really compare to the d300. I would suggest getting a used d300. On ebay you can get one in good shape for around 1200-1400 bucks. Very much worth it.<br>

Also once you have a d700, and use it low light you will see how the d200 is NO comparision.<br>

One more thing with the lenses. I started with a 50mm 1.8. I would HIGHLY suggest spooning out the extra $200 for the 1.4 version. The colors are much better, and in dressing rooms with low light you want the 50mm 1.4</p>

<p>I actually become "friends" on facebook with some brides that I do their wedding for. I post images up and tag them in it. They love it. If they do post images from their cd, everyone has given me credit for it so I really dont mind.</p>