chris cornwell blog

<p>That was the problem. I thought the exposure would be the same. I had to adjust everything to 'see' the picture. I also have a hard time FOCUSING- AF, whether it is something moving or stationary. I had to switch to 'Manual'.</p>

<p>The exposure is right. I've been outside in broad daylight to shoot as well.</p>

<p>I just received a new D800 and simply can't figure out the VIDEO function. I have been using a D700 for several years and all the other functions are easy to understand. Yes, I have a read the manual (D800) on HOW TO get started with video. But, the video file i recorded is almost 'black' like the exposure is all wrong. Sound recorded just fine. I snapped an image first with proper exposure and then switched to live view to record. Am I missing a step or two? PLEASE help!! Thanks!</p>

<p>I'm not sure what I'm viewing when I view it on APERTURE. I import all my NEW images directly into APERTURE. So, I assume I'm looking at the raw file. I tweek white balance, exposure, etc. there. I have not done any sharpening on any of the files. How do I check if there is a sharpening 'default'? </p>

<p>My images are sharp when viewed on APERTURE. After a few tweeks, I export to Photoshop to add 'my style'. However, I notice that the images opened in Photoshop are not as sharp as the ones in Aperture. Same photo, different sharpness. I've tried exporting both: psd, tiffs versions. Is there something I'm doing or not doing when 'exporting'?<br>

Thanks!<br>

Chris</p>

<p> </p>

<p>I don't have a lot invested in terms of lenses, etc. I use my 50mm, f1.4 exclusively for portrait work (it was FREE!) and just bought a SB-600. I usually rent lenses for weddings. I have spent money on a cheaper camera and lenses but sold them for almost nothing (when I was starting out). I would probably lose $$$ when I sell the d300.</p>

<p>I am considering a switch as well. I have used the d300 and now the d700. I love them both but they are no match for quality and clarity (in my opinion) to the 5dMarkii. I had the opportunity to try a 5dmarkii out but couldn't get use to the functions. Everything seem to be opposite. Maybe I didn't give it time. What was your experience with the switch? How long did it take you to 'relearn' the functions? Thanks!</p>

<p>Thanks Bela..I'll keep that in mind the next time.</p>

<p>THANKS to everyone who offered some light in the end of the tunnel! David: I was using my laptop at home when I posted the question. The only copy I had was a SOOC shot I downloaded from my camera. I edit everything on the desktop at work and the CS2 is in that computer.<br>

I usually put WB on AUTO and expose for the face and 'thought' I could tweek the WB if needed (in RAW).</p>

<p>I thought I did that too, so I looked at my camera and there IS a TIFF setting just after RAW under QUAL.</p>

<p>I do not have a program on my home laptop for bmp conversion.</p>

<p>Here's another version SOOC in jpeg.</p><div></div>

<p>Here's a sample. Post processed in CS2. I'm not sure why her hair has a bluish cast to it. Any tip is appreciated! Thanks!</p>

<p>I recently did a Bridal Shoot and it turn out great! So, I thought. I didn't realise I switched from RAW to TIFF about 1/3 way into the shoot by mistake. I shot with +1/3 exposure compensation, manual, spot metering with a D300. The Bride wore a lacy, ivory dress. Since I usually shoot in RAW, I was unable to 'tweek' the TIFF images for exposure, etc. How is TIFF different from RAW & JPEG? Should I have left the exposure compensation to 0 for the ivory dress? Most of the images were fine but many dress details were blown out. What can I do?</p>

<p>O..shucks! I was 'almost' excited! The lens is from my dad... he only buys the best and takes good care of his 'toys'. He does have a non dslr contax camera to fit it but I love my digital!</p>

<p>I have an opportunity to own a Contax 85mm, f/1.4 lens (FREE!!) but I have a D300 camera. I would like to find an adapter for the lens but have no luck so far. Is it available? If yes, where can I find it? Store, website? What does an adapter do to the quality of the image and is it safe (for the camera)? Anyone? THANKS!</p>

<p>Well, I wanted a sharp image front to back. I'm a sucker for sharpness. I figure I ought to have a sharp image from a sharp camera and lens (hopefully). I'll try out both your suggestions. Thanks!!</p>

<p>SOOC shot</p>

<p>Here's an example of an exterior shot I took this morning:<br>

Cloudy<br>

f/22, 1/8s, ISO 400<br>

AF-S<br>

Dynamic 9 point<br>

Metering: matrix<br>

I have been taking mainly interior shots, f/22, using a tripod, non-moving objects, with somewhat good lighting. My shots with a kodak 'point and shoot' performed better overall. I do not have an interior shot to show (it's at the office).</p>

<div></div>

<p>AF</p>

<p>I recently purchased a 'Demo' Nikon 24mm, f2.8 lens from Adorama. It came in no time and packaged properly. It looked almost like new! However, I've been getting somewhat blurry shots with it, whether indoors or out, people or objects, even when using a tripod! Has anybody experienced this?<br>

I shoot manual with a D300 plus tripod especially for interior shots. Please help!</p>

<p>I try to focus at the eyes or 'eye' and have gotten really sharp images. So, I think my lens is doing what it should. However, I get more unfocused (eyes) images than not. Then, I tend to take several shots of the same look to make sure I have a sharp one.</p>

<p>Thanks everyone for your answers. I'll be working on those suggestions.</p>

<p>Near:<br>

I was focusing on one of her eyes. I will try using the single AF point next time for close ups. What about subjects more than 5 feet away?<br>

How can I improve my picture taking technique to obtain focused/sharp images- most of the time? Besides practising a lot.</p>

<p>Dynamic 9 points</p>