roman_thorn1

Thanks everyone.

Remember . . . In an RB kit, the 150 and the 180 are not interchangeable lenses. The 150 is designed with uncorrected spherical aberrations for use as a soft focus lens. In order to be sharp, the lens needs to be stopped down to at least f8 and even there it's not terribly sharp. The 180 is tack sharp throughout the f-stop range.

Hi Ed. Thanks for the reply. But I was referring to the less common 150 3.5. I know they made a soft focus though. Knowing that I can't unintentionally do double exposures makes me think the RB is preferable. Think the 127 would work really well indoors and the 180 outside. Really appreciate everyone's input.

Hello community. Looking for a little input. I've decided to add one of these RBsd/RZ kits to my 5x4. I'm only interested in using this camera for portrait work, in studio but also location. I will be using a tripod or good mono. I have some experience with the RZ + 110, but not any other combination. I'm taking into consideration my working space in studio and find the 110 to be an odd focal length, (albeit very beautiful) in that too short for anything tighter than half body and too long for full, unless out doors. Which makes me wonder if I'm not better off going with the pro/sd 90mm 3.5 and 127mm 3.5. I will be also throwing in a 180 for tighter framing when not in studio. Originally thought 110/150/180 with rz might be a good set up, but still think the 110 will not give me the right working distance for desired image. Anyway, just a bit of a brain dump. Would love for people to chime in. There's a ton of great images taken with the 110, not as many with the 127 nor the 150 3.5. Also last bit, I will need the motorized film back with the RB, possibly 6x8? Mostly so i don't have to worry about forgetting to advance the film.

 

R

Hello. Can anyone tell me if I can set a nikon F5 to fire 3 or more multiple exposures consecutively via self timer??

Thanks so much everyone, very helpful. I'm still leaning towards 8x10, but maybe start with 5x4 and invest in the nikkor-sw 120mm.

Hi. I’m sure similar question has been posted in the past: trying to decide between 8x10 and 4x5? My question is not which one is better but rather, is there any benefits to buying a 4x5 as a beginner when I know down the line I will still want to go to 8x10. There is a significant price difference, which I find a little strange since it’s just a light resistant box only a little bigger. My other question is, if I was to start with 4x5 as a learning tool, what normal wide lens (115mm-125mm) is available that has a big enough image circle for 8x10? Thanks in advance for any input you folks might have:)

 

R

<p>Curious, why do you prefer the 85 f2 John? I have a 100 2.8 series e that i love.</p>

<p>Okay thanks guys. There doesn't seem to be enough information. Maybe i'll try testing it myself and see how it behaves.</p>

<p>Hello everyone. I just bought this camera. I know it's fully automated, but does anyone know how the camera determines right exposure? For example, will it choose fastest aperature before slowing down shutter or? What is the balance. I know i can make some changes in exposure with iso, but not sure to what affect?</p>

Thanks for the input� Patrick, I should have mentioned the Pentax 645n ( autofocus) and currently I use the Epson v500

and it does ok with 35mm but pretty darn well with 6x6. I was asking because I've been considering the f100 for a while

and then came across the Pentax. I'm a street/social documentary shooter and love my mechanical cameras, but I have

been doing more portrait and event work as of late and wanted a automated camera that would give me fantastic results.

At the price you can get these now, it wouldn't require much effort to save up for both. Love how digital has made these

wonderful cameras accessible to all.

Hello everyone. I realize this is not an apples to apples comparison, but all things equal, lighting, subject and conditions, which will

produce better results for portraits.

<p>Thanks folks. Think I might give the bolt a try:)</p>

<p>Hi. I want to use a small ring flash on my Nikon Fe2 or Fm3a and 55 micro. What are my options? Advice would be greatly appreciated!</p>

<p>Thanks for all the great input...really appreciate it. So, I decided on a 35mm f2 ais as a compromise and when I get back dive into medium format. Not having much experience, would a 645 Mamiya be a good choice for location portraiture. I am also considering the Bronica. Thanks again for the good advice:-)</p>

<p>Oh, I was thinking it was closer to a 35mm equivalent. And personally, I'm with you. I prefer those characteristics in a lens. I don't care for clinical perfection. Also, do you know what differences there are between the Ai and Ais version?</p>

<p>Hi. Sorry, the subject heading isn't all that clear. I'm taking a road trip and debating about what would be a better choice to bring along? I'm wanting to buy a nikon 35mm 1.4 Ais or a mamiya super 645 with a sekkor 80mm 2.8. I can't afford both. Surprisingly, they go for about the same$$, slightly less for the Mamiya. I'm mostly interested in documentary and environmental portraiture. Which set up will give me more Umff, more punch!? Btw, my main set up will be an Fe2 with 50mm f2 and 100mm f2.8</p>

<p>Hi. Thanks for all the handy info. I've been doing more digging around and think I will settle on a bronica SQ A or ai? I like the size, totally modular, pretty inexpensive, 6x6 format and has a leaf shutter:)</p>

<p>Hi folks! So I'm really interested in moving into medium format, though I know so little. I've been told it can be a steep learning curve. I'm not a newb when it comes to photography, so I think I will catch on quickly...hoping. I "think" I have decided on Bronica as a good budget oriented system. My Niche would be portraits. I'm thinking 6x6 or 6x4.5 maybe? There seems to be a number of models to choose from, (ec, ec tl, sq) My question is, which would be best for studio work. I want to use my nikon speed lights and radio triggers. Do all models have a hot shoe and sync port? Also I want a 40mm + 80mm equivalent in 35mm terms. Any advice would be much appreciated...cheers!<br>

Roman</p>

<p>Hello. I'm going back and forth debating between which prime lens might be a better choice for my photography. I'm still shooting film, but planning on acquiring a digital (DX) body in the near future, (not as a replacement though). My two choices right now are the Voigtlander 58 1.4 sl ii or the nikon 85 1.8 D. I'm focused on portraiture, not so much head and shoulders but more environmental. I like my images to tell a story. I'm always trying to put my subject in context to something. Anyway, on full frame the 58 seems perfect, even the 85. However on a cropped sensor, the 85 gets a bit too long. Still very useful for other occasions though. Currently my go to is my 40mm f2 voigtlander...which I love. A perfect normal for my eye. That and a 28 2.8 Ais. I have a nikon Fm3a and an F4. I don't need Af, but also would be of benefit with the F4. Any thought on these two choices and how they might compare both optically and in regards to perspective?<br>

Roman</p>

<p>Hello. Has anyone compared these on film? Cost aside, would there be much difference? I'm interested in Food photography and portraiture. I'm also a minimalist, hence my wish for an optic that can handle both genres well. My current set up for every day use, is a Nikon fm3a with a voigtlander 40mm f2. Adding a 100/105 seems like a good fit. All input welcome...</p>

<p>Roman</p>

<p>right:)</p>

 

<p>This is not so much a debate but rather a question and maybe topic that might bare some discussion? So after a few years of relegating myself to taking images via smart phone, I am now sorely missing the thrill of photography and looking to re-invest. I say 're-invest' because I left the craft or industry for lack of a better word for a steady 9-5 income. Truth is, my equipment never really cost me a dime. I always made my money picking up gigs, more than enough to finance my passion anyway. So why did i sell you ask? Well between a 40+hr work week and shooting events in my off time, (which I didn't much enjoy...weddings), not to mention family responsibilities and obligations, I rarely if ever found time to just shoot for me:( Fast forward to now, and I am finding myself more often than not regretting my decision to sell. Well, not really I suppose. At the time, I think it was the right call. Anyway, with that out of the way, I am looking to take the plunge again and not look back. My goal is to still supplement my income through photography. I have some great ideas, but this time it will be on my terms. So let me just say, my interest lie in landscape, nature, Architecture, still life, street and dogs. I'm considering investing into two systems: canon FF and Fuji x. Honestly, I'm a little concerned with where and how fast the mirrorless movement is going. That is, I'm concerned with obsolescence. What will happen to The DSLR, or better yet the costly lenses I plan to throw money on. I suppose I can't fret about the future. The here and now is what should concern me the most. Currently canon has the tools I need to best exploit my photographic vision and so go for it...right? Yikes! Anyway here is my equipment choice which best suits my needs...I think:<br>

Canon: 6D maybe 5D iii<br>

17mm TS e<br>

135mm f2<br>

180mm macro<br>

Fuji Xe 2:<br>

14mm f2.8<br>

23mm f1.4<br>

60mm f2.4<br>

Okay, like I said, this is not so much of a debate as it is a discussion. For all intense purposes, I would really appreciate your input...cheers!</p>

<p>Hello everyone! It's been a while since I posted here, hope you all have been busy taking great photos? Anyway, my story: recently i dumped all of my DSLR gear, realizing I was no longer enjoying carrying it around for personal use. It was fine when I was doing gigs to earn a few extra dollars, but once i decided to stop (got tired of the hustle), I found myself no longer interested in carrying around the weight. I still shoot…please don't laugh, but I'm kind of enjoying the simplicity of my htc one phone. Anyone who has been shooting for some time knows that gear has little to do with what makes a good image anyway. Still, too many creative limitations:-( So, I have been doing research and reading threads but would like some feed back…please. Yes i know this question has been asked before but not by me so if you don't mind, please humour me :-) I have narrowed it down to these two options: epl 5 with 25 1.4 or nex6 with 35 1.8 Keep in mind I am also considering the new fuji x20 as a last option and step down from both of these. In my experience, the best camera is the one you have on you when needed. The fuji would be an easy every day carry and way better than my htc. That said, the first two seem like viable options. Things i want: great ergonomics. external controls like exposure comp, image stabilization, great image quality (accurate colors), good AF, built in flash for day light fill (not deal breaker), easy to navigate menu system, wifi and of course…needs to be small! These two systems fit the bill…now which? leaning towards nex because epl is missing the flash and built in wifi…any thoughts?</p>

<p>Hello! I'm wanting to sell my D300. It's in fantastic condition, but does have 32K actuations. I've never had a problem with it. Curious, what should I be asking for it. Box, manuals, Charger, battery and 4, 4gig cards all included. I want to be fair but not feel as though I am giving it away. Your input would be appreciated…cheers!</p>

 

<p>No! This may sound a little harsh, but my thoughts are…spend more time focussing on your photography, put the money in the bank and sit on it for a while. Nikon and Canon are such competing brands, they're always trumping one another. So give it some time and when you know exactly what you need and why, I'm certain you will be able to find the right piece of equipment in the Canon line up. I my self am guilty of wanting to do the same thing from time to time. Eventually I come to my senses, stop worrying about what lens or camera might make me a better photographer and just shoot. In my opinion, the camera industry prey on people like you and me, in all fairness to survive. Do your self a favour, don't buy into all that marketing hype, you'l be much better off!</p>

<p>Hi! Quick question. I'm shooting images that will go in a brochure for the public library. The brochure just outlines services available to the public. Do I need a model release by anyone not directly working for the library. So for example, If I take a picture of the computer stations while they are in use will I need a release? Thanks in advance for any input...cheers!</p>