zweeko
-
Posts
291 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by zweeko
-
-
might be the jasselblad 🙃
-
can you make calls from a camera?
-
and the titanic?
-
sadly not. [as a 10x leica camera-owner - M, R, screw]
-
colino: maybe try an olympus trip 35 [or similar zone-focus camera] - you're automatically-focused, so long as you have a half-decent perception of distance!
- 1
-
i'd be surprised if it were any different to the trip35system: 5 = 1965, 4 = april.
- 1
-
just get a Trip 35 and be done with it! zweeko’s albums | Flickr
-
<p>if No Battery Required is appealing, olympus trip 35 all the way!</p>
-
-
-
-
<p>erm: about half of the cameras mentioned, so far, are Not battery-independent - even the OP's! : B</p>
-
<p>a bit late, but: olympus trip 35 [1967-1984 - 40mm f/2.8] - http://www.flickr.com/photos/zweeko/sets - i'll have to wait for the next one!</p>
-
<p>having owned all the cameras/systems you have mentioned, i'd have to say that all you'd be gaining by going from om to f2 would be a lot more bulk & the ability to change viewfinders - plus you'd have to adapt to the nikkors' direction-of-turning, when it comes to aperture/focus [if you're not already familiar with it]. although i dearly loved my f2 set-up, i couldn't imagine going back to them, since going the om-1 route.</p>
-
-
-
-
-
<p>i once owned an olympus trip 35 - serial number: 3353535 : ]</p>
-
-
-
-
<p>a. none whatsoever.<br>
b. none whatsoever.<br>
c. none whatsoever.<br>
d. none whatsoever.<br>
e. none whatsoever.</p>
<p>merry christmas!</p>
-
<p>it's not a dare, but from the images in your favourites-portfolio, i think you would get on very well with the 40mm lens! more info./inspiration, here: http://www.flickr.com/groups/olympustrip35/</p>
Sensitive high ISO film?
in Medium Format
Posted
try it in a hasselblad & see what happens 😋