<p>Hi, Thanks once again for all the responses, it is really helpful..<br>
So the more I look into it, I come across the same views.. <br>
Basically, the Sigma is a bit of a dog to use (both in shooting and in post) but the image quality is amazing (both for the cost and size).<br>
I have a Ricoh GR and would lump this roughly in the same league as the Fuji.. A pleasure to use and can sync at the flash speeds I am after..<br>
I do like the fact that the Sigma does come in a series of focal lengths that all provide the same amazing image quality..<br>
I guess you could argue for a similar concept with the Fuji and both its wide angle conversion and teleconverter lens. (28,35,50)<br>
Would be interesting to see when someone gets a DP1Q and throws the Ricoh wide angle lens on it (assuming the filter thread is the same as the Sigma DP1M)<br>
Still, from just viewing images online, there is definitely something about the "look" of the Sigma.<br>
:)</p>