laceyhughes

November 30, 2010

Wow, I feel a little out of place here. My first digital camera is the one I still use, my Olympus E500. Prior to that I shot with an Olympus OM1. I still shoot with the OM1 from time to time. The only P&S (not counting cell phone) camera I own is actually the one I bought for my son on his 4th birthday, so it's not really mine. I do have plans to get my hands on the new E5. At that point I'm sure my E500 will be passed to my son. Cameras around here are used until they are completely dead.

I'm sure at some point I will look back on it all in awe. I already do when it comes to cell phones. I still have all of them from the past 12 years. It's really fun to look back and see the progression of technology in any form!

November 28, 2010

It all depends on your budget and what you will be doing with your photos, i.e. selling them... You mentioned enlargements. How big are you expecting to print? There are programs that allow you to enlarge your digital files to print larger; OnOne had a pretty decent one. Personally I use Adobe Photoshop CS5 / Adobe Lightroom 2 for my processing. I have used CS4 for enlargements and was pretty happy with the outcome. Like I said, it all depends on what you planned applications.

November 28, 2010

My inspiration comes from my son and anywhere I can take him. Whether it be the neighborhood park, or the "backyard" state parks. No more than an hour in any direction from us and we can be in a bigger city, the mountains, the ocean, etc. We can watch whales year round, hike in the mountains, play on glaciers in the summer. There is so much around us that even when we visit the same places, it's like being there for the first time again. My goal is to capture pieces from our adventures. Maybe to serve as reminders of who we are, and where he have been. Something my son can keep long after I am gone, and pass them on if he so chooses. And in the meantime I photograph the little things in the world around us. That leaf that normally would just get stepped over, the little ant crawling over that wild flower, the spider that attacked your head above the doorway, the snowflakes on Thanksgiving day... I do it all for him. He is my world.

November 27, 2010

Ken, really if you're not happy with Olympus, MOVE SOMEWHERE ELSE!! It's not a hard concept. All you do is sit around here and Olympus bash. You never have anything helpful to say. You have other cameras, go hang out in their forums.

Lightroom 3 and CS5 were programs that were created long before the release of the E5. It's Adobe's responsibility to create the ability to read the E5 if they want the users to use their program. Not the other way around. Olympus provides software for their camera, so it's not like they are leaving you in the dark. If the user wants to use another program to edit photos, it's in their best interest to use one that is compatible with their format. Yes, Adobe is a big name company. And yes, they will upgrade their software to be able to work with the new ORFs. The E5 has just hit the market, and I imagine not many people in perspective have rushed to get one. Keep an eye on Adobe's website, they should have something to download soon.

November 27, 2010

The word's origin is Japanese, which is why I will ask my Japanese friend the correct pronunciation of the root word. Her name is Hideko, and many pronunciations of her name is accepted. She often helps us the Japanese language so that we can more effectively communicate with some of our customers who are not proficient in English.

I'm not saying I'm correct or otherwise. I am seeking clarification from someone who would know best. I was just saying what I have learned. No need to get uppity.

Copied from Wikipedia:

In <a title="Photography" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photography">photography</a>, bokeh (pronounced <a title="Wikipedia:IPA for English" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IPA_for_English">/boʊˈkeɪ/</a>) is the blur,<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh#cite_note-davis-0">[1]</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh#cite_note-johnston-1">[2]</a> or the aesthetic quality of the blur,<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh#cite_note-Gerry_Kopelow_1998_118.E2.80.93119-2">[3]</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh#cite_note-3">[4]</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh#cite_note-4">[5]</a> in out-of-focus areas of an image, or "the way the lens renders out-of-focus points of light."<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh#cite_note-5">[6]</a> Differences in <a title="Optical aberration" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_aberration">lens aberrations</a> and <a title="Aperture" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperture">aperture</a> shape cause some <a title="Photographic lens" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photographic_lens">lens</a> designs to blur the image in a way that is pleasing to the eye, while others produce blurring that is unpleasant or distracting—"good" and "bad" bokeh, respectively.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh#cite_note-davis-0">[1]</a> Bokeh occurs for parts of the scene that lie outside the <a title="Depth of field" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth_of_field">depth of field</a>. Photographers sometimes deliberately use a <a title="Shallow focus" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shallow_focus">shallow focus</a> technique to create images with prominent out-of-focus regions.

Bokeh is often most visible around small background highlights, such as specular reflections and light sources, which is why it is often associated with such areas.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh#cite_note-davis-0">[1]</a> However, bokeh is not limited to highlights, as blur occurs in all out-of-focus regions of the image.

The term comes from the <a title="Japanese language" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_language">Japanese</a> word boke (暈け or ボケ), which means "blur" or "haze", or boke-aji (ボケ味), the "blur quality". The Japanese term boke is also used in the sense of a mental haze or senility.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh#cite_note-6">[7]</a>

The English spelling bokeh was popularized in 1997 in Photo Techniques magazine, when Mike Johnston, the editor at the time, commissioned three papers on the topic for the March/April 1997 issue; he altered the spelling to suggest the correct pronunciation to English speakers, saying "it is properly pronounced with bo as in bone and ke as in Kenneth, with equal stress on either syllable".<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh#cite_note-johnston-1">[2]</a> Bokeh replaced the previous spelling boke that had been in use at least since 1996, when Merklinger had also suggested "or Bokeh if you prefer."<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh#cite_note-7">[8]</a>

The term bokeh has appeared in photography books at least since 1998.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh#cite_note-Gerry_Kopelow_1998_118.E2.80.93119-2">[3]</a> It is sometimes pronounced <a title="Wikipedia:IPA for English" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IPA_for_English">/ˈboʊkə/</a> (boke-uh<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh#cite_note-8">[9]</a>).

November 25, 2010

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh">Bokeh</a> Let me go ask my Japanese friend and get back to you. I learned it as, and I've always used "bo-kay" as pronunciation. It's what I've always heard, it's what the net says... Never really thought to ask before. The only times I've heard "bo-ku" was by people who were unfamiliar with the word and it's origin.

November 25, 2010

Thaaaank you! :)

I use what I use because it's what I like. If or when I choose to upgrade is my choice. It does not mean I'm any less or more of a photographer just because "you" upgrade every chance you get.

October 23, 2010

<div>

00XXM8-293297684.jpg.4a818d3ae592a39f86a34c74a8d8a7ec.jpg

</div>

October 17, 2010

I would pay $15 for the chance to be published under National Geographic. And trust me, money is extremely tight for me at the moment! I myself have looked into entering into NG, just haven't done it yet as I do not feel I have an image yet worthy of entry. Look at who you're entering, their rules, etc. and decide if it's worth the fee. All in all, I don't think $15 is really that much to ask.

September 29, 2010

Yes... Everyone, please listen to the guy who is the self proclaimed creator of the "<a href="http://www.atlantamaxphoto.com/">MAXterpiece</a>".

September 29, 2010

Ken, do not challenge what you do not know. I am aware of what software I have, you however are in complete ignorance. Do not pretend to know, you only make yourself foolish.

Speaking for myself, and possibly many others: I was not born with a silver spoon in my mouth. I am not a spoiled child, as you make yourself seem. I work hard for what I have. I do not make those choices lightly. I do not upgrade every year for the lasted bit gimmick. What I do and why I do it is really none of your concern. Why do care? Why are you so offended? I don't give a rat's what you shoot with, why do you feel the need to attack me? I am sorry if you feel you have to try and degrade everyone around you to make yourself feel better. You have failed miserably in your attempt to flash your supposed dominance. Seems to me there might be issues here that go beyond your facade.

Enough if enough. Let it go. I waste no more time on you.

September 28, 2010

Ken, your expectations fall short because you are expecting a company that does play to the popularity contest game to play. They won't do it. They are not Canon or Nikon. They're not part of "The Big Three" (automotive reference). You are trying to compare apples to oranges. The closest thing they have in common is that they are both imaging devices, fruit if you will. However each company develops their technology in a completely different manner. I think you're missing the part about Olympus designs their cameras around their lenses and sensor. You If it was possible for them to have a 15MP sensor, they would have done so. New lenses have nothing to do with new cameras. Honestly, right now you're really just come across as a whiner with an unrealistic list of wants from an uneducated company stand point.

Gee whiz, Jeff, what happened? Did you fall out of the wrong side of the bed (and the bed is against the wall)?

</blockquote>

Uh, please see your own statement:

Again, please stay on topic... remember this is a forum discussion about the newly released and highly technological Olympus E-5 (sarcasm maximus).

</blockquote>

You're obviously upset because you think I'm against technological changes. There again, your comments demonstrate a severe lack of understanding when it comes to the needs and expectations of semi pros and/or professional photographers.

</blockquote>

Please don't lump me, or anyone else you don't know into your ramblings. You have an idea in your head. But what you consider to be professional and good, based on your personal website and PN portfolio, I find unappealing. Everyone has opinions. Opinions are just that, opinions. Not something that is right or wrong. Remember, the term professional is NOT synonymous with perfection. I myself am a paid professional photographer and I do so with a camera I bought 4 years ago as a consumer level DLSR. I have never been happier, and I cannot wait to get my hands on an E5.

but then again what else can one expect from someone who has so much delusional faith and loyalty in the way Olympus does things

</blockquote>

Again, please do not speak on which you know nothing of. I happen to know that Jeff is a devout Canon user. And he will not likely be converting to Olympus any time in near or distant future.

Bottom line in all of this, if you're not happy then move on. Go buy something else. To the rest of the world who does not not to buy a new camera every year because of technological evolution will mostly likely be more that pleased with what they chose to spend their money on. To each their own.

I'm sorry if your copy of Olympus Master did not perform as is was designed to do. I do not know what software was included with the E30 as I do not own one. I can tell you this though: My copy of Olympus Master that came with my E500, bought 4 years ago, does indeed process and convert RAW and everything else the camera produces. I can also confirm that the version my father has with his newly purchased E620 also converts RAW, etc. No additional software required.

On a closing dicussion note, I can all but guarantee that if Olympus is talking about advances in technology resulting in the extinction of "traditional" DLSRs, then everyone else is working on it as well.

September 23, 2010

Ken

Here's the whole quote from that <a href="http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Olympus_E5_The_last_Four_Thirds_DSLR_camera_news_301801.html">link</a>:

Olympus shies away from consigning Four Thirds DSLRs to history, but the firm has hinted that this may be the last Four Thirds model. 'We will continue to do these [Four Thirds cameras] until micro cameras can do what other products can,' said Olympus UK's Consumer Products marketing manager Mark Thackara. 'All cameras will be mirrorless in the future.' Olympus Europe spokeswoman Franziska Jorke cited the autofocus and burst rate of DSLRs as still being superior to Micro Four Thirds models, along with the optical viewfinders. When challenged by AP, Olympus shrugged off the possibility that equipping all future system cameras with an EVF will alienate existing E-system DSLR users. 'At some point someone has to draw a line in the sand… We will continue to support that [E-system] until other technology catches up,' said Thackara. Jorke predicted that the concept of a camera 'will change in 5-10 years'. However, in a bid to reassure photo enthusiasts, she said there will always be an Olympus camera body available – whether a DSLR or another type of camera altogether – to allow users to benefit from current Four Thirds lenses.

</blockquote>

They are designing a whole new camera...

Another quote from this <a href="http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Olympus_E5__editorial_comment_news_301804.html">link</a>:

It's pretty important we understand exactly what the message is from Olympus at this stage. The company is not saying directly that the Olympus E-5 is the last camera it will produce that uses an optical viewfinder, and it is being pretty clear that whatever happens in the future, current E-system Four Thirds users will always have a body available that makes the most of their fine Zuiko lenses. What Mr Terada is saying, though, is that Olympus plans to do away with optical viewfinders when it thinks EVF technology is good enough.

</blockquote>

The important thing to take away from this is that they are designing a new camera that still supports their current Zuiko lenses whether it be a DSLR or some new mirrorless type of camera.

September 22, 2010

It all depends on the kid. You know them best, use your best judgment. I bought my son for his 4th birthday a P&S camera. It didn't last very long. By that I mean he lost interest in the P&S and wanted my DSLR all the time. He still shoots with it once in a while. He is now 5 and knows a little about lenses, which one he wants to use. (I really only have 2 to choose from, but still...) I help him change them of course. My DLSR is a small camera, Olympus E500. Fits in his hands much better than larger camera. He has also shot with much heavier a Canon 5D with battery grip, much to my surprise when I came home from work and saw it in his hands... But that's a different story. :) Bottom line, feel her out. See if she wants to learn about lighting and how to control it. Ask her questions. If she's interested then sure DSLR might be good for her. If she is not interested, stick with the P&S for another year or so.

September 21, 2010

Olympus shies away from consigning Four Thirds DSLRs to history, but the firm has hinted that this may be the last Four Thirds model. 'We will continue to do these [Four Thirds cameras] until micro cameras can do what other products can,' said Olympus UK's Consumer Products marketing manager Mark Thackara. 'All cameras will be mirrorless in the future.'

</blockquote>

September 19, 2010

Fun!

September 19, 2010

hehe - My vote goes toward Unidentified Flying Object. Just probably not the aliens from outer space type. :)

It really could be just about anything. Something appeared in the frame emitting or reflecting light, then left.

September 19, 2010

Ken "Max" Ok, that comment was a joke :) , but yes! Yes it is! For me, absolutely! I'm not a wishy washy person. I stand my ground, and I don't back down. I find what I like and I stick with it. I am a loyalist, but I am that way because of the product they produce. (And I'm not just talking cameras here.) In this case I find Olympus to be far superior for my application. As far as crop factor, I don't do a lot of that anyway. A little here and there, but nothing huge. I keep the majority of the image I shoot, not much by way of wasted space. Because of the sensor I have double the focal length that you get in the Canon, etc. And you won't catch me dead shooting a wedding. Not for me. I hate weddings with a passion. Didn't even go to my own! lol

September 17, 2010

Jeff

I can't wait to see you kicking yourself, because I know it will happen. Just be happy to know that I'll be there with my E5 to take your picture! :)

September 17, 2010

I would like to point out that the E5 is releasing at the same price it's predecessor was sold for until the last about year and a half or so. Which is relatively low compared to it's competitors. I can't believe there is so much whining over the price, and not just in this thread but in others as well. With such a small sensor they've already maxed out pixel count. If they could fit more, I'm sure they would. I'm not going to complain though, 12.3 is more than enough. Olympus cameras are built around those sensors. They're not about to changing them anytime soon. It's part who they are and what they do, right along with their Zuiko lenses... I for one will be decided which kidney I can do without so that I can get my hands on the long awaited model as soon as possible. I'm more than stoked about the E5, and no one will bring me down from that. I'm a die-hard Olympus fan, and they've far from let me down on this camera. Looking forward to the day I get to have my new E5 join my E500 and OM1 family!

September 12, 2010

<div>

00XGzI-280033584.jpg.fe26863a957eeb7bbd762a199b913f44.jpg

</div>

September 10, 2010

<img src="http://i784.photobucket.com/albums/yy130/laceymyshell/LH102190.jpg" alt="" />ISO 1600 1/30sec at f5.6 42mm No Noise Filter

September 10, 2010

Costco has been mentioned many times here. I'm not knocking their product at all. Just would like to point out that not everyone has Costco memberships. Or access to a Costco. Myself I cannot even afford the cheap membership anymore. I used to have the Executive, now I have none. It's sad really, I really enjoyed all Costco had to offer.

It all depends on what you are using the prints for. Are you looking for a more professional site, or just an everyday sort of thing?

September 10, 2010

All the info for this was posted <a href="../help/gallery/critique/helpful-comment-voting">here</a>.

What specifically do I have to do to get the "helpful" icon? Is there a number of comments I have to reach?

You need to consistently leave comments that are helpful, that is as specific as we are going to be about it. When you get too specific about something like this, some people become too focused on the reward and not on the more important aspect, which is why you got the reward in the first place. It should be noted however that, like the film canister icons for site activity, the "helpful" icon is based on recent activity and is not permanent. If you take a six month break from photo.net (which we hope you don't do) you will have to start from the ground floor again.

</blockquote>

September 9, 2010

<div>

00XFrR-278875584.jpg.22b789c0b2e428014c5e16469facb54d.jpg

</div>

Sign In

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

Downloads

Gallery

Store

Posts posted by laceyhughes