bernie_.
-
Posts
27 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by bernie_.
-
-
<p>Hello</p>
<p>I only shoot b&w and I have a tabbed 80s Summicron (same optical formula than the new one without tab) and it's my standard 50mm. Also, I have a Leitz Summar from 1936 for those moments when I really want a true vintage look. But recently I'm starting to think if I'm losing something in my photography with this set and I wonder if I should sell both lenses and buy a collapsible Summicron or a Rigid one. In this way I'd get the best of two worlds - a stellar performer with an unique vintage look.</p>
<p>Thanks in advance for your responses.</p>
-
Thank you very much for your kind responses. I was taking lots of photographs these days and testing different filters. It's
amazing what can you get with filters.
Thanks again
-
Hello
I have a Red Filter from B+W (090, Wratten 25). It's the only filter I use with black and white film. I only use it for dramatic purposes in
certain occasions. Now I want to expand my filter usage and I just want to know which filters for black and white (HP5) are the best option.
I'm thinking in the B+W Yellow-Green (060, Wratten 11) and one of these alternatives:
- B+W Medium Yellow (022, Wratten 8) and B+W Yellow Orange (040, Wratten 16).
Cons: Maybe the Medium Yellow is similar to the Yellow Green with clouds and the sky. I also think that the Medium Yellow maybe is
useless with modern film and leses of today.
- B+W Dark Yellow (023, Wratten 15) and B+W Red Orange (041, Wratten 22)
Cons: Maybe the Red Orange is very similar to my Red Filter.
Any suggestions? Thanks in advance.
-
Thank you for your kind responses. Sergio, I appreciate your true knowledge about Rollei
world.
I'm gonna pass because I don't have any problem with the Mat and the Rollei has really
important flaws.
Thank you again.
Best regards
-
Hello
Thank you for all your responses. There is true knowledge in this forum. I put my hands
on the Rollei again and I notice new flaws. The wind lever is not smoth as my Mat. And the
speed and aperture knobs are hard to rotate. I'm wondering how a camera in this cosmetic
condition (lens and body are pristine) has this flaws... shutter speeds, wind lever, meter,
knobs...
Sergio, the camera doesn't come with the original incident light meter. The other
accesories are great for the price.
My dilemma is that I don't know if it is worth to replace a mint and reliable Mat 124G from
the early 70s for a Rollei Planar which needs a really serious CLA.
Decisions, decisions, decisions...
Anyway, thank you for all your comments and thoughts.
-
I find a Rolleiflex Planar 3.5 with selenium meter in very good cosmetic shape. The seller wants for the
camera 400 euros and it comes with case, strap, hood with case, UV filter with case, Rolleikin and macro
lens with case. Everything in very good shape.
The problem is that the selenium meter is not really accurate and the slow shutter speeds don't work
properly. Some speeds don't work and shutter stay always open. The camera needs a serious CLA and it
will cost me 100 euros aprox.
I have a Yashica Mat 124G. And my question is: Is it worth the Rolleiflex in this working condition for that
price? Will I really notice differences between the Mat?
Thank you very much in advance.
Bernie
-
Thanks for all your responses. I'm planning to keep the 124G. I suspect that the Yashinon of
the EM is a little bit different from the 124G's Yashinon. Ok, it's the same formula, but the
rendition of color is clearly different if you search in flickr. Even the black and withe pics have
another light rendition. I know that is difficult to make a statement from flickr photos, but it's
hard to believe that the Yashinon did'nt change through years and years of Mat development.
But the Em looks so cool...
Best regards.
-
Thanks for all your responses. I was plannning to sell the 124G and buy the EM, with a
extrenal meter. But I don't know if it's worth. Maybe I must save for a Rolleiflex. Decisions,
decisions, decisions... anyway, it's great to read good comments about the EM. I think
Yashica is probably the most underrated brands in history... nobody have negative thoughts
about their cameras.
Best regards
-
Hello!
I have a Yashica Mat 124G and I'm very happy with the results. But I don't like the "plasticy" feeling of the
camera and I've been thinking about "downgrade" to a Mat EM. I've found one really really minty. It looks
unused.
Is the lens of the EM exactly the same formula of the Mat124G
lens?
People say that the EM selenium meter is not accurate but... how
much? Is it usable anyway? Is really better the 124G meter?
Which camera do you think is better besides the cosmetic considerations (plastic vs metal) EM, 12, 124 or
124G?
Thank you very much
-
Very nice pics here! Thanks for your comments. I'm very happy shooting landscapes with the
35mm and I know any lens can be a landscape lens but I'm gonna test some lenses during
next days.
Lots words of wisdom here.
Thank you very much again.
-
Thanx for your nice comments. I appreciate your words. I've been using the D-Lux intensively this weekend just to see how I can do my best with this little devil. It's a really
great camera, but I wasn't made for digital.
Anyway... thank you again for your time and comments.
-
Hello!
I have several film cameras and one little digicam (D-Lux 3) I rarely use. It's a expensive camera and I feel
guilty. Sometimes I plan to sell it, but then I think about the convenience of having a digital camera in this
digital world.
The problem is that I don't feel nothing looking through a LCD screen and developing a RAW file. But, in
the other hand, I'm always excited with the idea of shooting with any of my film cameras, developing the
film in the bathroom and scanning it with the Epson.
... just thinking. Thank you for your comments.
Best regards.
-
I'm in the market for a exclusively landscape lens. I think 21mm, 24/25mm or 28mm are the best
choices, but I want to hear some opinions.
I only hace the classic 50mm and 35mm lenses for my Leica.
Thank you in advance!
Best regards
-
Harry, Richard, John, Laurent... thank you very much. I'm gonna check the websites. Maybe
the most easy solution are the UK's experts Peter Grisaffi and Malcom Taylor. This forum is
awesome. You never feel alone here. Thank you very much.
-
Thanks Harry. I don't speak german but I'm gonna contact him anyway. Thank you very
much.
-
Thanks Harry. Has Fotoechnick Reinhardt email or website?
-
Thank you guys, but I'm in Europe. Has Sherry a website or email?
Thanks for your responses. I love this forum.
-
Hello
This morning I heard something (a little loose piece) inside the M6's rangefinder. When I try to focus with
any of my lenses the double image doesn't move from infinity. Is it serious?
It's a Weltzar M6 and it's time for a CLA. I'm going to send it to Solms but I'm worry about the service and
the possibility of remove the original "Leitz" logo.
Thanks in advance for your comments and responses.
-
Thank you for all your good responses. I'm testing the lens. I'll show you the pics. And yes,
maybe this lens were produced in 1937. This is the my oldest possession...
-
<img src="http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/7356/l1000803cp8.jpg">
<img src="http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/3877/l1000799xw6.jpg">
<img src="http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/1163/l1000800uf8.jpg">
<img src="http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/7914/l1000801fq2.jpg">
<img src="http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/1033/l1000802wt5.jpg">
-
I'm very excited with this lens. I bought it beacause I love the glow of the pics I see of this lens.
Definitively the lens I have is uncoated but it has few little bubbles inside. The front element has cleaning
marks but the rear element is pristine. Cosmetically is in very good shape but the aperture ring not very
smooth but it's usable without problems.
I show you some pics. Opinions are welcome. I'm going to make some test shots next week.
Thank you very much guys.
-
Thank you very much. In this forum you can find real wisdom. I'm waiting for the lens and I
hope it was uncoated. I believe that an uncoated one has more 30s glow than a coated lens.
Anyway... I'll tell you about it next days. Thanks again. Very useful responses.
-
I've recently bought a 1937 Summar for the look of the pictures I've seen (very 30s glow) and I want to
know how I can tell if the lens is coated or uncoated?
Thank you!
-
Thanks again for all your responses. I'm trying to do my best again with the FM2... it's a little
wonderful camera. Very interesting thoughts about the Nikkor 24mm AI-s in the thread, by
the way.
50mm Question
in Leica and Rangefinders
Posted
<p>You guys are great. Thank you very much. Well, I'm gonna stick with the Summar and the v4 'Cron. I love these two lenses, that's a fact. And the 'Cron is really magical. I cannot imagine an ASPH version of this lens.<br>
Maybe my mind is playing tricks... :-)<br>
Thanks again.</p>