Jump to content

david_haynes

Members
  • Posts

    266
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by david_haynes

  1. To Andrew Davis... Perhaps I should've been more clear. There was no manipulation of lighting in PS, only auto levels, resizing and slight sharpening. The image is essentially as it came from the camera with what I consider "normal" tweaking for any image for online viewing. This is how it looked as I remember it.
  2. Recent addition to my "Alabama Folks" series. Experimental

    shot with 8x10 using a 72mm lens that covers slightly more than

    5x7 format, but on 8x10 covers a thin strip through the center of

    the film, hence the panorama format. The effect is a

    rectiliniar-corrected 140 degree angle of view, roughly equal to a

    12 mm on 35mm format.

    Harley Dawg

          1

    This is an 8x10 cropped from enlargement equal to 16x20, but

    the image seemed to hold together okay in the print from which

    this scan was made. Does the grain detract?

  3. A note to those commenting on image size: I earn my living directly from the sale of my photography. If I upload images of sufficient size to see every detail, anyone who wants the photo can drag it to their desktop and output on a digital printer. Aside from the potential loss of revenue from selling the print itself, the resulting digital print of a downloaded image could never approach the quality of the prints I make from large format negatives. I spend hours upon hours in the darkroom printing every image to the best of my abilities. This way, I know that everything that leaves my studio is of the highest quality I can produce. Relinquishing that control is what's at issue for me. For that reason I never upload anything over 40 or maybe 50 kb so no one will be tempted to make a print as described above. Besides, if it's a good image, 50kb should be able to convey that and whet the appetite to see the real thing.
  4. A note to those commenting on image size: I earn my living directly from the sale of my photography. If I upload images of sufficient size to see every detail, anyone who wants the photo can drag it to their desktop and output on a digital printer. Aside from the potential loss of revenue from selling the print itself, the resulting digital print of a downloaded image could never approach the quality of the prints I make from large format negatives. I spend hours upon hours in the darkroom printing every image to the best of my abilities because I know that everything that leaves my studio is of the highest quality I can produce. Relinquishing that control is wha't at issue for me. For that reason I never upload anything over 40 or maybe 50 kb so no one will be tempted to make a print as described above. Besides, if it's a good image, 50kb should be able to convey that and whet the appetite to see the real thing.

    Cumberland Mist

          1

    Luck was the reason this light appeared as an early morning breeze blew

    mist off the Atlantic into the maritime forest on Cumberland Island. Photo is

    part of a book project on Cumberland.

    Chris at Home

          6

    This shot started a love affair that I've yet to get over (with the

    Leica rangefinder camera). It was my first time to ever use a

    (borrowed) M6 and we shot in the dim available light of her

    apartment.

    Bubba's Red Wagon

          8

    This photograph was taken last year by my (then) 8-year-old daughter of

    her dog, Bubba. She also hand-tinted the wagon and won a photo contest

    at school with this print..

    Dog Tired Dog

          1

    I took this photo of our Golden Retriever, Bubba, (sheared for

    summer) on the return canoe trip from an outing on Hatchet

    Creek which included non-stop fetching and swimming for him.

×
×
  • Create New...