Jump to content

tony_fletcher

Members
  • Posts

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by tony_fletcher

  1. <p><strong>The 17-55 f/2.8 is awesome.</strong> I repeat: awesome. I shoot my kids all the time with it from infants to-now-the oldest at 7. Low light, bright light, ice rinks, indoor, outdoor, soccer, portraits, parties, beautiful bokeh, super-sharp...it's truly the "walk around" lens for the cropped sensor. Pony up—you'll love it.</p>
  2. <p>The lens is the Canon EF-S 17-55 2.8 IS. There is a "sharp cut" UV filter on it.<br>

    I always thought-and expected-lens flare to come from the side, across the lens. I'm surprised to see it here, almost in front of the lens?<br>

    The beer is good! There's a brewery here in town that lets you brew your own. I made 15 gallons of porter with some friends. The joke of the photo is that they bottled their share and I put mine in a 5 gallon soda keg. I was just rubbing it in!</p>

  3. <p>I read where some 7Ds had an issue with ghosting, with images taken in burst mode. A recent firmware update was sent to address this issue. Anyway, I was goofing around tonight and I took the following image (to make some friends jealous!) and I see the Guinness neon sign made quite a ghosted image. Is this typical? I've never seen anything like this. Is this lens flare, with a neon sign?<br>

    <img src="http://tonyfletcher.com/~pickup/Sites/filechute/mmmmmbeer.jpg" alt="" /></p>

  4. <p>I'm in the process of making this oval print a more traditional rectangle. I began by cloning the background, but I think a better avenue would be to find a similar background, edit the color and replace the background all together. Then silo the subject.</p>

    <p>Any ideas on where I could track down such a background? Or perhaps I some input on creating something similar in PS with the pattern maker?</p>

    <p>Or...any other ideas welcome? </p>

    <p>http://tonyfletcher.com/~pickup/Sites/filechute/tonyfdesign_032.jpg</p>

    <p>Thanks in advance.<img src="http://tonyfletcher.com/~pickup/Sites/filechute/tonyfdesign_032.jpg" alt="" /></p>

  5. <p>I spent the weekend exploring my new 7D. I thought our local ice rink would be a good high-ISO test since it has such poor lighting. Attached are two at ISO 1600. I'm pretty pleased with the level of noise.<br /> I used Canon's DPP to process these RAW files as it seems to be doing a much better job than Lightroom.<br>

     

    <p>http://tonyfletcher.com/~pickup/Sites/filechute/rink-2.jpg<br>

    http://tonyfletcher.com/~pickup/Sites/filechute/rink-1.jpg</p>

    </p>

  6. <p>Not sure when the "Q" button was introduced as I recently moved from a 30D to the 7D. Just wanted to say what great feature the "Q" is. I really appreciate the ability to get a quick glance-and the ability to make a quick change.<br>

    Hope to post some 7D test shots soon.</p>

  7. I sent a few test prints to Adorama and they came back a little dark. They look like prints I make here on HP B9180 printer when Photoshop and the printer both apply color correction.

     

    The prints I sent as a test, were:

    TIFF

    ColorSpace: AdobeRGB 1998

    Bit Depth: 8

    Resolution 300dpi

     

    On the Adorama site I checked the box "perform color correction." That's where I went wrong correct? If the images are arriving at Adorama with the AdobeRGB 1998 color space, and then Adorama applies their profile, I have in a sense "double" corrected these images which could account for the darkness?

     

    And, my monitor is properly calibrated via the Gretagmacbeth Eye1.

×
×
  • Create New...